Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DestroyzzOldShredder (R.I.P)

@DestroyzzOldShredder

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

70subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002016618718
TypeChannel
Username@DestroyzzOldShredder
Created22 April 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DestroyzzOldShredder

Growth

707 August 2026 — 70 subscribers9 August 2026 — 70 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–71 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 23:4670no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:0670first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 22 April 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Videos
6
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

293 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
293100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 22 April 2024 to 3 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jun 2025, 08:02 UTC548 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Pack Family Destroyzz by @deboyzz (PouYan) Destroyzz Old Shredder

9

31 May 2025, 12:52 UTC384 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @TroupkillazzClanVideo

Motherfuckers, we're here. We have come to violate your honor. Voultroyzz Destroyzz Retrousse https://t.me/TroupkillazzClan

6

26 May 2025, 09:20 UTC586 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

We are Come Back Fuck Your Mothers Enemy Destroyzz Is Back Bitch My Dick Enter Lips Mothers Enemy Evil Is Back

16

19 Jul 2024, 07:04 UTC≈1,920 views38 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

ㅤ🤩 ᴅᴇsᴛʀᴏʏᴢᴢ ᴏʟᴅ sʜʀᴇᴅᴅᴇʀ‌🤩 ‌ ‌ ‌ 🤍 ғʀᴀɢᴍᴏᴠɪᴇ 🤍 🪶 ᴏᴅʏsᴇᴜs_ᴅᴇsᴛʀᴏʏᴢᴢ 🪶 https://t.me/DestroyzzOldShredder

38

18 Jul 2024, 05:27 UTC≈2,700 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

Family Pack 🎮 https://t.me/DestroyzzOldShredder

27

24 Apr 2024, 20:11 UTC≈6,610 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Destroyzz Old Shredder دو عدد جورنی و ۱۵کک پول نقد برا بهترین پلیر داده میشود 𝐈𝐧𝐯𝐢𝐭𝐞 𝐅𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐎𝐩𝐞𝐧 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞: 𝐬𝐞𝐧+15: 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐠𝐚𝐦𝐞: 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥: 𝐟𝐚𝐦𝐢𝐥𝐲 𝐡𝐚𝐢 𝐤 𝐡𝐨𝐳𝐨𝐫 𝐝𝐚𝐬𝐡𝐭𝐢𝐝: 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐭 𝐦𝐦: 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐞𝐩𝐡𝐨𝐧𝐞: 𝐫𝐞𝐜 𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝟏𝐦𝐢𝐧 𝐜𝐚𝐩𝐭 / 𝐝𝐦𝐳: 𝐧𝐞𝐰 𝐧𝐚𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐚𝐠 (Destroyzz): 𝐬𝐞𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐨 𝐮𝐬: Canelo - ArTin

39

24 Apr 2024, 16:32 UTC≈3,370 views41 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👼Destroyzz Old Shredder👼 Brothe'rs .

41

23 Apr 2024, 12:05 UTC≈3,480 views50 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

#LeaderShips ‌ ☆ Dante_Destroyzz S22 - E53 Leave ‌ ☆ Amwq_Destroyzz S52 - E47 Leave ☆ Felix_Destroyzz S22 - E24 Leave ‌ ☆ Dante_Destroyzz S24 - E106 FG ☆ Felix_Destroyzz S35 - E56 × | T.me/Destroyzzoldshredder

50

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @DestroyzzOldShredder. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DestroyzzOldShredder (R.I.P)” (@DestroyzzOldShredder), 70 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DestroyzzOldShredder.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.