$UBER looks good, nice chart and nice floor. Aped some feel like next leg coming. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x5b063f2b7bcf17f1c7d734b2b2382f5552071cf1
❤6

Channel
@DejavuGemss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
160subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001637204421 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DejavuGemss |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 16 October 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DejavuGemss |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 160 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:50 | 160 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 December 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
109 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 51 | 46.8% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 18.3% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 13.8% | |
| 🥰 | 10 | 9.17% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 7.34% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 2.75% | |
| 💩 | 2 | 1.83% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2022 to 22 December 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$UBER looks good, nice chart and nice floor. Aped some feel like next leg coming. https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x5b063f2b7bcf17f1c7d734b2b2382f5552071cf1
❤6
Ath is 50k mc this could reverse from here 3k mc dip now. Dev still working. Im to Holding https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x94cf0893c9502b42b4a17899eea2e931988e276e https://t.me/ScroogeERC
👍1
Aped this chad Just launched 1.8k https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x0adcc80c7c0f4a307e89a328b30798b5f4172f24 https://t.me/FortuneCoinERC20
👍2❤1
Im aped this safe dev 1kmc https://poocoin.app/tokens/0x927a78fc19c24e74de5de630e2c3a366eb7b019e https://t.me/ezcatcoin NFA/DYOR
I Aped Safe Dev Carnage is the dev previous projects 500k https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x6bbd0deaa416b9d1159bb6702f1dcc7ce8c6e2b0 40k https://t.me/mattecaterc
🔥4👍2💩2
Aped a bag here 25k mc, good name. DYOR!!! https://t.me/TheDogeProtocolETH https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0xd3a8F20775Ae7443Cf1Ef6C5Bdea612f470Df80a
❤1🔥1
@TheChadERC $CHADS THE PLANNING TO BUILD A BOT THAT CAN DETECT NEW PROJECT THAT IS RENOUNCED AND LOCKED THIS WILL HELP $CHADS TO FIND ALPHA PLAYS EVERYDAY! https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0x1a544ca5a364df065e68928ee627895f7bd4c4b2 ✅ CONTRACT RENOUNCED ✅ LOW TAX 3% BUY AND SELL ✅ LOCK FOR 30DAYS AND WILL EXTEND MORE NEVER MISS THIS $CHADS
🔥3❤1
Utility THE Ape scans out all keywords from influencer tweets(such as Vitalik, Elon etc) and detects deployed contracts with those key words You have to hold a certain amount so make sure to check with the telegram
👏2🔥1
Heard safe. But time your entry https://www.dextools.io/app/en/ether/pair-explorer/0x022Fc2253B79ab7855CCAb8342f6931581c80aef https://t.me/THEAPESERC
🔥2👏1
Almost 5x here nice Chart
👍3🤩3🥰1
Also Waiting this one tho, some alpha chads there. I think will be really sniped... https://t.me/redpilleth DYOR
❤3🔥3👍2🥰1
it has antibot and I am not sure that it is this contract. be careful if you are buying and do your own DYOR
🔥3❤2👍2🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DejavuGemss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 999,613 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DejavuGemss named 9 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Stevent” (@DejavuGemss), 160 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DejavuGemss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.