3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 559–583 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 06:56
580
+18
8 Aug 2026, 03:34
562
no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:52
562
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
104.2%
avg views ÷ 580 subscribers
Avg views / post
604
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
9,666
Reactions total
248
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 03:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
310 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5906707903296840108
118
38.1%
🔥
76
24.5%
custom 5904573626673275460
25
8.06%
❤🔥
22
7.10%
👌
21
6.77%
⚡
15
4.84%
👍
10
3.23%
🤩
5
1.61%
🥰
5
1.61%
🏆
3
0.968%
💯
3
0.968%
👎
2
0.645%
👏
2
0.645%
👨💻
2
0.645%
🤓
1
0.323%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DevLosso. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🔡 اپلیکیشن کاربردی و جذاب برای آیفون 📱
اگر دنبال ارتقای امکانات گوشیت هستی این لیست از اپلیکیشن های جذاب iOS از دست ندید
🗣Kino
این برنامه یکی از بهترین اپلیکیشن های فیلم برداری برای گوشیهای آیفونه
🗣Clocks
این اپلیکیشن مجموعه ای جذاب از لاک اسکرین های زیبا و متنوع رو برای آیفونت فراهم میکنه
🗣Reminders
اپلیکیشن یادآوری کارها، لیست خرید و قرار ملاقات ها ساده، کاربردی، رایگان
🗣Crouton
یک اپلیکیشن کامل و جامع بر…
🚀 اگه به برنامهنویسی، هوش مصنوعی و دنیای تکنولوژی علاقه داری، کاپیتان کد برای توئه!
اینجا از ترفندهای کاربردی Git، لینوکس و VS Code تا معرفی ابزارهای خفن، مسیر یادگیری برنامهنویسی، فرصتهای فریلنسری و خبرهای مهم AI رو باهم دنبال میکنیم؛ کوتاه، کاربردی و بدون حرف اضافه. ⚡️
برای اینکه از دنیای کد عقب نمونی، همین الان عضو شو 👇
@captaincode_tech
مایکروسافت یه مدل جدید به اسم MAI-Cyber-1-Flash معرفی کرده که کارش پیدا کردن و بستن حفره های امنیتیه طبق گفته خودشون این مدل توی تست ها از GPT و Gemini بهتر عمل کرده و هزینهش هم تقريباً نصفه با سیستم جدید Perception بخش زیادی از این کارها خودکار انجام میشه؛ یعنی تهديدها پیدا میشن و قبل از دردسر برطرف میشن
📰 گوگل فقط یک روز بعد از عرضه، ابزار AI گوگل ارث رو جمع کرد
گوگل پنجشنبه یه قابلیت جدید تو گوگل ارث معرفی کرد که با 🍌 Nano Banana 2 (ابزار تولید تصویر گوگل) به کاربرا اجازه میداد روی نقشه های ماهواره ای واقعی، تصاویر ساختگی بسازن و جاش بذارن.
⚡️ چرا فقط یک روز دووم آورد؟
یه خبرنگار تحقیقاتی به اسم Henk van Ess با همکاری چند رسانه از جمله NPR نشون داد که میشه با این ابزار تصاویری از مهاجرین کنار مرز مکزیک یا حتی ی…
اگر لپتاپ گیمینگ داری، بهتره اپلیکیشن رسمی برندش رو نصب کنی💻 ✅
این برنامه ها برای مدیریت عملکرد، نورپردازی🎧 RGB، سرعت فن💨، پروفایل های بازی و آپدیت درایور ها استفاده میشن.
