Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Dark Horse Investor Group

Channel

Dark Horse Investor Group

@Darkhorseinvestorgroup

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

368subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001224863664
TypeChannel
Username@Darkhorseinvestorgroup
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Darkhorseinvestorgroup

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

368371369.57 August 2026 — 371 subscribers8 August 2026 — 371 subscribers15 August 2026 — 368 subscribers22 August 2026 — 369 subscribers28 August 2026 — 368 subscribers7 August 202628 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 21 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 368–371 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 19:03368-1
22 Aug 2026, 18:47369+1
15 Aug 2026, 06:55368-3
8 Aug 2026, 06:19371no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:00371first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 56s
Average length
59s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1263.2%
❤315.8%
👍315.8%
👏15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC34 views0 reactionsread 8 August 2026

I’m currently studying a cycle-based mathematical formula on Bitcoin that identifies specific days of the month where bullish pressure tends to increase. This month is the first live test of the system. Tomorrow I’m watching Bitcoin closely at key technical levels. If the structure sets up the way the math suggests, I’m looking for an entry. The idea is that Saturday carries the higher probability of follow-through …

5 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC40 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

After monitoring Pump.fun’s price action, I’ve noticed a recurring pattern. July 2025: +311% rally, followed by an 84% correction. October 2025: +270% rally, followed by a 70% correction. December 2025: +100% rally, followed by a 65% correction. July 2026: +117% rally. Now we’re watching to see if another meaningful correction develops. As a contrarian, I’m not chasing strength. If this historical pattern repeats, …

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

As we move through Q3, the crypto market is approaching a period that has historically produced increased volatility ahead of the U.S. midterm election cycle entering Q4. We expect macroeconomic developments, policy decisions, liquidity shifts, and market sentiment to play a significant role in driving the next wave of price movement. Because of this, our research and analysis will place a stronger emphasis on crypto…

❤1👏1

4 Aug 2026, 21:23 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Over $1 BILLION in revenue. Not from creating meme coins. From selling the infrastructure that lets everyone else create them. That’s why we investigated Pump.fun. The biggest opportunities often aren’t the products. They’re the businesses selling the picks and shovels. Is Pump.fun building a long term business, or is this just peak meme coin mania?

👍1

1 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC56 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Based on my last five year research of Bitcoin, August has historically been a weak month. Only one of the last five Augusts closed positive, and that was August 2021. Every August from 2022 through 2025 finished negative. That gives us an 80% historical probability that August is a down month for Bitcoin. This doesn’t mean Bitcoin has to decline this August. Analysis and forecasting are probability games, not cer…

🔥3👍1

31 Jul 2026, 12:17 UTC66 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Exxon Mobile’s Historical Pattern played out! I detected this pattern 3 years ago. July was strong.

🔥3❤2

30 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC72 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Q3 2026…1st Full Moon Outcome Status: Success Asset: Bitcoin Lunar Event: Full Moon (July 29, 2026) Outcome: Local low formed within the event window, followed by a sustained bullish expansion into resistance. Classification: Bullish reversal at Full Moon. Research Note: Add to the historical database and update the running win rate for Full Moon events.

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Darkhorseinvestorgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Dark Horse Investor Group” (@Darkhorseinvestorgroup), 368 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Darkhorseinvestorgroup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.