Channel

Delivers国际短信销售＆拨喜语音频道

@Delivers_BX

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

264subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001753456607
Type	Channel
Username	@Delivers_BX
Created	Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	8 August 2026
Last confirmed live	7 October 2026
Measurements held	9
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 7 October 2026
On Telegram	t.me/Delivers_BX

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9 measurements spanning 61 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 260–296 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
7 Oct 2026, 14:19	264	-2
27 Sept 2026, 00:38	266	-3
14 Sept 2026, 03:00	269	-4
6 Sept 2026, 09:59	273	-10
29 Aug 2026, 14:34	283	-2
23 Aug 2026, 08:06	285	-3
16 Aug 2026, 07:47	288	-4
8 Aug 2026, 08:16	292	no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:56	292	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
❤	8	47.1%
👍	7	41.2%
🔥	2	11.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2024 to 12 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Nov 2024, 01:24 UTC≈1,660 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🏆优惠大放送！快闪活动！！🏆 第四季度价格大优惠；现推出短信、语音优惠促销‼️💰 为回馈广大老客户的一直支持和信任，本公司推出海内外语音、短信推广活动： 🏆🏆最新巴西高质量短信路由🏆🏆0.09RMB（包数据）、0.07RMB（不包数据）~ 代理请私聊 ❤️电信联通卡发❤️ BC 0.32RMB 色播0.33RMB（不接空降）专属客服 @ssccyy88 中国语音推广： 1、坐席费永久免除坐席费（原本200rmb/月） 2、AI机器人免費（原本500rmb/月） 3、长期有效！欢迎测试！！ 🌸中国博彩、棋牌内容（手拨）：1.1 rmb/分钟(国际显号,65,8869,+1,港险852）额外沖1萬送 100 🌸中国博彩、棋牌内容（群呼）：1 rmb/分钟(国际显号,65,8869,+1）额外沖1萬送 100 🌸中国贷款、催收: 2 rmb/分钟 🌸印度：0.22rmb/分钟（本地显号） 🌸菲律宾BC:0…

❤5👍2🔥2

Signed Smith Jer

11 Nov 2024, 02:18 UTC≈1,140 viewsread 8 August 2026

Signed Smith Jer

10 Nov 2024, 01:50 UTC701 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Signed Smith Jer

4 Nov 2024, 08:20 UTC584 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❤1👍1

Signed Klin J

28 Oct 2024, 06:21 UTC529 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

❤1👍1

Signed Klin J

24 Oct 2024, 06:34 UTC489 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Signed Klin J

23 Oct 2024, 03:25 UTC397 viewsread 8 August 2026

Signed Klin J

21 Oct 2024, 10:59 UTC367 viewsread 8 August 2026

Signed Klin J

11 Oct 2024, 01:07 UTC519 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👍2❤1

Signed Smith Jer

7 Oct 2024, 01:27 UTC433 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Signed Smith Jer

6 Oct 2024, 01:29 UTC318 viewsread 8 August 2026

Signed Smith Jer

30 Sept 2024, 01:34 UTC341 viewsread 8 August 2026

Signed Smith Jer

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Delivers_BX. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

荣耀代发点这里👉联系ry88532
@ac6675 · 762 posts

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

tccpspoi123
@tccpspoi123 · 57 posts

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Handles this channel named that no longer answer

Dead references: 1; handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone: 0; we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive: 1; vacant every time we have ever looked

@Delivers_BX named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.

Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.

Never seen alive

References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.

@marklam999
named in 20 posts, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Delivers国际短信销售＆拨喜语音频道” (@Delivers_BX), 264 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Delivers_BX.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.