Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Digital-nonDigital 3ed (D-nD 3ed)

Channel

Digital-nonDigital 3ed (D-nD 3ed)

@Digital_nonDigital

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002215114878
TypeChannel
Username@Digital_nonDigital
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Digital_nonDigital

Growth

425146.56 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers13 August 2026 — 51 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–52 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 23:4751+9
10 Aug 2026, 17:1542no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:0542first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
840.1%
avg views ÷ 51 subscribers
Avg views / post
428
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.636%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (5 August 20259 August 2026)
Views total2,999
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1340.6%
👏515.6%
🔥515.6%
🎉412.5%
26.25%
😎26.25%
🤗13.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2025 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 15:11 UTC145 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Еще больше нововведений на фестиваль Digital-nonDigital! У нас будут персональные бейджи. Если хочешь выделиться среди толпы участников, то это твой шанс ❓ Как же его получить? В форме регистрации поставь галочку, что хочешь персональный бейдж, и добавь подпись, если есть желание ❗️Но поторопись! Такая возможность доступна до 12 августа! После этого все зарегистрированные персональные бейджи превратятся в тыкву обы

1

8 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC176 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🔎 Самое время раскрыть тайну секретной активности фестиваля, где мы обСУДим игры! Да, да, мы будем судить часть игр с шоукейса. Два эксперта возьмут на себя роли прокурора и адвоката, и через свой фидбек игре попытаются склонить чашу весов в сторону скорого релиза или отправки игры на доработку. Но последнее решение будет за присяжными - зрителями этого суда Формат дико экспериментальный, но если он понравится, то

3😎2

8 Aug 2026, 04:33 UTC183 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

‼️Последний день приема заявок‼️ 🗣 Ищем спикеров, готовых рассказать интересные лекции на фестивале разработчиков видео и настольных игр Digital-nonDigital 3ed или D-nD 3ed! Заполнить форму можно 👉 здесь ❓ Какие требования к лекции? 1️⃣ Быть полезной для разработчиков настольных и видео игр 2️⃣ Быть по продолжительности не больше 1 часа ❗️Заявки принимаются по 8 августа или когда будут заняты все слоты ❗️Прошедши

🎉1

2 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC318 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Ищем экспертов, готовых поучаствовать в секретных активностях на фестивале разработчиков видео и настольных игр Digital-nonDigital 3ed или D-nD 3ed! Заполнить форму можно 👉 ТУТ ❓ Какие требования к эксперту? Быть достаточно опытным в сфере разработки игр и быть готовым поучаствовать в секретных активностях, где может пригодиться твой опытный взгляд ❗️Заявки принимаются по 7 августа А если хочешь просто прийти н

1 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC347 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

💻 Ищем игры, которые хотят показать себя на фестивале разработчиков видео и настольных игр Digital-nonDigital или D-nD! Заполнить форму можно тут 👉: https://forms.gle/DSbwDJN1Be5wvSkM9 Могут участвовать как и видеоигры, так и настольные игры ❓ Как будет проводиться отбор игр? Отбор будет происходить в два этапа: - по 10 августа нужно будет заполнить заявку. - по 12 августа нужно будет отправить билд игры или фото

31 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC290 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🗣 Ищем спикеров, готовых рассказать интересные лекции на фестивале разработчиков видео и настольных игр Digital-nonDigital 3ed или D-nD 3ed! Заполнить форму можно тут 👉: https://forms.gle/pkYAT1q1Mn3RKcxK7 ❓ Какие требования к лекции? 1️⃣ Быть полезной для разработчиков настольных и видео игр 2️⃣ Быть по продолжительности не больше 1 часа ❗️Заявки принимаются по 7 августа или когда будут заняты все слоты ❗️Прошедш

27 Jul 2026, 05:34 UTC≈1,540 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Свершилось! Третья редакция D-nD готова и ждет участников! 📆 15 августа с 13:00 до 19:45 приходи на фестиваль разработчиков видео и настольных игр Digital-nonDigital или D-nD в пространство Балкон! Приглашаем всех! И разработчиков, и интересующихся геймдевом и кто хочет в него погрузиться. ❓ В чем цель фестиваля? Объединить разработчиков настольных и видео игр, а также всех интересующимся геймдевом в одном месте!

3🎉3

10 Aug 2025, 10:40 UTC501 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Фестиваль закончился, самое время дать фидбек! Оставь свой, чтобы сделать следующий Digital-nonDigital лучше 😊 Ссылка на форму тут 👉: https://forms.gle/2UMcURhqvPUxejmq9 Также будем рады посещению и других мероприятий Новосибирского Геймдева. О них можно узнать тут: VK: https://vk.com/gamedevnsk Telegram: https://t.me/GameDevNSK_Events

3

9 Aug 2025, 11:45 UTC130 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 Вот фестиваль Digital-nonDigital и подходит к концу! Подходите в лекторий на заключительное слово организаторов сразу после текущей лекции. И огромное спасибо всем, кто пришел на мероприятие!

👏5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Digital_nonDigital. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 111,123 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Digital-nonDigital 3ed (D-nD 3ed)” (@Digital_nonDigital), 51 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Digital_nonDigital.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.