Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Darya Gurnovich

Channel

Darya Gurnovich

@DaryaGurnovich

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

141subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002287401608
TypeChannel
Username@DaryaGurnovich
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DaryaGurnovich

Growth

1411431429 August 2026 — 143 subscribers9 August 2026 — 143 subscribers25 August 2026 — 142 subscribers1 September 2026 — 141 subscribers9 August 20261 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 141–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 15:03141-1
25 Aug 2026, 05:24142-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:11143no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:46143first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 8 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7050.4%
🔥5237.4%
💯96.47%
😁75.04%
👍10.719%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2026 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 May 2026, 04:53 UTC156 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥14

16 Feb 2026, 11:05 UTC383 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

У меня есть суперспособность) Люди доверяют мне свои истории и в целом легко найти общий контакт. Вспомнила случай, как мы с подругой вышли с тренировки, она пошла за курткой, а когда пришла уже увидела картину, как рандомная девушка рассказывает мне где взяла ипотеку и под какой процент 😅 И таких ситуаций овер дофига ) Знак?

9

16 Feb 2026, 10:57 UTC357 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁5

16 Feb 2026, 10:57 UTC289 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Возвращаюсь из своего отшельничества этим кружком 🤍 Продала кровать, пока ее разбирали, пригласила женщину попить чай со мной. Ну и разговорились вот) Когда просила вселенную подать знак)

7

3 Feb 2026, 04:10 UTC323 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Смотрели выпуск «Осторожно, Собчак» про секту Кассиопея?) И смешно и грустно от этого. Что одиночество делает с людьми… Но, как говорится, как бы нам самим через год не начать путешествие по планетам и не чувствовать энергию Венеры 🕺

😁1

3 Feb 2026, 04:04 UTC277 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥1😁1

27 Jan 2026, 10:27 UTC335 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Блин, так же мама позвонила мне сейчас и рассказала про какой-то новый вирус и что никуда нам лететь не надо, потому что все умрут от вируса и всё тлен 🌚 🤡

4👍1

27 Jan 2026, 10:24 UTC288 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Увидела новость, что ТГ заблокируют к сентябрю, репостнула сюда. А потом думаю «ну и че?». Че подпитывать негативные эмоции. Удалила. Выход что ли не найдем? Как с Инстой все. Если надо нам, решение будет. Вообще ограждаю себя от всяких нехороших новостей, давно не смотрю новости, ниче не читаю такого. Даже не знаю что в мире происходит. В моем мире вот происхожу я, и это куда важнее для моего внутреннего состояни

💯9

26 Jan 2026, 11:05 UTC247 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня снимали в PUDRA нашу постоянную клиентку Оксану, вроде обычный рабочий вайб, обычная съемка. В какой-то момент мы с SMM Аней поймали себя на том, что это уже почти полноценная коуч-сессия. И, как люди творческие, чуть не расплакались от её слов. Говорили про искренность. Про любовь не точечно, а в большом, общем масштабе. Про выбор быть настоящими. Так ценно встречать на своём пути людей с похожим видением.

4

23 Jan 2026, 11:58 UTC233 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

В 9 классе родители решили перевести меня в другую школу. Там была сильнее подготовка, никто не ставил липовых оценок. Мне было 16 лет. В старой школе у меня были друзья, всё было знакомо и понятно. Конечно, я сопротивлялась и капризничала, что никуда не пойду. Но в глубине души я этого хотела. Я хотела нового. Я знала, что там мне будет лучше, что я смогу начать с чистого листа. Я видела в этом потенциал и именно п

15

12 Jan 2026, 06:34 UTC284 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Я не шутила, что сегодня я Страшила

4

12 Jan 2026, 06:27 UTC252 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, ну с первым рабочим днем в этом году!!! 💫 У меня уже была планерка рабочая, чувствовала себя Страшилой из Изумрудного города, который ищет мозги. Я не помню как работать!!! Че у вас там как ?

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @DaryaGurnovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 633,993 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Darya Gurnovich” (@DaryaGurnovich), 141 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DaryaGurnovich.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.