Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Designs squad | Дизайн вакансии

Channel

Designs squad | Дизайн вакансии

@Designs_squad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,838subscribers

+133 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001835848655
TypeChannel
Username@Designs_squad
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Designs_squad

Growth

10,64810,83810,7437 August 2026 — 10,705 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,705 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,697 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,691 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,690 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,684 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,678 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,674 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,670 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,666 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,661 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,648 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,838 subscribers7 August 202620 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 13 days, net +133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,620–10,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 13:3610,838+190
19 Aug 2026, 15:3410,648-13
18 Aug 2026, 15:2610,661-5
17 Aug 2026, 16:2610,666-4
16 Aug 2026, 14:0810,670-4
14 Aug 2026, 22:0810,674-4
13 Aug 2026, 15:0810,678-6
12 Aug 2026, 13:2410,684-6
10 Aug 2026, 09:4710,690-1
9 Aug 2026, 12:3910,691-6
8 Aug 2026, 13:1610,697-8
7 Aug 2026, 14:3110,705no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:2910,705first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.47%
avg views ÷ 10,838 subscribers
Avg views / post
376
40 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
40
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 40 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held40 (29 July 202620 August 2026)
Views total15,052
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 13:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

20 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎1155.0%
525.0%
👍420.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC175 views1 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ищу дизайнера, сделать листовки С прайсом и примерами в личку🔥🔥🔥 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Как выявить мошенника 👉 Читать Больше вакансий тут 👉 @GetClient_TG_bot

1

19 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC233 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Мы собрали подборку каналов для фрилансеров 😉 Удобно, когда все, что может быть полезно, находится в одной папке! Добавить папку можно по ссылке, не упусти возможность, ссылка доступна только 24 часа 👇 https://t.me/addlist/U0ngxc7Ka7RlNmI0

19 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC67 viewsread 19 August 2026
Photo

#ищу Ищу дизайнера, за подробностями писать в лс ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Как выявить мошенника 👉 Читать Больше вакансий тут 👉 @GetClient_TG_bot

19 Aug 2026, 04:25 UTC283 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте! В поисках дизайнера и маркетолога/ смм / сайты /яндекс директ ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Как выявить мошенника 👉 Читать Больше вакансий тут 👉 @GetClient_TG_bot

18 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC276 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Как спецу на маркетплейсах стабильно находить клиентов в 2026 году Без — откликов на вакансии — рассылок резюме — портфолио и кейсов Сейчас я просто повторяю 4 действия, которые стабильно приводят мне клиентов подойдет — Менеджерам маркетплейсов — Дизайнерам инфографики Узнать про этот способ — здесь👇 Я менеджер маркетплейсов Я дизайнер карточек

18 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC247 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

EVOXA ищет графического дизайнера Precision over excess - этот принцип у нас не на баннере, а в каждом решении: от формулы пилинга до того, как выглядит коробка, в которой она приходит. Мы делаем профессиональную дерматокосметику родом из Барселоны и с самого начала строим бренд так, чтобы за него не было стыдно поставить рядом с любым европейским именем в индустрии. Сейчас в этой системе не хватает одного человека

👎21

18 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC249 viewsread 20 August 2026

Схема: как зарабатывать 100-300$ в день на нейросетях Ахахах, повелись? Картинки, дешёвые тексты, карточки для Wildberries — этим сейчас занимаются все подряд. И зарабатывают копейки. Этот способ умер. Но есть другой. На нём зарабатывают те самые люди, которые продают вам курсы по нейросетям. Я знаю о чем говорю, потому что сам продавал их на протяжении долгих лет, а сейчас нашел новый формат, который в связке с

18 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC263 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет 🤝 Ищем дизайнера, кто может помочь с дизайном по сайту. Напиши в лс с кейсами ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Как выявить мошенника 👉 Читать Больше вакансий тут 👉 @GetClient_TG_bot

17 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC299 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Нужно сделать сайт для курсов Ищу дизайнера ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Как выявить мошенника 👉 Читать Больше вакансий тут 👉 @GetClient_TG_bot

16 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC228 viewsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @MPmanagersPhoto

Вы работаете с WB или Ozon и не знаете где искать заказы? Бот @LeadMagnet_MP_bot найдет их для вас 💪 Заказы на инфографику, seo карточек, вакансии для менеджеров и многое другое. Активируйте бесплатную подписку в боте и начните получать заявки от заказчиков уже сегодня 🔥

16 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC397 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Ищу дизайнера, нужно сделать несколько слайдов, пишите в личку. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Как выявить мошенника 👉 Читать Больше вакансий тут 👉 @GetClient_TG_bot

👎3

15 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC156 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ищем дизайнЕра для создания инфографики на WB, пишите в личные ⭐. ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Как выявить мошенника 👉 Читать Больше вакансий тут 👉 @GetClient_TG_bot

👎3

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @Designs_squad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

WORK ON
@workk_on · 80,538
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Удалёнка | Фриланс
@jobs_start · 134,404
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
Удаленка - вся творческая работа
@rueventjob · 87,041
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Designs squad | Дизайн вакансии” (@Designs_squad), 10,838 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Designs_squad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.