Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Dawn Lester & David Parker

@Dawn_David

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

706subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001281111804
TypeChannel
Username@Dawn_David
DescriptionJoin us in our chat group https://t.me/+bQgJc0RFxxNjOTRk
Created22 April 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/Dawn_David

Growth

7067 Aug 2026, 08:23 — 706 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:48 — 706 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:237 Aug 2026, 08:48
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 705–707 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 08:48706no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:23706first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
46
Videos
42
Links
181

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10263.4%
👍3421.1%
🔥148.70%
👏53.11%
🙏42.48%
10.621%
🤔10.621%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2025 to 21 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2025, 06:08 UTC963 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AdamBigelsen

🎤 MIC DROP🎤. We’re DONE with the “nano in the blood” nonsense. This is the last time we’ll talk about it — because we’ve brought the facts, the science, and decades of microscopy experience to the table. Watch it. Get clarity. Share it! Then let’s move on to REAL healing😁. (Featuring: Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Marizelle Arce, Dr. Ana Maria Oliva, Adam & Josh Bigelsen) https://youtu.be/DhDIXsponIQ?si=9vpe5f6wgPwRQ

19👏4🔥2🤔1

25 Jun 2025, 13:44 UTC≈1,140 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @alfavedic

On this episode of Conveersations, my friend Dawn Lester and I explore a ton of topics ranging from the importance of the written novel to the broad implications of our investigations into consciousness. Dawn is doing great work in this arena and is just a beautiful soul through and through. It was a great pleasure to have this free-flowing discussion with her! Towards the end we discuss her upcoming event in the UK

4🔥3👍2

24 Jun 2025, 12:43 UTCviews —

Dawn Lester & David Parker pinned «Today’s conversation is with my good friend Mark Gober. We discuss the common themes of his 7-book series that seeks to end our upside down view of various aspects of life. So what is consciousness? Why is it important to contemplate the nature of our thinking?…»

24 Jun 2025, 12:43 UTC≈1,680 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Today’s conversation is with my good friend Mark Gober. We discuss the common themes of his 7-book series that seeks to end our upside down view of various aspects of life. So what is consciousness? Why is it important to contemplate the nature of our thinking? What are the implications for our everyday lives? Join us for a fascinating discussion about how we can reverse the upside down view and turn everything the r

4👍4

20 Jun 2025, 15:58 UTC884 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

My third article on the topic of Assisted Dying, https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/assisted-dying-part-3

👍42🙏1

12 Jun 2025, 14:01 UTC790 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Discovering that so much of what we believed to be true is actually not true, whether partially or completely, raises the question: How can we know anything is true? Join Jordan and me on Episode 5 of my podcast as we discuss how we actually know what we think we know and tear apart the notion that we even need to ‘know’ everything. https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/dawn-of-discernment-ep-5-critical

10👍1

7 Jun 2025, 15:57 UTC≈1,190 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Here's the video version of my conversation with Dr Marizelle Arce, https://odysee.com/@Dawn-Lester:3/Marizelle---podcast-episode:a

10👍1

7 Jun 2025, 15:04 UTCviews —

Dawn Lester & David Parker pinned «Join Dr Marizelle Arce and me for a dive into the world of ‘germs’ to answer many questions about ‘germs’ and their real role in our bodies. In this conversation you’ll discover why she claims that, as in the title of her new book, Germs Are Not Our Enemy.…»

7 Jun 2025, 15:04 UTC986 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Join Dr Marizelle Arce and me for a dive into the world of ‘germs’ to answer many questions about ‘germs’ and their real role in our bodies. In this conversation you’ll discover why she claims that, as in the title of her new book, Germs Are Not Our Enemy. https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/dawn-of-discernment-ep-4-what-if

5🔥1

1 Jun 2025, 18:09 UTCviews —

Dawn Lester & David Parker pinned «Have you fallen for the 'divide and conquer' strategy? Find out in my latest podcast, https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/dawn-of-discernment-ep-3-divide-and»

1 Jun 2025, 18:09 UTC647 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Have you fallen for the 'divide and conquer' strategy? Find out in my latest podcast, https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/dawn-of-discernment-ep-3-divide-and

5👍5🙏1

20 May 2025, 11:21 UTCviews —

Dawn Lester & David Parker pinned «I've just launched my podcast. Here's the first episode. https://dawnlester.substack.com/p/dawn-of-discernment-ep-1-introduction»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Dawn_David. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dawn Lester & David Parker” (@Dawn_David), 706 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dawn_David.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.