Channel
@Dikirakerenn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
300subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003846173406 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Dikirakerenn |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 9 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Dikirakerenn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 300 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:00 | 301 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 301 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 9 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
555 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 143 | 25.8% | |
| 💯 | 134 | 24.1% | |
| 🤮 | 103 | 18.6% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 12.1% | |
| 👏 | 31 | 5.59% | |
| 😭 | 23 | 4.14% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 3.06% | |
| 🥱 | 12 | 2.16% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 1.62% | |
| 😨 | 7 | 1.26% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 1.08% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.18% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 555reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 6 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Didiemin, kirain udah berubah dan people can change. Ternyata masih sama aja kelakuannya. dikasih waktu, dikasih kesempatan, bahkan udah lewat dari masalah sebelumnya, tapi yang keliatan malah pola yang sama terus. Muncul baru lagi, @YeathitBlunder
😭14
Sekarang gua paham kenapa gundik ngga mau minta maaf, karena masih ada temen temennya yang ngebela kaya gini. Padahal inti masalahnya bukan soal gundik ngatain penganut agama tertentu atau ngga nya, tapi karna dia ngejadiin tuhan sebagai bahan bercandaan. Dan iya, itu urusan dia sama tuhan, tapi dia ngomongnya di grup publik yang isinya 700+ orang. Jadi wajar kalo orang nyuruh minta permintaan maaf secara publik, bia…
👏30💯18🤮8👍7❤5
Keterlaluan
❤2
Bantu up kasus nya di X juga @dikirakerenn, mereka nantangin juga buat di up terus kasus nya biar ga flop, mereka jg mau di spill di semua pf. @sDEVlL 7683856492 @tKennedys
❤29💯11🔥9
I genuinely hate this phrase so bad
🤮48😢9😨7❤1
Ayo fokus ke persoalan mereka yang udah fatal, buat pelaku jangan dibiasain ya malah bertindak seolah korban. Padahal kalian dapat hate komen resiko, karena kalian juga suka ngetik tanpa dipikir dulu, lagian siapa yang suka sama mereka kalau bahasannya atau jokes mereka kaya gitu? Kalo di hate anon resiko kalian, apalagi kalian bikin ulah dengan fatal, masa iya berharap dapat pujian? Tabur tuai itu ada, kalian ngatai…
💯22❤10
Terus sebarin screenshotan cf emang ga dibenarkan kok, admin juga udah meminta maaf dan langsung di sensor. Tapi maaf ya, setelah admin minta maaf Desmath malah ngatain, marah marah dan ngancam masalah mau dibesar besarkan, jatuhnya kaya DISENGAJA masalah ini dibesarkan karena mau nutupin kasus mereka. Kalau admin dipersoalkan karena up ss cf mereka padahal konteks spill juga masih nyambung dan yang admin ss juga ti…
💯25❤9🔥8👏1🤮1😁1
https://t.me/Dikirakerenn/115?comment=17167 Bukan tanpa alasan admin ngespill karena ada korban yang speak up di comsec. Mimin heran mereka bisa gerak cepat buat marah marah karena cf mereka dibobol orang dan mereka cepet banget cari kesalahan admin bahkan yang mangkal disini buat jadi bahan buat nyerang balik biar kasus mereka yang fatal itu tenggelam. Padahal konteks yang disebar luaskan juga tidak oot dari persoal…
🔥20💯8❤3
Intinya, nggak ada kesalahan yang lebih fatal dari ini. dan sampai sekarang juga nggak ada itikad baik atau permintaan maaf dari gundiknya. Inget, Tuhan bukan buat dijadiin bahan jokes.
💯39❤14🥱12🥰5
Admin tutup dulu ya, supaya masalah gundik ke up terus dan nggak tenggelem.
❤25🤮11👍6
AnoMessBot.t.me?start=MPV0olC Ini anon admin ya, buat yang mau kasih info atau saran boleh langsung kesini.
❤22🤮13
Bantu up kasusnya yang di X ya guys, thank u so much.
🔥23❤9🤣2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Dikirakerenn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 131,867 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Dikirakerenn named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Weird behavior.” (@Dikirakerenn), 300 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dikirakerenn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.