Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dean's Radar

Channel

Dean's Radar

@Deans100xcalls

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

366subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002284723163
TypeChannel
Username@Deans100xcalls
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Deans100xcalls

Growth

3643663657 August 2026 — 365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 364 subscribers8 August 2026 — 364 subscribers15 August 2026 — 366 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 364–366 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 19:15366+2
8 Aug 2026, 06:32364no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:06364-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:30365first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
38.2%
avg views ÷ 366 subscribers
Avg views / post
140
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (2 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,793
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4737.0%
👀1713.4%
💯1713.4%
👍1612.6%
👏1411.0%
❤‍🔥75.51%
🫡53.94%
😁43.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC111 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ethprices

🟢 1920$

❤‍🔥1👀1

6 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC121 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Everything Pumping Back 🐸

🔥5👏2👍1💯1

5 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC123 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I'm convinced with its adoption, a good bet where we see 100 larps daily will share with you all soon, let's Cook🙏

🔥8👍5👀1👏1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC126 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👀1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC123 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BeachCalls

My first share of $CASHCAT was 7-8m mc. Since then it hit an ATH of ~220m mc and a full retrace back to ~30m mc It’s back around 90m and mega whales are buying it up. I genuinely think with a little patience this hits the Billions level. RobinHood have unparalleled money, investors, network. The FOMO on RobinHood chain if CASHCAT can get listed will be insane. I took profits on the first run up, I kept a bag, I’v

🔥3👀1💯1

5 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC126 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

GM Champs I see a Season 2 for RH, hopefully volume will be in our favor😋

🔥2❤‍🔥1👀1💯1

4 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC136 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Speak in emoji language 🤑

🔥9👏6😁3👍1

4 Aug 2026, 13:23 UTC135 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

For Base the volume is still low so don't expect anything to make it quickly whether it's a micro or a macro cap play

💯4🔥1🫡1

4 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC136 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

They have been shipping some good stuff 🤪

👀4🔥2👍1

4 Aug 2026, 11:31 UTC123 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @hatoriinvestments

New launches are just so dangerous to hold I will bet on the battle tested teams who building for months… market is shit but eventually it will turned and I think some of those plays will be winners

💯5

4 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC127 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

One thing I'm watching... Cashcat. If it manages to reclaim a major market cap again, I wouldn't be surprised to see confidence to return across Robinhood. There are already good projects building there. The missing piece is liquidity. That's what I'm waiting for 👀

👍4💯4👏2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Deans100xcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dean's Radar” (@Deans100xcalls), 366 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Deans100xcalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.