Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for За отзыв | Специалисты по маркетплейсам

Channel

За отзыв | Специалисты по маркетплейсам

@MPcase

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,499subscribers

+235 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001852731571
TypeChannel
Username@MPcase
Description🔥 Публикуем вакансии и резюме от начинающих специалистов по работе с маркетплейсами. • Купить рекламу: https://t.me/+iVfQ8Iyk8Kg0ZTE6 • Бот с вакансиями - @LeadMagnet_MP_bot • Разместить резюме - @MPdesigns_bot • Админ - @Art_666999
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held62
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/MPcase

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@MPcase/3899 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 14:07 UTC@MPdesigns/158334 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC1.009 days
@MPdesigns/158304 Aug 2026, 13:36 UTC@MPcase/3905 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 13:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@MPcase/3909 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC@MPdesigns/1588514 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC1.0034 hours
@MPcase/3916 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC@MPdesigns/1593525 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC1.0026 hours
@MPcase/3934 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC@MPdesigns/160778 Oct 2026, 05:45 UTC1.0023 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@MPdesigns5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0024 hoursthis entry (4–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 44 comparable posts for this entry, running 8 June 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,16311,56511,36411,4997 August 202611 November 2026
62 measurements spanning 96 days, net +235. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,103–11,625 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 01:2811,499-5
9 Nov 2026, 13:4111,504-4
8 Nov 2026, 09:0111,508-14
7 Nov 2026, 05:4111,522-17
6 Nov 2026, 07:4911,539-9
5 Nov 2026, 10:0611,548-10
4 Nov 2026, 11:2111,558-5
3 Nov 2026, 09:1811,563-2
2 Nov 2026, 10:1511,565+5
1 Nov 2026, 11:2611,560+4
31 Oct 2026, 14:0911,556+26
30 Oct 2026, 11:4811,530+37
29 Oct 2026, 10:0011,493-22
28 Oct 2026, 10:0611,515-17
27 Oct 2026, 07:2711,532-13
26 Oct 2026, 08:4711,545-7
25 Oct 2026, 11:2711,552-2
24 Oct 2026, 11:1011,554-1
23 Oct 2026, 10:2711,555+10
22 Oct 2026, 13:1411,545first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.30%
avg views ÷ 11,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
265
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.328%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held44 (8 June 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total2,384
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 09:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,330
Videos
≈2
Links
≈438

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤969.2%
👍323.1%
❤‍🔥17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC101 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Выспался. Создал чат-бота. Заработал +17.000 рублей. Пока ты едешь на «любимую работу» к 8ч утра, другие запускают этого бота, следуют пошаговой инструкции и получают +17.000 рублей за несколько часов работы. Эти люди не программисты и у них даже нет высшего образования. Они просто научились создавать чат-ботов, где нет ничего сложного. И за это им готовы платить 200-250.000 рублей в месяц. На старте новички зараб…

👍1

8 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC142 viewsread 11 November 2026

Веду 3 проекта из дома по 40к — на карте +120.000 в месяц, пока ты сидишь на окладе 60к Кто-то едет на «любимую работу» к 8 утра, а кто-то запускает этого бота, следуют пошаговой инструкции и получают +3.000 - 4.000 рублей за пару часов работы. Эти люди не программисты и у них даже нет высшего образования. Они всего лишь освоили профессию технического специалиста, где нет ничего сложного. И за это им готовы платить…

7 Nov 2026, 15:53 UTC173 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Помогаю селлерам Wildberries и Ozon улучшать карточки и считать прибыль — внимательно, системно и с соблюдением сроков. Меня зовут Елена, я менеджер маркетплейсов. Работаю с SEO-текстами, характеристиками и габаритами карточек, подготовкой ТЗ на инфографику и расчётом юнит-экономики. Учитываю закупочную стоимость, логистику, хранение и комиссии, чтобы помочь определить обоснованную цену. Для знакомства бесплатно пр…

6 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTC94 viewsread 8 November 2026

Веду 3 проекта из дома по 40к — на карте +120.000 в месяц, пока ты сидишь на окладе 60к Кто-то едет на «любимую работу» к 8 утра, а кто-то запускает этого бота, следуют пошаговой инструкции и получают +3.000 - 4.000 рублей за пару часов работы. Эти люди не программисты и у них даже нет высшего образования. Они всего лишь освоили профессию технического специалиста, где нет ничего сложного. И за это им готовы платить…

