Channel
@DeadRussianSoldiers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,050subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001557342431 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DeadRussianSoldiers |
| Description | Russia invaded Ukraine on 24 Feb 2022. Clearly Russian casualties are greater than kremlin anticipated. Only look at their faces, they are young, untrained and innocent. Putin just sends them to death evey day without any support. !! Containes GRAPHICS !! |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DeadRussianSoldiers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 3,050 | no change |
| 26 Sept 2026, 09:47 | 3,050 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 25 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
102 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 42.2% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 18.6% | |
| 🤡 | 19 | 18.6% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 8.82% | |
| 🤬 | 8 | 7.84% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 3.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2025 to 5 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/2007655339521642543 Distance Measuring Equipment (DME) calculates the slant range distance between an aircraft and a ground station by timing the round trip of radio signals. Radio line-of-sight is required for both systems, with ranges up to 200 km depending on the aircraft altitude. 3/ 6:58 AM · Jan 4, 2026 · 8,912 Views https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/2007655342075982271 Sources…
❤12🤬1
https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/2007655334656245846 The azimuth (radial angle) from the UAV to the station is determined by the phase difference between the reference signal and the narrowly directed variable signal. This may be paired with DME (Distance Measuring Equipment) for a full position fix, independent of GPS. 2/ 6:58 AM · Jan 4, 2026 · 19.8K Views
🤬1
https://x.com/GrandpaRoy2/status/2007655328855572893 Roy🇨🇦 @GrandpaRoy2 This Russian “Geran-2” (Shahed) has a new antenna, apparently for navigation using radio beacons. Ground-based VHF omnidirectional azimuth radio beacons (VOF) broadcast a reference signal in the 108–118 MHz range, while encoding azimuth bearing in a rotating variable signal. 1/ 6:58 AM · Jan 4, 2026 · 100.4K Views
❤1🤬1
https://x.com/fab_hinz/status/2007870188965036489 Fabian Hinz @fab_hinz And another mesh network-enabled air-to-air variant of the Geran-2. This time with a MANPAD. 9:12 PM · Jan 4, 2026 · 1,996 Views
❤1🤬1
https://luftlage.substack.com/p/networking-the-shahed
https://x.com/fab_hinz/status/2007855390340304928 Fabian Hinz @fab_hinz New article: Networking the Shahed How Russia’s datalink-enabled Geran-2s are evolving beyond the traditional one-way attack UAV concept. https://luftlage.substack.com/p/networking-the-shahed 8:13 PM · Jan 4, 2026 · 17.4K Views
❤3
https://x.com/KpsZSU/status/1990363572178747755 Ukrainian Air Force @KpsZSU ✈️ Mirage 2000 of the Ukrainian Air Force flies on a combat mission, awaiting good news from France. Ukraine🤝France 🇺🇦 Together to Victory! 1:47 PM · Nov 17, 2025 · 130K Views
👍9❤6🤡3😁1
https://x.com/KpsZSU/status/1976659040018247731 Ukrainian Air Force @KpsZSU 🇺🇦 Ukrainian F-16 pilot told @United24media how he shot down six Russian missiles in a single combat mission — a first in Ukraine’s air combat history. 💥 #UkrainianAirForce #F16 #UkrainianPilots #StandWithUkraine 6:10 PM · Oct 10, 2025 · 7,850 Views
❤11👏9🤡2😁1
https://x.com/BabakTaghvaee1/status/1973358893180002706 Babak Taghvaee - The Crisis Watch @BabakTaghvaee1 #Breaking: This Antonov An-124-100 of #AntonovAirlines, UR-82008, airlifted the second ex-#IDF Patriot PAC-2 air-defence system gifted by #Israel to #Ukraine. 3:36 PM · Oct 1, 2025 · 3,122 Views
👍6❤2😁2
https://x.com/KpsZSU/status/1972594589258441195 Ukrainian Air Force @KpsZSU F-16 UAF in action 🫡 12:59 PM · Sep 29, 2025 · 5,306 Views
❤7🤡5
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sSDa83syi0 Russia Fires Drones Into (NATO) Poland Good Times Bad Times: 350K subscribers 32,491 views Sep 10, 2025 #Ukraine #Russia #Poland
🤡5🤬4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAc_SaY62eo Russian Drone Swarm Enters Poland. Fighters Intercept At Least 14 Shaheds! F-16 & F-35 Scrambled. Suchomimus: 307K subscribers 86,879 views Sep 10, 2025 The Polish and US Air Force intercept a Russian drone swarm of at least 14 Shaheds that entered Polish Air Space. At least one building was damaged. This is the largest breach of NATO air space yet.
🤡4
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @DeadRussianSoldiers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“__Dead_Russian_Soldiers__” (@DeadRussianSoldiers), 3,050 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DeadRussianSoldiers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.