Channel
@DigitaleStrategienundWiderstand
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
247subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001670576921 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DigitaleStrategienundWiderstand |
| Description | Hier möchte ich Nachrichten zum Thema Datenschutz posten, um die Totalüberwachung durch Sillicon-Valley zu mindern. Sämtliche Dienste der Kraken lehne ich ab und nutze Alternativen. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DigitaleStrategienundWiderstand |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 247 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:40 | 247 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,522 |
| Reactions total | 17 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
17 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 6 | 35.3% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 29.4% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 23.5% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 5.88% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 5.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Es geht um die Lückenlose Überwachung, die sie auf Teufel komm heraus, überall installieren wollen. Zudem krepieren die Bäume und Pflanzen. Schaut euch mal Bäume und große Sträucher an, die in direkter nähe von solchen Masten stehn. Ich hatte früher nie auf sowas geachtet, hatte aber letztens irgendwo einen Artikel und viele Bilder zu diesem Thema gelesen.
Signed Linux Fan
Von der Stadtplanung war der Mast abgelehnt worden, weil Grünflächen in erster Linie der Erholung dienen sollen und der Bau in eine übergeordnete Grünbeziehung eingreift. Auch der Bezirksausschuss Trudering hat Höhe und Ausmaß kritisiert. Stadt und BA werden bei Mobilfunkmasten gehört, haben aber kein Veto-Recht. „Das wurde alles über die Köpfe der Bürger entschieden, es gab keine Bürgerbeteiligung“, ärgert sich Ulri…
Signed Linux Fan
Ok...um den Seitenaufbau allein, geht es nicht. Der funktioniert zwar bei einigen Browsern, aber die Suche nicht. Und das Problem lässt sich per anderer Suchmaschine auch recherchieren. Denn Gugeln tue ich ja nicht.
Signed Linux Fan
Seit einiger Zeit, ist die französische Datenschutzsuchmaschine auf fast allen Browsern nicht mehr erreichbar. Scheinbar hat es mit Zertifikaten, die seitens Mozilla (Firefox) blockiert werden, zu tun. Probiert es selbst mal: qwant.com Ich teste grad alle meine Browser. Auf Linux natürlich. - Brave - FireDragon - Floorp - LibreWolf - Waterfox funktionieren nicht. - Palemoon - ungoogled chromium - Tor Browser funk…
🤔1
Signed Linux Fan
Der versteckte SIM-Karten-Hack, von dem du nichts wissen sollst. Deshalb ist es extrem praktisch, eine reine Daten-SIM zu verwenden.
👍1
Signed Linux Fan
Die Linux-Distribution Tails startet als Live-System und zielt insbesondere auf sichere und anonyme Kommunikation im Internet ab. Damit ist das Werkzeug nicht nur für von Überwachung bedrohte Anwender, sondern auch für Administratoren, die Wert auf Cybersecurity legen, interessant. In unserem Workshop zeigen wir Ihnen, wie Sie das System in Betrieb nehmen und erweitern.
Signed Linux Fan
Welche Distribution bietet Ihnen von Anfang an die Möglichkeit, Ihr System so einzurichten, wie Sie es tatsächlich möchten? Es gibt natürlich mehrere, aber eine der bekanntesten Linux-Distributionen ist Peppermint OS. Peppermint OS basiert entweder auf Debian oder Devuan und hat eine lange Geschichte der Beteiligung an der Linux-Community. Sie wurde diese Woche zur "Distribution der Woche" gewählt. Auch wenn wir vi…
Signed Linux Fan
⭕️ grafiksinc: This is a nice write up https://distrooftheweek.com/2026/08/05/distro-of-the-week-peppermint-os/
Signed Linux Fan
Sind Sie bereit für das „durchgedrehte KI“-Täuschungsmanöver? Kit Knightly Die KIs brechen aus – so lautet jedenfalls die Geschichte. Alles begann vor zwei Wochen, als OpenAI berichtete, einer ihrer „Agenten“ sei aus seiner Testumgebung entkommen und habe sich… https://uncutnews.ch/sind-sie-bereit-fuer-das-durchgedrehte-ki-taeuschungsmanoever/ 🔴 Nichts verpassen 📬⚡️Abo → @uncut_news 🔴 Spenden: https://uncutne…
Signed 𝕸𝖆𝖗𝖌𝖎𝖙 - 𝕻𝖗𝖎𝖓𝖟𝖊𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖓 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕾𝖈𝖍𝖜𝖊𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2😁1
Signed 𝕸𝖆𝖗𝖌𝖎𝖙 - 𝕻𝖗𝖎𝖓𝖟𝖊𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖓 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕾𝖈𝖍𝖜𝖊𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗
📡🧠 Wi-Fi kann zur Beeinflussung von Gehirnströmen genutzt werden – hat Potenzial für hypnotische Effekte und Social Engineering❗️ Wireless-Fidelity (Wi-Fi) ist schädlich aufgrund der Exposition gegenüber Hochfrequenzstrahlung, der pulsmodulierten HF-Übertragung von Daten, der extrem niederfrequenten (ELF) Wirkung auf das Gehirn und des Wi-Fi-Gedächtniseffekts in Körpergeweben. 👉 Eine der schädlichen Auswirkungen vo…
Signed 𝕸𝖆𝖗𝖌𝖎𝖙 - 𝕻𝖗𝖎𝖓𝖟𝖊𝖘𝖘𝖎𝖓 𝖉𝖊𝖗 𝕾𝖈𝖍𝖜𝖊𝖗𝖙𝖊𝖗
Im Alltag nutzt man das ohne Nachzudenken – man öffnet eine App, tippt ein Ziel ein, fährt los. Was dabei im Hintergrund passiert, bemerken die wenigsten: Karten-Apps wissen nicht nur, wo du gerade bist, sondern auch wo du regelmäßig startest, wo du abends ankommst und welche Orte du suchst. Plattformen wie Google erstellen daraus präzise Bewegungsprofile und speichern diese dauerhaft. Die Daten werden für verhaltens…
❤1👍1
Signed Linux Fan
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DigitaleStrategienundWiderstand. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,427,517 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Datenschutz und digitale Alternativen” (@DigitaleStrategienundWiderstand), 247 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DigitaleStrategienundWiderstand.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.