https://vxtwitter.com/intern/status/2003158005563757031?s=20
❤1

Channel
@DastardlyAlpha
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
422subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001836280690 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DastardlyAlpha |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DastardlyAlpha |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 422 | -3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 425 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 426 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 429 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:59 | 432 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 434 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 434 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
70 reactions across 18 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 34.3% | |
| 🤣 | 9 | 12.9% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 10.0% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 8.57% | |
| 😁 | 6 | 8.57% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🙈 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 1.43% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2025 to 26 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://vxtwitter.com/intern/status/2003158005563757031?s=20
❤1
Merry Christmas Christmas to all that celebrate it. May our bags see better days in 2026. 😢
❤10
Might wanna grab SSD's now before they jump like RAM
💯2
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Samsung-to-halt-SATA-SSD-production-leaker-warns-of-up-to-18-months-of-SSD-price-pressure-worse-than-Micron-ending-consumer-RAM.1184896.0.html
HOW TO BYPASS TELEGRAM CENSORSHIP Apple iPhone 1. Using Safari browser 2. open & login to Telegram web app https://web.telegram.org/ 3. Tap share icon (1) 4. Select add to home screen (2) to create an easily accessible web app icon 5. Enjoy watching all your Appstore banned channels Android https://telegram.org/android 1. Download Telegram App directly from Telegram Website not the Google play store version 2. Inst…
❤3
Still bullish af on quil
❤6🤣2💊1
https://paragraph.com/@metaend/quilibrium-vs-darkfi-privacy-protocols-2025
hearing some people have gotten drained and it may be related to this apple exploit so make sure you update your shit
✍1
well damn that shit 2x already
🌭1
Another new pow only tradeable on safetrade, I think its 2m mcap rn. Dyor, maybe worth scooping some. https://superquantum.io/
🤔2
https://www.fuckedprotocol.xyz/ Got a "Protocol Graveyard" demo up — anyone can submit dead protocols.
🔥3
Probably worth farming this https://ostium.app/trade
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DastardlyAlpha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
@DastardlyAlpha named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DD Alpha” (@DastardlyAlpha), 422 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DastardlyAlpha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.