Channel
@DefiPortfolio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
216subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001242202827 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DefiPortfolio |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DefiPortfolio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 216 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 216 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
61 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 23 | 37.7% | |
| ❤ | 21 | 34.4% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 18.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 3.28% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2022 to 4 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
==Xi--AI== Last known BTC price (March 3, 2025): $94248.35 Predicted BTC price for March 4, 2025, 4:00 PM PST: $89097.17 Predicted price movement: down by $5151.18 Condition: assuming stable market conditions (no major news or volatility spikes) Note: Prediction has an MAE of $2055.79, so actual price may vary.
❤7
Thị trường tiền điện tử đang trải qua một giai đoạn đầy biến động, và câu hỏi đặt ra là liệu chúng ta có đang bước vào một xu hướng giảm tiếp theo hay không. Để trả lời câu hỏi này, chúng ta cần xem xét nhiều yếu tố, từ tình hình thị trường hiện tại, ý kiến của các chuyên gia, đến bối cảnh kinh tế vĩ mô rộng lớn hơn. Dưới đây là một phân tích chi tiết về vấn đề này. Tình hình thị trường hiện tại Trong những tháng gầ…
❤1
Kết luận Dựa trên các yếu tố trên, có thể thấy rằng thị trường tiền điện tử đang ở trong một giai đoạn bất ổn, với nhiều dấu hiệu cho thấy một xu hướng giảm có thể tiếp tục. Giá Bitcoin giảm xuống dưới 90.000 USD, tâm lý sợ hãi trên thị trường, và các sự kiện tiêu cực như vụ hack Bybit là những bằng chứng rõ ràng. Tuy nhiên, không phải tất cả đều là tiêu cực. Các yếu tố như sự phê duyệt của quỹ ETF, các hợp tác mới c…
My 1st chance was with ETH. I see my 2nd chance with SOL now 🤫🫣
❤1
Signed xilatleo
Sol pump. Meme cũng x to qua nay. Thơm bơ.
❤2
Signed xilatleo
https://t.me/OMore0
Signed xilatleo
https://x.com/berachain/status/1745445979913080908?s=46&t=mhI6jCgfLVuLG0nLROBiAw Một trong những con 99% là có token, vì thấy chúng bán saft cho nhau. Rãnh thì vọc, biết đâu sau có air
❤3👍3
Signed xilatleo
Nghe nói hạn cuối để SEC chấp thuận BTC ETF là tháng 1 này. Tưởng tượng khoảnh khắc có tin SEC từ chối ETF thì nến BTC sẽ ntn 🤓
👍4
Signed xilatleo
https://x.com/TheCryptoDog/status/1740367486087004530?s=20
Signed xilatleo
Twitter của tui dạo này… 😵💫 Share 1 cái tổng hợp rồi từ từ làm, đỡ phải kiếm lung tung https://twitter.com/crypthoem/status/1640819860060905474?s=46&t=mhI6jCgfLVuLG0nLROBiAw
Signed xilatleo
https://twitter.com/zksync/status/1639251197898129408?s=46&t=mhI6jCgfLVuLG0nLROBiAw Chính thức mainnet. Lo mà “trải nghiệm” thôi ae. Dự là vài tháng nữa sẽ có air
❤2
Signed xilatleo
Đồng quan điểm 😎
❤5👍2🤨1
Signed xilatleo
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DefiPortfolio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 712,130 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Defi Portfolio” (@DefiPortfolio), 216 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DefiPortfolio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.