Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑦| 𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝐽𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟📚.

Channel

𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑦| 𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝐽𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟📚.

@Diary_Hermione_Granger

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

37subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002473713643
TypeChannel
Username@Diary_Hermione_Granger
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Diary_Hermione_Granger

Growth

363736.511 Aug 2026, 01:47 — 36 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 02:00 — 36 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:52 — 37 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 01:4712 Aug 2026, 01:52
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36–37 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:5237+1
11 Aug 2026, 02:0036no change
11 Aug 2026, 01:4736first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.7%
avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
Avg views / post
20.6
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (3 August 20265 August 2026)
Views total412
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

36 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1336.1%
🥰925.0%
❤‍🔥616.7%
🔥616.7%
💋25.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC24 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Начать писать 2 главу?

  1. Да да да!!83%
  2. Мм наверное нет17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

5 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC16 viewsread 11 August 2026

А что будет дальше узнаем во 2 главе

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

5 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC17 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Фф Драмиона «За одну лишь ночь» Глава 1 Встреча после стольких лет Прошло много лет после той войны, где Волан-де-Морта победили. Именно Гарри Поттер, мальчик, который выжил, сумел победить его, убив простым заклинанием, что даже в горле вставал ком. Даже сильным магам не под силу было победить то зло, которое жило в нём. Прошло 10 лет. Гермиона попала в министерство магии, она всегда мечтала работать там. Та сама

🥰21🔥1

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

5 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC17 viewsread 11 August 2026

Готовы увидеть мою 1 главу?

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

5 Aug 2026, 04:15 UTC27 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

В этом данном фанфике будет несколько глав! Спойлер:В данных постах будет нецензурная лексика, постельные сцены, насилие и много чего. Лицам кому не исполнилось 18 лет пожалуйста не читайте! Так как это для вашего комфорта.

2

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

5 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC21 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Придумала название для фанфика «За одну лишь ночь».

  1. ВАЙ КРУТО!71%
  2. Ого ну ничего себе43%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

4 Aug 2026, 18:48 UTC32 viewsread 11 August 2026

Сегодня ночью ждите ролевые посты или же главы от меня

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

4 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

4 Aug 2026, 18:42 UTC19 viewsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

4 Aug 2026, 18:41 UTC19 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⏜ ꯭ 📖𝑁𝐸𝑊 𝑃𝑂𝑆𝑇🗞 𓈒༢ Мои мысли все о работе, но всё же вспоминать некоторые моменты стоит. Один раз я помню, что подходит ко мне Тео Нотт, он был на Слизерине, и он был ещё тем кудрявым парнишкой, который только и мечтает попадать в неприятности. Вот стою я в коридорах Хогвартса, и ко мне подходит Нотт и отбирает книгу со словами: «Грязнокровка опять читает эту книжонку? И что Белла Свон нашла в этом Эдварде? Пф, бред

🥰31❤‍🔥1💋1🔥1

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

4 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC14 viewsread 11 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

4 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC16 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

⏜ ꯭ 📖𝑁𝐸𝑊 𝑃𝑂𝑆𝑇🗞 𓈒༢ И всем вечера, звёздочки прекрасного вечера. Этот день мне не очень удался, мне прилетело письмо от Гарри... и кажется, он заболел. Я всегда понимала Гарри, и сейчас я написала Джинни, чтобы она полечила Гарри, всё же как ни как я почти их свела вместе... Но меня не покидает ощущение, что за мной кто-то следит, было до мурашек страшно и одновременно любопытно. Может, Волан-де-Морт ожил!? Или ещё ху

❤‍🔥21🔥1🥰1

Signed 𝙂𝙧𝙖𝙘𝙚📃🖊#Чернокровная

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Diary_Hermione_Granger. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Начать писать 2 главу?

  1. Да да да!!83%
  2. Мм наверное нет17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTCAnonymous Poll7 voters

Придумала название для фанфика «За одну лишь ночь».

  1. ВАЙ КРУТО!71%
  2. Ого ну ничего себе43%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTCAnonymous Poll6 voters

Ребята хотите ролевой пост о встрече Гермионы и Малфоя?

  1. Да будет интересно67%
  2. Ммм наверное нет...50%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 971,865 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑦| 𝐻𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝐽𝑒𝑎𝑛 𝐺𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟📚.” (@Diary_Hermione_Granger), 37 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Diary_Hermione_Granger.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.