Channel
@DeepSubtext
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
436subscribers
-35 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003681304888 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DeepSubtext |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DeepSubtext |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 436 | -35 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 471 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 471 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (27 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,026 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
48 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 22.9% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 20.8% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 18.8% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 12.5% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 6.25% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 4.17% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
OMA — коллектив из Манчестера, который превращает хип-хоп в современную камерную музыку. Если бы симфонический оркестр появился сегодня, а не триста лет назад, возможно, он звучал бы именно так. Они берут треки, на которых выросло целое поколение: MF DOOM, Nas, Wu-Tang Clan, 2Pac, Nujabes и вытаскивают из них живую гармонию, отсекая всё лишнее, как это делал великий скульптор Огюст Роден: «Я беру глыбу мрамора и от…
🔥4❤🔥2
Kavinsky, в реальной жизни — Венсан Белорже, на днях скончался у себя дома в возрасте 50 лет. Но он успел оставить след не только в электронной музыке, но и в истории кинематографа. Именно его Nightcall стал визитной карточкой фильма «Драйв», через которую мы почувствовали глубину героя Райана Гослинга. Это история человека, опустошенного изнутри, разрываемого противоречиями, но отчаянно пытающегося стать лучше. Не…
🫡3💔2
У Виктории Канал с рождения нет части руки. Но удивительно не это. Удивительно то, что спустя несколько песен ты вообще перестаешь об этом думать. В мире, где любой физический дефект давно превратился бы в главный маркетинговый инструмент, она сделала ставку на противоположное. Не на жалость. Не на громкую историю. Не на образ человека, который «вдохновляет». Она сделала ставку на музыку. Полностью игнорируя свою фи…
❤2💔2🔥2
La vita è bella / Life Is Beautiful / «Жизнь прекрасна» 1997 Есть фильмы, после которых хочется стать лучше. «Жизнь прекрасна» не только о войне. Она о человеке, чья ценность измеряется не достатком и не силой, а поступками. О любви, которая проявляется не в красивых словах, а в ежедневной готовности жертвовать собой ради тех, кто тебе дорог. Когда жизнь отнимает привычный мир, остаются лишь характер, доброта и вн…
❤🔥3
Маша Sotsfucker из Йошкар-Олы создает настоящие произведения искусства вручную. Ее коллажи, это не просто вырезки из журналов, а истории, собранные из воспоминаний, кино, музыки и эмоций. Часы работы, которые выливаются в секунды искреннего удовольствия. Этот коллаж объединяет эстетику нулевых, любовь двух людей из фильма «Вечное сияние чистого разума» и настроение песни Скриптонита «Это любовь». Казалось бы, соверш…
❤🔥3❤2👏1
Во «Во все тяжкие» мы встречаем уже готового Сола Гудмана — циничного адвоката, который всегда найдет лазейку и продаст свою совесть подороже. Но «Лучше звоните Солу» — совсем не про это. Это история Джимми Макгилла, человека, которого жизнь раз за разом бросает в грязь, но он продолжает вставать. И самое важное здесь даже не талант, а стержень и один-единственный человек, который искренне в него верил. Иногда этого …
❤4💯3👍2
Tout le Monde en Parle стали феноменом последних пары лет. Почему? Да потому что это музыка не для алгоритмов ТикТока, а для удовольствия. Французы традиционно умеют удивлять творчеством. Их успех парадоксален. Слушатель устал от артистов, которые круглосуточно продают свою личность через сторис, интервью и бесконечные объяснения. Сегодня роскошью становится загадка. Когда исполнитель оставляет пространство для инте…
❤🔥3❤2💔2
Посмотрел «Майкла» с надеждой увидеть историю величайшего поп-артиста современности. Но вместо глубокого разговора о личности получил около красивый, безопасный пересказ биографии. Где величайший артист предстаёт перед нами, как человек морально слабый, под гнётом своего отца. Но разве может такой великий артист быть слабым? Нет, не только не может, он таким не являлся! Фильм почти не пытается объяснить, почему Майк…
💔3💯3
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @DeepSubtext. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 210,573 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Subtext” (@DeepSubtext), 436 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeepSubtext.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.