Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dennis Demori

Channel

Dennis Demori

@DennisDemoriX

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

249subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001328117071
TypeChannel
Username@DennisDemoriX
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DennisDemoriX

Growth

2492572537 August 2026 — 257 subscribers8 August 2026 — 257 subscribers16 August 2026 — 255 subscribers24 August 2026 — 253 subscribers1 September 2026 — 252 subscribers10 September 2026 — 249 subscribers7 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 34 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 248–258 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 19:37249-3
1 Sept 2026, 14:16252-1
24 Aug 2026, 15:28253-2
16 Aug 2026, 06:44255-2
8 Aug 2026, 09:17257no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:52257first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥861.5%
👍323.1%
17.69%
💯17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 February 2024 to 29 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Dec 2025, 22:16 UTC186 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I used to think success meant pushing harder. More hours. More effort. More urgency. But the calm, profitable people I know aren’t doing more. They’re operating with fewer moving parts. Fewer tools. Fewer offers. Fewer priorities. Fewer decisions. Fewer places their attention leaks. Before I take on anything new now, I ask: Does it reduce friction? Does this simplify my life? Does it work without me being “on”

🔥1

23 Dec 2025, 19:10 UTC153 viewsread 8 August 2026

Sometimes I’m writing content half-awake with my 1-year old running into my office. And somehow the business still moves forward. Not because I’m “hustling harder”… But because the systems I built don’t care how much sleep I got. When life gets chaotic, you need workflows that work even on your worst days.

23 Dec 2025, 00:52 UTC140 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

The fastest way to make progress as a solo operator isn’t adding tactics. It’s removing decisions you keep re-deciding every week. Fewer decisions → more momentum

1

22 Dec 2025, 00:16 UTC144 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Most people don’t lose in business or investing because they’re reckless. They lose because their systems force decisions at the worst possible moments. (A short thread on how I think about money, work, and risk.) — For a long time, I thought the problem was effort. Work harder. Pay more attention. Stay sharper than everyone else. That worked — until it didn’t. Because effort doesn’t fail all at once. It fails

🔥1

19 Dec 2025, 21:32 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I re-learned this the hard way: When you depend on one client, you don’t run a business. You have a job with no benefits. Stability comes from having options — not putting all your eggs in one basket.

🔥4

19 Dec 2025, 03:40 UTC100 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

If you run a one-person business, you don’t need 100 tactics. You need 3 systems: • A client acquisition rhythm • A simple offer + product ladder • A daily execution checklist Everything else is noise.

🔥2

18 Dec 2025, 17:25 UTC95 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I just realized I can turn reactions on, so you can do that under my posts now

👍3💯1

16 Dec 2025, 17:31 UTC101 viewsread 8 August 2026

Quick head’s up: I restarted my weekly Guardian Digest. It’s short, calm notes on crypto risk, execution, and decision-making — not predictions or hype. Mostly how I think about protecting the downside when things are uncertain. If that’s useful, you can subscribe here: https://birdsend.page/forms/1979/jQ4ufYiTrI

14 Dec 2025, 19:31 UTCviews —

Dennis Demori pinned «I shared this on Twitter recently, but I wanted to post it here too — because it explains why my work has shifted so much over the last few years. If you’ve ever felt like you’re starting from zero every month, this might resonate. — There was a moment when…»

14 Dec 2025, 19:31 UTC123 viewsread 8 August 2026

I shared this on Twitter recently, but I wanted to post it here too — because it explains why my work has shifted so much over the last few years. If you’ve ever felt like you’re starting from zero every month, this might resonate. — There was a moment when I stopped thinking of myself as “just a freelancer” And started building assets that could pay me over and over. For years, I thought freedom meant: Work har

14 Dec 2025, 19:21 UTCviews —

Dennis Demori pinned «Hey — it’s been a while. Before we head into 2026, I wanted to send a quick reset on what I’m doing, what I’m building, and what you can expect from me going forward. For years, most people followed me for email marketing, direct response, or client acquisition…»

12 Dec 2025, 16:30 UTC151 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hey — it’s been a while. Before we head into 2026, I wanted to send a quick reset on what I’m doing, what I’m building, and what you can expect from me going forward. For years, most people followed me for email marketing, direct response, or client acquisition tips. Useful stuff — but honestly, it wasn’t the full picture of how I actually run my business or my life. Over the past year I learned something the har

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DennisDemoriX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dennis Demori” (@DennisDemoriX), 249 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DennisDemoriX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.