Channel
@DerekJohnsonOfficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
24,379subscribers
-1,675 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001561184542 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DerekJohnsonOfficial |
| Created | 26 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DerekJohnsonOfficial |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Nov 2026, 10:41 | 24,379 | -41 |
| 12 Nov 2026, 03:20 | 24,420 | -15 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 00:49 | 24,435 | -14 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:16 | 24,449 | -16 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:46 | 24,465 | -20 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:19 | 24,485 | -13 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:56 | 24,498 | -13 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:30 | 24,511 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 10:18 | 24,523 | -9 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:54 | 24,532 | -9 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 06:18 | 24,541 | -16 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 24,557 | -10 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:08 | 24,567 | -28 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:09 | 24,595 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 24,611 | -12 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:58 | 24,623 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 24,635 | -27 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:48 | 24,662 | -30 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:20 | 24,692 | -16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 24,708 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 144 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,350 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 526 | 39.0% | |
| 👍 | 434 | 32.1% | |
| 💯 | 125 | 9.26% | |
| 🔥 | 104 | 7.70% | |
| 🤩 | 90 | 6.67% | |
| 👏 | 47 | 3.48% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 0.815% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.296% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 0.222% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 0.222% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.148% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.074% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,350 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟢 ACCEPT YOUR PAYMENT NOW ➡️ https://t.me/QFSAgentMaria ✅️ ⚠️ Due to the latest NESARA-GESARA Payout compliance regulations, this is your FINAL NOTICE. We are required to verify REAL and ACTIVE clients before releasing any payout. ⚠️ Only the first 27 Patriots who reply with “CONFIRM” will remain eligible to receive their official NESARA–GESARA cash-out. This is your last opportunity before your access is permane…
❤30❤🔥1
“Voted Democrat to help out President Trump.” 🤡 That has got to be the stupidest statement I’ve heard in years. That one takes the cake, candles, utensils, tablecloth, chairs, chandelier, flooring, and Maitre d. 📌 Follow 👉 Derek Johnson ✅️ 🔔 SYSTEM NOTICE YOU MUST VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT BEFORE JANUARY BEGINS. OTHERWISE, YOUR PROFILE WILL BE PERMANENTLY ERASED FROM THE SYSTEM. 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅ 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCO
🤩88❤38👍37🏆3💯2
🤭 Follow 👉 Derek Johnson ✅️ 🔔 SYSTEM NOTICE YOU MUST VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT BEFORE JANUARY BEGINS. OTHERWISE, YOUR PROFILE WILL BE PERMANENTLY ERASED FROM THE SYSTEM. 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅ 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅
🔥49❤9⚡3❤🔥3🤩1
They’re showing their true colors more and more. ‘Never Trumper’ term is making a comeback. “Legal Diva and Constitutional Conservative” yet has not one iota clue of a single word from a single sentence from a single paragraph from a single Law invoked… Much less ANYTHING Military Government and Military Law. History will account for this. | 45 ——— 47 | Everyone wants an “opinion” on a subject they know NOTHING…
👍64❤26💯8
Roastedddd like many Americans need. 📌 Follow 👉 Derek Johnson ✅️ 🔔 SYSTEM NOTICE YOU MUST VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT BEFORE JANUARY BEGINS. OTHERWISE, YOUR PROFILE WILL BE PERMANENTLY ERASED FROM THE SYSTEM. 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅ 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅
❤62🔥31👍5❤🔥3
For future deserters of my page: You do realize that once the material is made available, the material you never knew existed, it’s then copied, pasted, stolen, and regurgitated as “someone else’s discovery”… correct? Which the real Joe Biden was known, professionally, as a Plagiarist. Most Senior Level Congressmen stole younger Congressmen material known as Great Ideas and made it theirs. You do realize that’s t…
👍60❤36🔥8
One of the best interviews… “Real Generals not TV Generals” 🫡♠️🇺🇸 Follow 👉 Derek Johnson ✅️ 🔔 SYSTEM NOTICE YOU MUST VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT BEFORE JANUARY BEGINS. OTHERWISE, YOUR PROFILE WILL BE PERMANENTLY ERASED FROM THE SYSTEM. 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅ 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅
👍51❤25
Has anyone seen a single person who’s accused me of everything that the Boss has been accused of with the Boss? You notice his phone being held up? A particular person was on speaker phone… “Man, that guy knows what he’s talking about.” Eye witnesses at Trump International. Timestamped forever in History. Waiting on these “influencers” to be seen in photos anywhere near Trump anything. Waiting on these “influe…
👍80❤49
The last Unconditional Surrender in U.S. History was Japan’s ending WW2. Law of War Manual terms. The irony is… this is easier to believe because the visual is Iran and “conflict.” But all the other Law of War Manual terms that’s been said from 2020 to present day cannot be ignored. You cannot have one Law of War Manual term without the other. Validation. Everyday. If you have “questions for Derek Johnson” you …
👍56❤13🕊2
Notice the clowns? Kevin Steele Hodge Twins Conservative Twins All wanting clicks to boost their algorithms for views that lead to more 👉🏻💩 If people would learn the Officials who provide the SOURCES… THIS is the trash that keeps Americans in the same rut, the past, and doesn’t lead to any sort of elevation of thinking nor does it remotely get close to providing a solution. IF these clowns, and others who share …
💯65❤35👍7🔥4🥰1
🫡♠️🇺🇸 Follow 👉 Derek Johnson ✅️ 🔔 SYSTEM NOTICE YOU MUST VERIFY YOUR ACCOUNT BEFORE JANUARY BEGINS. OTHERWISE, YOUR PROFILE WILL BE PERMANENTLY ERASED FROM THE SYSTEM. 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅ 👉 CONFIRM MY ACCOUNT ✅
👏47❤15❤🔥1
45 ——— 47 IS His Legacy. 📌⚖️ Iran, Somalia, Yemen, Venezuela, Ukraine, all have these things in common: Bill Hillary Obama John Kerry Nancy Pelosi Jimmy Carter Trafficking Money Laundering Executive Orders with National Emergencies by Carter and Obama This is one your family and friends on the fence need to shut up and listen to. Or wait for humble pie. 📌⚖️♠️🇺🇸 Link: https://rumble.com/v76hrcs-45-dash-47-is-his-…
❤76👍14🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @DerekJohnsonOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Derek Johnson” (@DerekJohnsonOfficial), 24,379 subscribers as measured 15 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DerekJohnsonOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.