Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Davlyri*закон мерфи

Channel

Davlyri*закон мерфи

@Davlyri

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

189subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004454310169
TypeChannel
Username@Davlyri
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 20 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded16 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Davlyri

Growth

18919119016 Aug 2026, 21:45 — 191 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 22:00 — 191 subscribers17 Aug 2026, 19:35 — 189 subscribers16 Aug 2026, 21:4517 Aug 2026, 19:35
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 189–191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:35189-2
16 Aug 2026, 22:00191no change
16 Aug 2026, 21:45191first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
220.7%
avg views ÷ 189 subscribers
Avg views / post
417
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held15 (20 July 202615 August 2026)
Views total6,256
Reactions total326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 15 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52562313181565118755918.1%
custom 53663306057662136744313.2%
custom 52787754253995597504012.3%
custom 52849764175771472513410.4%
custom 5273999357341900006319.51%
319.51%
🔥278.28%
💘154.60%
🍓113.37%
🤯103.07%
custom 528533461784963106772.15%
❤‍🔥61.84%
custom 536379193649688520351.53%
💋41.23%
💯20.613%
custom 536409536305144451810.307%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Davlyri. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC80 views23 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Приз за конкурс ням ням 🌟

14custom 52787754253995597505❤‍🔥3custom 52562313181565118751

6 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC345 views21 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

🥑🥑🥑🥑🥑🥑❗️❗️❗️ Сделала ролик на тему того как набирала аудиторию с нуля будучи художником в тг (нас кстати почти 200) Если тебе интересен мой путь советую глянуть 🌟🌟🌟 https://youtu.be/znqWOgFKN2s?si=j05B0K4_UwvaX9rF

🤯10🔥4custom 53663306057662136744custom 52739993573419000062custom 52849764175771472511

5 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC189 views21 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🪐👽™️🌰⛽️👽🪐🤩🤩 1. Место полноценный хэд @Kozyshka 2. Место цветной скетчевый хэд @sIhllo 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Всем спасибо кто присылал анекдоты, надеюсь вы тоже похихикали, на самом деле выбрать было трудно, но это больше идет как лотерея, так как юмор у всех разный, все смеются над разными шутками, это индивидуально 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Победителям напишу в течении суток 🌹

custom 536633060576621367411custom 52853346178496310674custom 52787754253995597502💋1custom 52562313181565118751custom 52739993573419000061custom 52849764175771472511

30 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC393 views41 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Всем привет кто пришел с рекламы или с пиар чата🤩 я вам очень Рада, наконец-то у меня есть какая то аудитория 😚😚😚😚😚😚😚😚😚😚😚 Буду рада если поучаствуйте в конкурсе на лучший анекдот 😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏😏 Я с любой хуйни смеюсь конечно, поэтому мне любой ваш анекдот нравится вхахах

🔥21custom 52739993573419000068custom 52849764175771472514💋3custom 53663306057662136742❤‍🔥1custom 52562313181565118751custom 52853346178496310671

30 Jul 2026, 01:45 UTC945 views38 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

АРТ ЗА ЛУЧШИЙ 🥑🧦🦄🐈📀🌰™️❗️❗️ конкурс~~~~🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 МЕСТА 1. Хэд цветной на простом фоне 2. Скетчевый цветной хэд 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 УСЛОВИЯ ~ Репост в канал или в три пиар чата ~ Подписка на меня @Davlyri ~ Прислать пруф репоста и сам анекдот в комментарии к этому посту ~ Максимально можно написать три анекдота ~ Я приветствую любой юмор, черный в том числе ❗️я не несу ответственность за то что вас может какая либо

custom 536633060576621367422custom 52849764175771472517custom 52739993573419000066custom 52787754253995597503

29 Jul 2026, 12:43 UTC456 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026

Почему кстати я опять рисую мужскую спину, я что фетишистка 🥺

🍓11

29 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC521 views34 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Что то непонятное, сначала погладили, потом уложили, какие то эмоциональные качели у меня 🌟🌟🌟

custom 525623131815651187520custom 52787754253995597506custom 52849764175771472515custom 52853346178496310671custom 53637919364968852031custom 53640953630514445181

27 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC427 views23 reactions1 Starread 16 August 2026

Кто на меня подписался, отзовитесь хоть в коментах 🤩 расскажите как дела или скиньте что рисуете (каналы можно прикреплять) Хочу узнать кто меня смотрит 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Ну пж….

custom 525623131815651187512custom 52849764175771472517custom 53663306057662136744

26 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTC447 views32 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Ладно, первоначальный вариант тоже выложу, просто он мне не особо нравится 😨

custom 5273999357341900006128custom 52562313181565118755custom 52849764175771472514💘2❤‍🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 03:35 UTC410 views21 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

Может быть потом закончу 🤩 Всем новеньким хэллооо 🤩🤩🤩🤩

custom 52787754253995597509custom 52562313181565118754custom 52849764175771472514💘21❤‍🔥1

20 Jul 2026, 21:47 UTC529 views26 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🤩🔅🔅🔅🔅🔅🤩 Ателье Колдовских Колпаков Кифлий 🖐

custom 525623131815651187510💘8custom 52787754253995597507custom 52739993573419000061

20 Jul 2026, 21:45 UTC501 views16 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🤩🔅🔅🔅🔅🔅🤩 Ателье колдовских Колпаков Олургио 🙈

custom 52787754253995597508custom 53637919364968852034custom 525623131815651187531

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @Davlyri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 946,924 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Davlyri*закон мерфи” (@Davlyri), 189 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Davlyri.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.