Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dimole 的废话频道

@DimoleSaidWTF

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

460subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001670769323
TypeChannel
Username@DimoleSaidWTF
Description插画收藏夹: @Dimole_pixiv 私聊机器人: @dmlgzs_bot 友链: 笨蛋ovo的个人频道: @BDovo_Channel
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DimoleSaidWTF

Growth

4607 Aug 2026, 17:07 — 460 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 04:49 — 460 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:078 Aug 2026, 04:49
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 459–461 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 04:49460no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:07460first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
89.0%
avg views ÷ 460 subscribers
Avg views / post
410
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held17 (12 March 202622 July 2026)
Views total819
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
392
Videos
7
Links
24

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2256.4%
😁820.5%
👏512.8%
😇25.13%
🙏25.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC390 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

唉,一毕业就失业了😭 春招到现在投了一堆公司,很多甚至连个面试机会都没给(腾讯甚至是一点动静都没有和死人一样),有的面试后也没消息或者说没有岗位了

6

15 Jul 2026, 20:03 UTC429 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

哪来的野狗,莫名其妙发了一堆脏话,还设置7秒自动删除,是因为全家寿命都只有7秒吗?

4😇2

28 Apr 2026, 07:19 UTC957 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @vps_xhq

使用.icu域名的网站在中国大陆出现连接问题 来自VPS主要论坛和群组的消息称,今天下午开始,中国大陆所有对*.icu域名网站的访问均被重置。怀疑 GFW 正在对.icu顶级域名实施基于 SNI 的通配符连接重置以及泛域名 DNS 污染。 由于今日国家安全部发布了反对境外反华敌对势力渲染“努力无用”“奋斗吃亏”等消极观念的文章,因此有讨论认为本次封锁可能是中国“反躺平”行动的一部分。 [消息等级 Level C2 · 简要]

😁8

14 Apr 2026, 22:12 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 8 August 2026

看到个比某检测器还魔的检测器 查app安装来源 国产系统预装软件和o系换机都能被认定为提权痕迹 LingQingDetector

9 Apr 2026, 16:43 UTC≈1,040 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

原来是三种颜色壁纸随机用啊 我说你两个默认壁纸选这么接近的颜色干什么

9 Apr 2026, 16:34 UTC623 viewsread 8 August 2026

艹了 我把两个手机截图放一起对比颜色就是不一样的 这byd默认壁纸怎么还能不同颜色

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DimoleSaidWTF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dimole 的废话频道” (@DimoleSaidWTF), 460 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DimoleSaidWTF.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.