Channel
@Denis_review
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry
189subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001553614870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Denis_review |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Denis_review |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 21:59 | 189 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 190 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 190 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 17 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
❗️Every day I get messages from people who have been hesitant for a long time, but have decided to try. Their stories are similar to each other: at first they were afraid, they did not believe, they thought that trading was too complicated.❗️ ➡️But then they enter their first trade, repeating my signals, and everything changes. They see their deposit grow without guesswork, without chaos, without unnecessary risks. …
💎 Every time I read the reviews from participants of the PRO Trading Club, I'm convinced of one thing: the right system is everything. 💎 ❗️ People who have been trying trading for years, losing money, and not understanding how to get into profit come to me and start earning consistently within a week. ❗️ 💵 They haven't become smarter in this short time. They haven't magically changed. They simply started working wi…
✨If you could see the chats of the PRO club members, you would understand one simple thing: people are really making money and can’t stop.✨ 💥Their emotions are excitement, surprise, even shock. They didn’t expect it to be so easy. A person who has never traded before joins the club, makes their first trade, and immediately locks in a profit. They continue trading and see consistent growth. Within a week, they are f…
📣If you’re not in the PRO Trading Club yet, I have some exciting news for you: there’s a real buzz happening right now.📣 People are entering trades, locking in profits, discussing strategies, and sharing their results. Some have made their first $1,000 in their lives, while others are finally in the green after a series of setbacks. ⚡️I read their messages and realize how powerfully the system works. Just a week ag…
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @Denis_review. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Denis Review” (@Denis_review), 189 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Denis_review.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.