Channel
@DianDian0609
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
146subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003626303209 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DianDian0609 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DianDian0609 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 146 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 143 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (28 July 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,327 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
13 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 7 | 53.8% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 30.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
我上楼看到了俩个人但是不知道是干什么的，然后就在问大哥几个人在哪里 大哥也没有回答 我以为是干嘛的，就没有给他房号，让大哥先下楼，因为真的被吓到了，所以想等会看看什么情况再给他房号，可能是我没说清楚，但是真没必要说我照骗，他约过我的，过后我也好好跟他解释并道歉了， 但是我看到有几个陌生人肯定要考虑一下安全问题，希望大哥别乱传说我什么照骗了，我没有放你鸽子遇到这种事肯定以安全为主，我能理解大哥大老远过来，也一直在跟你道歉，谁也不希望不好的事发生，以后来的哥哥们电梯口或者房间门口有人先不要着急进房，
新认证视频来了哦～在线中≧∇≦
👎1
✨ 命运揭晓时刻 ✨ 杰尼龟（@jngsz） 龙岗 点点 优惠券抽奖 @Dian0629 开奖了 抽奖人数：8，抽奖号数：8 1. 不知道 中得：100通用优惠券 2. （缺爱）老白 中得：100通用优惠券 3. 🈚️无相 中得：100通用优惠券 4. ggmgGGmg 中得：100通用优惠券 5. 赴山海 中得：100通用优惠券 6. 马克 中得：2p优惠200券 7. 何枫叶搭达 中得：2p优惠200券 8. 南风知我意 中得：2p优惠200券 抽奖说明： 1. 兑奖请联系 @Dian0629 2. 奖品自开奖时间起7天内有效。 3. 炸号者中奖作废。 4. 发奖人在发奖前请仔细阅读发奖指引，以防奖品被冒领造成不必要的损失👉 https://t.me/kind216/238 🔍 杜绝黑幕，点击查看本次开奖全程验证
🉑接视频语音验证 保证本人
❤3👎1
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎁 积分抽奖（定时开奖） 龙岗点点的活动 ├开奖时间: 2026-08-19 12:00 ├参与需加入: │⭐ 深圳茶楼 │└消耗积分: 200 │🎫 点点的新小窝🏠ovo │🎫 深圳榜 │🎫 茶楼#嫩妹 │🎫 深圳茶楼#千元P以下（含一千） │🎫 深圳茶楼#上门 │🎫 深圳茶楼#龙岗区 ├奖品列表: ├P优惠100 × 5 ├pp优惠200 × 3 ├抽奖说明：🔥请中奖者于开奖后7天内联系点点 https://t.me/SZCLNGQ/5709?single 查看原价并兑奖，中奖名额不可转让，过期不候。 🔥深圳茶楼不定期举行🧧活动，26年千元现金邀请活动已结束，新年红包活动已结束，四五双节千元活动已结束，端午父亲现金🧧活动已结束，后续活动择日进行～～ 进群 @vip40f 发送 抽奖 俩个字查询抽奖活动。 🔥茶楼积分获取途径是在群里每日发送：①签到。②邀请，复制邀请链接邀请他人进群。③发言（请不要超过十五…
🔥1
在哦🈳🉑预约
在哦🙈🙈 大号登不上去了，以后只用这个号 @Dian0629
👎1
晚上好呀 发个库存冒个泡🫧
👎1
今天依旧在线🀄️～
👎1
🈶🈳🉑预约🥰
开哦 过几天红休啦，想我的哥哥们尽快哦
❤1👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @DianDian0609. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,080,011 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“点点的新小窝🏠ovo” (@DianDian0609), 146 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DianDian0609.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.