The corruption here is off the charts. Rand Paul has just released a trove of emails showing Fauci soliciting various so-called scientists to nominate him for awards, many of which Fauci then went on to win, receiving substantial prize money in the process. This needs to be forensically dissected, preferably by the DOJ. But even looking at just one example, Barton Haynes of Duke, the questions are staggering. Fauci …

Channel
DataRepublican (small r)
@DataRepublicanChannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
161subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002319487706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DataRepublicanChannel |
| Description | Crunching fedgov spending, election data, maps, code, more. Elon Musk - "Worth following". Charlie Kirk - "You're a must follow". |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DataRepublicanChannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 161 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 161 | first reading |
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 51.9%
- avg views ÷ 161 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 83.5
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.05%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 14 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (23 May 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 167 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 440
- Videos
- 26
- Links
- 355
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 45s
- Average length
- 45s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 8 | 29.6% | |
| 😡 | 8 | 29.6% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 🤪 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🧵🔥 THE MOVE: The Framework Candace Owens Uses to Train Her Audience to Ignore Evidence 🧵 Tyler Robinson left a handwritten confession note under his keyboard for his roommate. He sent a text first: "Drop what you are doing, look under my keyboard." The response from Candace's audience: "Where's the metadata on those texts?” The metadata exists. Search Warrant No. 3217131, Page 7: a warrant was obtained for Lance T…
🔥1
New Republic: “Have you ever considered you deserve to be assassinated?” There is no functioning country when half the population believes the other half deserves to die. https://t.me/RealSGAnonChannel
👏2❤1
Hello Mr. Kristof, I wouldn't be so quick about that. I'm still working on that article, and the story about how South Sudan ended up in the state it is now is much more complicated and tragic than it appears, and yes, USAID had an enormous role. https://t.me/DataRepublicanChannel
March 2018: RLS-NYC organized the first-ever delegation of European left party officials to the Congressional Progressive Caucus Strategy Summit in Baltimore. On the other side of those meetings: Elizabeth Warren (keynote), Nancy Pelosi, Ro Khanna, Barbara Lee, Pramila Jayapal. A German government-funded foundation brokered introductions between European socialist party officials and sitting US members of Congress.…
😡7
Yep, MEK are Marxist-Islamists. I don't know how else you'd describe their ideology. https://t.me/DataRepublicanChannel
🔥4❤1
Yup. The below was my low-level algorithmic fixes. Been around, invented enough algorithms, submitted enough papers, done that enough to know that I will be rejected at the peer review stage every time because of no PhD. https://t.me/DataRepublicanChannel
If you look up the article, there's the Reddit receipts. This was reported on CNN website. I get wanting to help out your own team. You're a left-wing populist. You want to see left-wing populists succeed. But this guy just isn't good for your side. https://t.me/DataRepublicanChannel
Joshi deleted Tweets, but I found them in Wayback machine. He called the leadership of the Department of Defense an "utter disgrace." He said JD Vance "doesn't have the slightest clue." https://t.me/DataRepublicanChannel
🤪1
Important story here. Progressive International also convenes a gathering of hostile foreign officials called The Hague Group. https://t.me/DataRepublicanChannel
🔥3
For those asking how John Roberts made that money: https://t.me/DataRepublicanChannel
😡1
No. In fact, they've moved away from End of History, on paper. Think of it as this way: the whole project has changed from "our democracy is strong and inevitable" to "our democracy is the best governance system just like capitalism is the best economic system, but it is fragile and must be cultivated." But there is still a lot of underlying assumptions. I wrote about it in a different paper: https://t.me/DataRepubl…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @DataRepublicanChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DataRepublican (small r)” (@DataRepublicanChannel), 161 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DataRepublicanChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.