Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Deep Operations Group

Channel

Deep Operations Group

@Deep_Operations_Group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,848subscribers

-1,622 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002966216403
TypeChannel
Username@Deep_Operations_Group
DescriptionEven the flap of a butterfly's wing can cause a tsunami on the other side of the world. A feedback bot for the project team @ID_Feedback_bot Deep Operations Club t.me/Operations_ID
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held66
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Deep_Operations_Group

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

10,05912,47111,26510,8486 August 202610 November 2026
66 measurements spanning 97 days, net -1,622. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,697–12,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 17:0710,848-302
9 Nov 2026, 07:3711,150-35
7 Nov 2026, 22:4811,185-27
6 Nov 2026, 23:0711,212-34
5 Nov 2026, 20:4111,246-24
4 Nov 2026, 22:4511,270-8
4 Nov 2026, 00:2811,278-17
3 Nov 2026, 02:5811,295-9
2 Nov 2026, 03:0811,304-23
1 Nov 2026, 06:2011,327-91
31 Oct 2026, 03:3611,418-39
30 Oct 2026, 01:5711,457-33
29 Oct 2026, 00:1711,490-38
28 Oct 2026, 00:4411,528-44
26 Oct 2026, 22:5711,572-22
26 Oct 2026, 01:0011,594+323
24 Oct 2026, 22:0111,271-14
24 Oct 2026, 01:3011,285-29
23 Oct 2026, 03:2911,314-22
22 Oct 2026, 01:1611,336first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 7 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
141.0%
avg views ÷ 10,848 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,300
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held25 (7 May 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total15,300
Reactions total204
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 22:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
73
Videos
25
Links
57

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
4m 23s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,302 reactions across 25 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,24837.8%
👍1,05932.1%
❤73322.2%
✍551.67%
💯411.24%
🤔401.21%
🫡371.12%
👏320.969%
⚡170.515%
❤‍🔥90.273%
🤬90.273%
🤝40.121%
👀30.091%
🥰30.091%
🏆20.061%
🤩20.061%
🤯20.061%
🤷‍♂20.061%
👨‍💻10.03%
😍10.03%
2 further kinds20.061%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 7 May 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
202
across the posts below
Posts paid on
24
of 25 we hold a reading for · 96%
Most on one post
134
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Deep_Operations_Group. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 May 2026 to 13 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (100.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

13 Oct 2026, 13:33 UTC≈15,300 views204 reactions25 Starsread 11 November 2026
Video

🫰Корни дестабилизации. Часть первая Мадридский клуб, сколоченный в октябре 2001 года на волне высокомерного триумфа Запада, изначально задумывался как элитный отстойник для отработанного политического материала. За ширмой пафосных разговоров о демократии испанские элиты во главе с Фелипе Гонсалесом, при щедрой финансовой накачке из США и ЕС, создали карманную ассамблею влиятельных политических пенсионеров. Сегодня…

🔥124👍51❤12💯7✍5🫡5

5 Oct 2026, 17:02 UTC≈11,900 views175 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

🫰«Говорит и показывает Москва» Пишет Вам «Уставший» из мест где жизнь удивляет по новому, но прошлое в тебе еще помнит как надо и не надо. Сняв свои погоны и лишь иногда приятно вспоминая прошлое за кружечкой вкусного стаута в кругу тех, кто продолжает путь опричника, часто всплывает один очень наболевший вопрос. С каких пор уходя на покой, стало позволительным показывать и рассказывать про организацию, её формы и …

👍85🔥47❤21💯17🤝4🙏1

30 Sept 2026, 12:27 UTC≈13,800 views168 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍90🔥64❤11⚡3

23 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈13,500 views126 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026

🫰Бал сатаны Один небезызвестный террорист (как мы уже поняли, достаточно активно нас читающий) днями ранее поздравил другого уже небезызвестного террориста с 46-летием, офицера ГУРа, Пращука Виталия Юрьевича, который за относительно небольшой период времени из подполковника стал целым генералом украинской разведки. Поздравление в одной из соцсетей было символично представлено фотографией самого Пращука В.Ю. в окруж…

❤68👍27🔥22🫡5✍3😍1

14 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC≈25,100 views138 reactions5 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🫰Несуществующий «спецпиздроздил» часть 2 Базовым подразделением для прокси «Шаманбат» является подразделение ГУР «Кракен*», в том числе через «Кракен*» осуществляется рекрутинг для работы в странах Африки. Основателем и руководителем подразделения «Кракен*», а также прокси «Шаманбат» являлся и является сотрудник ГУР Пращук Виталий Юрьевич, в открытых источниках известный под вымышленным позывным «Вито». Еще в 2015…

❤59👍44🔥21✍8🤔6

14 Sept 2026, 12:33 UTC≈14,800 views148 reactions5 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🫰Несуществующий «спецпиздроздел» часть 1 В день празднования разведки на Украине ГУРом был опубликован ряд фотографий, которыми противник «пафосно» заявил о проведении успешных спец операций на африканском континенте. На протяжении развития проекта мы рассказывали вам о тематики прокси и о том, каким образом данная тенденция используется противником для противодействия России зарубежом. О своей деятельности на терр…

👍71🔥38❤23👏8✍5👀2🏆1

7 Sept 2026, 14:46 UTC≈51,400 views115 reactions5 Starsread 11 November 2026

🫰Для тех кто сомневался Подпишись чтобы не было сомнений 🤝Deep Operations Group🤝 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

❤48👍30🔥19⚡8🤔5🤬4🫡1

7 Sept 2026, 09:06 UTC≈16,600 views230 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

🤝Deep Operations Group🤝 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

🔥132👍80❤11❤‍🔥4👏3

4 Sept 2026, 13:17 UTC≈13,700 views71 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Photo

🤝Корпорация зла. Часть 1 Ранее мы писали , что одним из бенефициаров террора в России является украинец сирийского происхождения Халед Альфайоми. Деятельность Х.Альфайоми достигла по истине внушительных масштабов, об этом он открыто хвастается в своих социальных сетях, заявляя о прямой причастности к атакам на гражданскую инфраструктуру России. Но как мы знаем, у каждого пути есть свое начало. Альма-матером, давши…

🔥34👍15❤11🤔7🫡3✍1

31 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC≈56,500 views100 reactions1 Starread 11 November 2026
Video

🫰Стеганография Это один из способов когда информация прячется внутри обычной картинки, аудио, видео или сетевого трафика, без особого внимания всё выглядит совершенно безобидно. Оперативная группа может передать донесение, координаты, ключ или инструкцию, встроив их в обычный контент. Например фотографии, музыкальный файл или к примеру видеоролик который Вы сейчас смотрите и слушаете, выглядит все как обычный конте…

👍60❤18🔥12✍5👏4🏆1

25 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC≈20,800 views326 reactions134 Starsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🤝Deep Operations Group🤝 ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️

🔥186❤78👍49⚡5✍3🥰2🫡2💯1

12 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC≈11,500 views57 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @TactclTactcTactctn

Интересное происходит внезапно в Ливии. За последние два дня в стране произошли взрывы на одном из крупнейших нефтехранилищ, а также на территории подконтрольной Хафтару совершено убийство главы разведывательной службы. События идут слишком кучно, чтобы воспринимать их в отрыве друг от друга, однако на текущий момент нет иной фактуры. Нефтехранилище в Эз-Завии находится под контролем западного правительства. Но вря…

❤28👍18🔥6🤔4👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @Deep_Operations_Group. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Deep Operations Group” (@Deep_Operations_Group), 10,848 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Deep_Operations_Group.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.