Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Desert Dixie Active Club

@DesertDixieAC

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

463subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001940288231
TypeChannel
Username@DesertDixieAC
CreatedBetween 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DesertDixieAC

Growth

462463462.57 Aug 2026, 05:01 — 462 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 18:18 — 463 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:017 Aug 2026, 18:18
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 462–463 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 18:18463+1
7 Aug 2026, 05:01462first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 23 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3339.8%
👏2024.1%
❤‍🔥89.64%
78.43%
🔥78.43%
🏆56.02%
👍22.41%
🎄11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2025 to 3 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Mar 2026, 17:21 UTC442 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://gosaveutah.org/ Great resource. If you are in Utah, we highly encourage you to go through the list and message every senator opposing HB386 and HB136. Takes ten minutes to email or text them all. We need to make this state as unlivable as possible to illegal aliens

11🔥3👍2

3 Dec 2025, 22:59 UTC614 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @NevadaUnitedActiveClubPhoto

BROTHER CLUBS Active Club leadership from across the state met in solidarity to train and discuss the future of ACs in Nevada. We're proud to announce that Las Vegas Active Club has merged with Battle Born Active Club under the banner of Nevada United Active Club, serving the Las Vegas and Elko sectors. Northern Nevada Active Club and Battle Born Active Club Northern Nevada have merged under the banner of Northern N

❤‍🔥8🔥433

26 Oct 2025, 07:34 UTC567 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @culturewarcriminalPhoto

🇺🇸❗️🏴🏒 — ANTIFA ATTACK TPUSA ACTIVIST IN COLORADO Nathaniel Ellis, Secretary of TPUSA at CU Boulder, was followed home and assaulted by an Antifa terrorist armed with a hockey stick. The attack came two days after the local Antifa cell posted his dox online. We wish this Patriot a swift recovery, and remind our comrades to remain vigilant.

12👏2

20 Oct 2025, 22:23 UTC427 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WasatchActiveClubPhoto

Members of the Wasatch Active Club completed an 8 mile Ruck & Campout in the Monte Cristo Mountain Range 📍 Members also engaged in multiple comradely activities such as sparring 🥊 Join Today 😔 🇮🇹 WasatchActiveClub@proton.me

42

23 Sept 2025, 03:12 UTC≈3,210 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Members of the Desert Dixie Active Club met up with members of the Wasatch Active Club to put up fliers memorializing the recent victims of leftist anti-white violence: Charlie Kirk, Iryna Zarutska and Austin Metcalf. Many on the right bemoaned Charlie Kirk’s conservative centrism but in the final years of his life he was rapidly adopting nationalist ideas and talking points including racialism and even critiques of

👏18🏆532🎄1

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @DesertDixieAC. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,078,614 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Desert Dixie Active Club” (@DesertDixieAC), 463 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DesertDixieAC.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.