ASUS → Armoury Crate
MSI → MSI Center
(یا Dragon Center در مدلهای قدیمی)
Dell→ Alienware Command Center
Lenovo Legion → Lenovo Vantage
Acer Predator → PredatorSense
HP Omen → OMEN Gaming Hub
Gigabyte / AORUS → GCC
(Gigabyte Contro…
دیگه از os.path دست بکش؛ با pathlib کار کن🐍
خیلی از برنامه نویسا هنوز عادت دارن مسیر فایل ها رو با رشته (string) و os.path مدیریت کنن. از پایتون ۳.۴ به بعد ماژول pathlib این کارو خیلی تمیز تر و خوانا تر میکنه🦦😉
❗️قبل (روش قدیمی):
import os
path = os.path.join('data', 'files', 'report.txt')
if os.path.exists(path):
with open(path) as f:
content = f.read()
🟢بعد (روش pathlib):
from pathlib import Path
…
🎨 دیگه لازم نیست فتوشاپ رو خریداری یا کرک کنی
سایت: Photopea.com یه ادیتور تصویر آنلاینه که تقریباً کپی فتوشاپه؛ لایه، ماسک، افکت، Smart Object، همهچیزو داره. بدون نصب هیچ برنامهای، مستقیم تو مرورگرت باز میشه.
✅ چرا ارزششو داره:
فایلهای PSD (فتوشاپ) رو مستقیم باز و ذخیره میکنه
علاوه بر PSD، فرمتهای XD، Sketch، CDR رو هم پشتیبانی میکنه
روی هر سیستمی (حتی سیستمهای ضعیف یا کرومبوک) بدون لگ کار میکنه و رایگان…
🚫 اگر از تبلیغات اعصاب خردکن یوتیوب، آپارات، ساندکلاد و سایت ها خسته شدی، این افزونه رو نصب کن تا وب گردی خیلی تمیز تر و بدون تبلیغات داشته باشی.
🧩 اسم افزونه:
uBlock Origin Lite
⚡️ فقط کافیه از Chrome Web Store نصبش کنی و تمام! ✅
پلتفرم معروف Hugging Face که مرجع اصلی مدلها و دیتاستهای متنباز هوش مصنوعیه، هدف یک نفوذ امنیتی قرار گرفته و اطلاعات هزاران کاربر در معرض خطره.
هکر یک انسان نبود، بلکه یک ایجنت هوش مصنوعی خودکار بود، مربوط به یکی از مدلهای آزمایشی OpenAI. ماجرا اینجوری شروع شد:
یه دیتاست مخرب آپلود شده بود که از دو مسیر اجرای کد (RCE) توی pipeline پردازش دیتاست هاگینگفیس سوءاستفاده کرد
با این کار، ایجنت تونست دسترسی سطح node ب…
⚠️ اخیراً گزارشها نشون میدن که با رشد ابزار هایی مثل OpenAI و Google، پیاده سازی سایت های فیشینگ خیلی راحت تر شده!
📌 داستان چیه؟
هکر ها الان میتونن با کمک AI:
🤖 سایت های فیک کاملا مشابه سایت های واقعی بسازن
📩 ایمیل های کاملاً طبیعی طراحی کنن
🎯 کاربران رو دقیق هدفگذاری کنن
⚡ خطر کجاست؟
❗ ممکنه وارد یه سایت بشی که کاملاً شبیه سایت اصلیه
❗ اطلاعاتت رو وارد کنی و مستقیم بره دست هکر 😬
🛠 ابزار ساده تشخیص فیشینگ ب…
اسکنر امنیتی پیشرفته سایت 💻
اگه میخوای امنیت یه سایت رو سریع بررسی کنی، این اسکریپت بهت کمک میکنه هدرهای مهم امنیتی رو آنالیز کنی
کافیه لینک بدی، خودش درخواست میفرسته، ریدایرکتها رو دنبال میکنه و نشون میده چه چیزایی فعاله یا نه 🪐
import requests
#DevLosso
SECURITY_HEADERS = [
"Content-Security-Policy",
"Strict-Transport-Security",
"X-Content-Type-Options",
"X-Frame-Options",
"Referrer-Polic…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DevLosso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 691,781 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴅᴇᴠʟᴏꜱꜱᴏ” (@DevLosso), 580 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DevLosso.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
