Channel
@Defense_for_Jesus
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
50subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003642542058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Defense_for_Jesus |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Defense_for_Jesus |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 50 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:00 | 43 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 43 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 44 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 758 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
⚜۵ دقیقه تأمل | تلنگری خودمانی⚜ در نظر دارم گهگاهی بر روی جملات تکان دهنده کتاب (تاکتیک های گفتگوی هنگام بشارت) تعمق و تفکری کنیم خلاصه ای از صفحه ۵ و ۶ این کتاب بهمراه خرده کنایه هایی بعنوان کسی که خود در بشارت ها، لازم میدانم اشاره کنم. در فصل اول این کتاب اینطور نتیجه از خلاصه اول مطلب میگیرم : در حین (دفاع از ایمان - الهیات دفاعی - بشارت) معمولاً گمان میبریم که بایستی حتماً نبردی داشته باشیم که در آن پیروزی کسب…
گاهی نیز فکر میکنیم که اگر همه چیز را بدانیم، دیگر رسالت ما تمام است! باید اول این را درک کنیم که دانستن صرف کافی نیست ، حتی شیطان هم کتاب مقدس- علم لدنی و تقریباً تمام زد و بندهای امورات دنیوی و روحانی را دست خوش آگاهی است؛ این را در ابتدا و قبل از دانش کسب کردن بدانیم که آیا روح و قلب ما نیز آماده محبت به همنوعانمان است یا فقط در پی تبلیغ و بشارتی هستیم که فکرمیکنیم درست است و خدا را خشنود میسازد ؟ نکته مهم اگر ما…
هر چی بیشتر با مسلمون حرف میزنم بیشتر میفهمم که اسلام با سفسطه زندهاست:/
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
و پاسخ های حقیر به شبهه ایشان
سلام علیکم ایه ای ک میگه عیسی گفته قبل ابراهیم هستم دلالتی بر الوهیت ندارد زیرا عیسی مسیح ع دارای دوشخصیت است یک حقیقی و یک حقوقی شخصیت حقیقی ان همان شخصیتی که با آن مواجه شدند و میشویم ینی همون شخصیتی که با او غذا خوردند زندگی کردند و و ... او هم برایشان معجزه و موعظه میکرد ،پس این شخصیت حقیقی عیسی است ک این شخصیت حقیقی خود دارای دو جنبه است، یک جنبه لاهوتی که معجزه از ان مثل بوده اند یک جنبه ناسوتی که غذا خوردن و ا…
با عرض سلام و شب بخیر این سوال عزیزمسلمانی که شخص عزیزی هستند و نسبت به متن انجیل یوحنا ۸:۵۸ اشکالی وارد کردند ، در چهار ویس پاسخ ایشان رو دادم موضوع این بود که عیسی اگر در انجیل فرموده که ( قبل از ابراهیم هستم ) این یک موضوعی هست که به شخصیت حقوقی ایشان مربوطه و ... ادامه در ویس ها پاسخ دادم خدمت این بزرگوار امیدوارم به شما نیز کمکی کرده باشم ⚜𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐈 𝐃𝐎𝐔𝐁𝐓⚜
📚 تاکتیکهای گفتگو هنگام بشارت ✍گرگ کوکل —این اثر به قلم مدافعان راه حقیقت، بانی چنل کلید کلیسا نگارش و جمعبندی شده است برای ایمانداران مسیحی ، توصیه میشود ⚜ 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐞𝐥 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐬 ⚜
⚜ ضمیمه پایانی فصل تثلیث ⚜ ❓چرا بسیاری از نقدهای وارد بر تثلیث، از نظر منطقی معتبر نیستند؟ نقد زمانی ارزشمند است که متوجه دیدگاه واقعی طرف باشد اگر کسی ابتدا عقیدهای را تحریف کند و سپس همان تصویر تحریف شده را رد نماید، در حقیقت آن عقیده را نقد نکرده او تراوشات ذهن خود را نقد کرده است! متأسفانه بخش بزرگی از اشکالاتی که دربارهٔ تثلیث مطرح میشود اینگونه است بهتر است کمی با شیوه تحریف کنندگان حقیقت در این بخش پست آش…
لینک گپِ جدید چنل سوالاتتون رو میتونید مشترک کنید❣ ⚜ 𝐓𝐑𝐈𝐁𝐔𝐍𝐀𝐋 𝐐𝐔𝐀𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍𝐔𝐌 ⚜
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Defense_for_Jesus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 988,167 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“⚜𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐈 𝐃𝐎𝐔𝐁𝐓⚜” (@Defense_for_Jesus), 50 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Defense_for_Jesus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.