2 Nov 2026, 06:07 UTC121 viewsread 3 November 2026

Проснулся. Зашел в нейронку. Заработал +13 000 рублей Пока кто-то едет на «любимую работу» к 8 утра, другие запускают этот бот, следуют пошаговой инструкции и получают +13 000 рублей за несколько часов работы. Эти люди не программисты, и у них даже нет высшего образования. Они просто освоили нейронку, где она делает 90% всей работы. И за это им готовы платить 130–150 тысяч рублей в месяц. Звучит нереально, но имен…

31 Oct 2026, 07:20 UTCviews —

За отзыв | Специалисты по маркетплейсам pinned «Менеджер маркетплейса Wildberries Привет! Меня зовут Олеся Мёдова, и я — ваш надёжный помощник на пути к успешным продажам на Wildberries. Я не просто знаю теорию, а уже применяю её в работе. Все модули обучения я закрепила практикой через домашние задания…»

31 Oct 2026, 07:20 UTC374 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Менеджер маркетплейса Wildberries Привет! Меня зовут Олеся Мёдова, и я — ваш надёжный помощник на пути к успешным продажам на Wildberries. Я не просто знаю теорию, а уже применяю её в работе. Все модули обучения я закрепила практикой через домашние задания и тесты, поэтому мои знания превратились в реальные навыки. 🛠️ Ключевые компетенции: Контент-менеджмент: Создание продающих описаний товаров; оформление карточек с…

❤1

28 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC266 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🔴В 2025 году Россияне заработали 5,3 млрд рублей на арбитраже криптовалют По данным Минфин 32% граждан покинули своё место работы поскольку в среднем уже в первый месяц смогли заработать 250 000 рублей, а через 2-3 месяца с легкостью вышли на семизначные числа. Самое смешное, что лишь 8% россиян что-то слышали об этой профессии хотя все инструкции бесплатно лежат на канале Арбитраж Криптовалют Там объясняют, как и…

👍1

16 Oct 2026, 17:46 UTCviews —

За отзыв | Специалисты по маркетплейсам pinned «Менеджер маркетплейса (формирование подсортов). Наша компания более 3 лет успешно работает на маркетплейсах ( WB, OZON, Яндекс Маркет, Золотое яблоко). В настоящий момент ищем в команду менеджера маркетплейса для формирования и оптимизации подсортов — если…»

16 Oct 2026, 17:46 UTC634 viewsread 11 November 2026

Менеджер маркетплейса (формирование подсортов). Наша компания более 3 лет успешно работает на маркетплейсах ( WB, OZON, Яндекс Маркет, Золотое яблоко). В настоящий момент ищем в команду менеджера маркетплейса для формирования и оптимизации подсортов — если умеете эффективно управлять ассортиментом и хотите расти в этом направлении, будем рады знакомству. Обязанности: -Формирование и оптимизация подсортов -Анализ а…

14 Oct 2026, 09:11 UTC479 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🎯 Инфографика для карточек Wildberries и Ozon Константин. Делаю главные фото и слайды, которые отвечают на вопросы покупателя до того, как он их задаст. Ниши: украшения, косметика, электроника, промышленное оборудование. Что делаю: ✔ Разбираю вашу карточку и карточки конкурентов в выдаче ✔ Собираю слайды под возражения покупателя ✔ Нет нормальных фото товара - сделаю изображение нейросетью и доработаю руками 💰 Сл…

❤1

7 Oct 2026, 06:34 UTC517 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Так... Дай мне секунду... Выделяю твой товар среди покупателей... 👁 Мой псевдоним – Heaccch. Моя ниша – Инфографика и Создание принтов для различной продукции. У меня есть свой стиль и продукция с моими принтами и инфографикой набирает неплохие обороты. Если тебе надоели однотипные карточки, хочется попробовать чего-то нового или нужна просто качественная инфографика – нам с тобой по пути 🫵 Дай мне шанс, и я сдел…

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @MPcase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @MPcase as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
15 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
4 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

РАБОТА ИЗ ДОМА | ВАКАНСИИ
@rabota_is_doma_vakansii · 20,593
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“За отзыв | Специалисты по маркетплейсам” (@MPcase), 11,499 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MPcase.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.