Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

{Архив} 𝕯𝖊𝖆𝖙𝖍

@Death_AngelRadio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004488481605
TypeChannel
Username@Death_AngelRadio
DescriptionКанал привязан к @AngelRadioSetka .
Created20 June 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Death_AngelRadio

Growth

179 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17 subscribers9 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–18 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 20:4517no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:0017first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026
Posts held13 (20 June 202617 July 2026)
Views total
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1052.6%
🥰526.3%
👍421.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 17 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Jun 2026, 21:17 UTC65 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

💀Roleplay post Смерть вздохнул, подняв взгляд, окидывая им старого друга. — До твоего прихода всё было вполне нормально. Сейчас — терпимо. — Он отпил колы. — В отличие от кое-кого, я и вправду занят важным делом, поэтому — да, «пашу». — Склонив голову набок, как-то даже по-вороньему, он устало заглянул в чужие глаза. Чак всегда быстро его выматывал своей энергичностью. — Нет, не думал и не буду, но мне интересно,

🥰3

21 Jun 2026, 15:01 UTC65 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

💀Roleplay post. Обычный день, обычный город в Америке, обычное кафе, обычные посетители, ну, за исключением одного... Смерть сидел в дальнем углу, пробуя только что принесённую ему пиццу. Неплохо, и всё же — не сравнится с той, что была в Чикаго. Мужчина вздохнул, почувствовав рядом ещё одну вселенскую сущность. Оборачиваться не стал, лишь запил пиццу колой.

🥰1

21 Jun 2026, 14:47 UTC68 viewsread 11 August 2026

У тебя всегда было хрупкое эго. Разве? Мне казалось, тебе только и нужно внимание. Не соглашусь, но спорить с тобой бессмысленно, так что закроем тему. Адм.: иногда я и вправду ощущаю себя на весь возраст Смерти.

21 Jun 2026, 13:13 UTC53 viewsread 11 August 2026

Я и не переживаю. Надеюсь, что нет.

21 Jun 2026, 11:28 UTC51 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ты бы пошёл против мира, из-за ситуации в которой ты был бы прав? Наглеж — обращаться ко мне на «ты». Нет. Я так же не могу представить, какая такая ситуация могла бы заставить меня пойти против мира — для меня это ни к чему, ваш мир ничтожен по сравнению с моими заботами. Да и Чак не обрадуется, а я не намерен слушать очередные его истерики.

🥰1

21 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC44 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Сколько вам лет? Можете сказать если помните?) Я уже давно перестал считать свой возраст — это бессмысленное занятие.

👍4

21 Jun 2026, 10:53 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А я-то как не ожидал себя тут увидеть.

3

21 Jun 2026, 10:26 UTC47 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Убей бога, пожалуйста. Какого из? Богов много. Если же Вы имеете в виду Бога, то не беспокойтесь: рано или поздно я и его пожну, но досрочно убивать не буду — это нарушит естественный ход вещей, особенно смерть такой сущности, как Бог.

4

21 Jun 2026, 10:23 UTC44 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Подмечать мой возраст странно, учитывая, что ты в этом плане не лучше. К счастью — да. А ты всё так же рад устраивать клоунаду лишь на потеху публике. Сомневаюсь, что в том, чтобы пытаться понять твои замыслы, есть смысл.

3

20 Jun 2026, 21:07 UTC48 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩 💀«𝖂𝖊𝖑𝖑 𝕴 𝖆𝖒 𝕯𝖊𝖆𝖙𝖍, 𝖓𝖔𝖓𝖊 𝖈𝖆𝖓 𝖊𝖝𝖈𝖊𝖑. / 𝕴'𝖑𝖑 𝖔𝖕𝖊𝖓 𝖙𝖍𝖊 𝖉𝖔𝖔𝖗 𝖙𝖔 𝖍𝖊𝖆𝖛𝖊𝖓 𝖔𝖗 𝖍𝖊𝖑𝖑.» 🤩🤩 Я не видел никакого смысла в создании этого, но меня "заставил" Чак. 🤩🤩 Можете испытать удачу, попробовав задать мне вопрос. 🤩🤩 Лучше уж загляните к другим и не тратьте мое время. 🤩🤩🤩🤩

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @Death_AngelRadio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 194,138 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“{Архив} 𝕯𝖊𝖆𝖙𝖍” (@Death_AngelRadio), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Death_AngelRadio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.