Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

تَصَامِيم واقتِبَاسَات♥️

@Designedomar23

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

12,431subscribers

-43 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001246191465
TypeChannel
Username@Designedomar23
Descriptionقراءة الكتب والتصميم يحركانكَ .. ينقلانكَ من مكان لمكان ‏.. من عالمٍ لآخر .. وأنتَ في مكانك 🖇📖 • قنواتنا 📩 نبـــض : @oomarr5 حديث : @OT3543 تصاميمي : @Designedomar23
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Designedomar23

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

11.4 average views per post against 12,431 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.091%. Across the 4,324 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.5%, with a median of 7.20%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured62 of 62 published in the window (62 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled704
Mature posts only0.227% over 19 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers12,431 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:ara · 4,324 channels · p10 1.01% · p25 2.98% · p50 7.20% · p75 14.5% · p90 25.3%
Position in cohort0.393th percentile · 1/77 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageArabic · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,43112,47412,452.56 August 2026 — 12,474 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,474 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,467 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,461 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,454 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,448 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,439 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,431 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -43. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,425–12,480 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:3412,431-8
11 Aug 2026, 08:3212,439-9
10 Aug 2026, 11:1212,448-6
9 Aug 2026, 13:1112,454-7
8 Aug 2026, 13:5212,461-6
7 Aug 2026, 16:0112,467-7
6 Aug 2026, 22:3012,474no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:2112,474first reading

Engagement

76 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.091%
avg views ÷ 12,431 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.4
62 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.943%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 76 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 62 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held76 (26 May 202612 August 2026)
Views total704
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
312
Videos
84
Links
55

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
1s

Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1052.6%
👍736.8%
👏210.5%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 76 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 76 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

🌸•إبعت قناتك هنا وأصعدها لك 500 عضو مجاناً دون مقابل• @T_Daam_alnoor_bot

12 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

❤️أخييييييييييرًا لقيت القناة المميزة بعالم التليجرام اللي أبحث عنها من زمان، محتوى غير عن كل القنوات . https://t.me/+CEhntLAEo70zMzQ0 https://t.me/+CEhntLAEo70zMzQ0 أنصح الكل يتابعها لا تفوتكم 🔥⚠️

12 Aug 2026, 03:24 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026

❤️أخييييييييييرًا لقيت القناة المميزة بعالم التليجرام اللي أبحث عنها من زمان، محتوى غير عن كل القنوات . https://t.me/+CEhntLAEo70zMzQ0 https://t.me/+CEhntLAEo70zMzQ0 أنصح الكل يتابعها لا تفوتكم 🔥⚠️

12 Aug 2026, 02:24 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

❤️أخييييييييييرًا لقيت القناة المميزة بعالم التليجرام اللي أبحث عنها من زمان، محتوى غير عن كل القنوات . https://t.me/+CEhntLAEo70zMzQ0 https://t.me/+CEhntLAEo70zMzQ0 أنصح الكل يتابعها لا تفوتكم 🔥⚠️

12 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026

تمادى في سعادتك نحو الأشياء البسيطة والصغيرة، الغير مُكلفة التي يُحبها قلبك كثيراً وينظر لها الآخرين بأنها عادية جداً ولا تعني شيء، تمادى ولا تخَف♥️

12 Aug 2026, 01:04 UTC1 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🖤🎙 •هل تبحث عن أناشيد بدون موسيقى ⁉️

11 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

أول عشـــ10ـــرة ينضموا لهم هدية 🎁🎉

11 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

أول عشـــ10ـــرة ينضموا لهم هدية 🎁🎉

11 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

أول عشـــ10ـــرة ينضموا لهم هدية 🎁🎉

11 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC9 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

أول عشـــ10ـــرة ينضموا لهم هدية 🎁🎉

11 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

أول عشـــ10ـــرة ينضموا لهم هدية 🎁🎉

11 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC10 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

أول عشـــ10ـــرة ينضموا لهم هدية 🎁🎉

Showing the 12 most recent of 76 posts we hold for @Designedomar23. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“تَصَامِيم واقتِبَاسَات♥️” (@Designedomar23), 12,431 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Designedomar23.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.