Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 吃瓜群众【 猎奇ღ内涵】

Channel

吃瓜群众【 猎奇ღ内涵】

@Dap110888

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,223subscribers

-9,354 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002517548974
TypeChannel
Username@Dap110888
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Dap110888

Growth

2,22311,5776,9007 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,576 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,124 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,115 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,262 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,075 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,096 subscribers21 August 2026 — 3,228 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,260 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,223 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 20 days, net -9,354. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 820–12,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 23:562,223-37
24 Aug 2026, 19:342,260-968
21 Aug 2026, 04:283,228-1,868
17 Aug 2026, 19:045,096-3,979
14 Aug 2026, 13:149,075-187
10 Aug 2026, 19:179,262-853
9 Aug 2026, 20:1210,115-9
8 Aug 2026, 23:0210,124-1,452
8 Aug 2026, 02:0311,576-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:0111,577first reading

Engagement

64 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.0%
avg views ÷ 2,223 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
64
of 64 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held64 (6 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total103,871
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30m 16s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 43 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC2 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

: 江苏一女子为心灵疗愈服务狂花20万,丈夫:整个人都没法沟通了,上课的时候让你哭让你叫,调动你的情绪,不停地进行洗脑。 这让我想起来了一个电影:周处除三害

15 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC2 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

: 8月13日,贵阳北站,安检员扣押没收了一把左轮玩具手枪,并登记了小孩哥的身份信息。随后小孩哥哭了起来。 评论区热议: “风声鹤唳、草木皆兵” “杯弓蛇影、惊弓之鸟” “这是好事小孩大概率不会成为基本盘” “怕啥,玩具都怕” “草木皆兵全民超神”

15 Aug 2026, 04:51 UTC2 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

: 8月15日,江苏多地出现大暴雨引发内涝。一女子被湍急的雨洪困住,绝望地大喊:“政府呢,政府的人在哪里啊?抗洪的人呐?” 有流出的现场视频显示,湖州织里镇发洪水期间,有两人被电伤亡。

14 Aug 2026, 23:25 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

: 8月14日,网友曝光: 湖北武汉洪山区街道口至亚贸广场附近的天桥上躺着一名残疾人,双手被截肢,还疑似骨头外露、腿部残疾,脸上沾满污垢,身边挂着二维收款码。 评论区网友认为这是“采生折割”(指把健康人折磨成残疾以乞讨)或被“有组织控制”。

14 Aug 2026, 22:58 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

: 成都警方搜查基督教徒聚会现场 8月13日晚,四川成都武侯区,适逢音乐教师华老师60岁大寿,其多名学生前往老师家中聚餐庆祝寿。在预备晚餐期间,约六点钟左右,红牌楼派出所民警邱某及其他工作人员到现场敲门,出示传唤证和搜查令,对私家住所进行搜查,并逐一登记在场人员身份信息。 在警方执法过程中,有警察与现场人员发生言语争执。其中邱姓警员(山东口音),嗓门很大,要求公民面对警察上门不要额外的“逼逼”,配合检查,不得顶嘴。 随后,教会长老晏某和信徒华某东被警方押送到红牌楼派出所接受调查。

14 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC5 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

:网友投稿:8月12日,上海新世界城发生一起持刀伤人事件。现场一人持刀与另一人扭打,有人报警后,警察到场将涉事人员带走,地上散落大量血迹。

14 Aug 2026, 22:02 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

: 近日,一名中国女子在巴厘岛晒出自己的旅行经历:途中与两名意大利男子互动亲密,还分别收获了亲吻。 视频一出,评论区瞬间热闹起来,不少女网友直呼“羡慕了”,还有人调侃:这趟巴厘岛,风景看没看够不知道,桃花是真没少遇。

14 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

: 西安公安抖音发布未央区盛龙广场抓获电诈人员,评论区全是给指路的。 根据网友提供的情况,电信诈骗组织遍及西安东南西北各大商务办公大楼,甚至居民区,传销组织遍布各个城中村也已是多年顽疾。这些电诈、传销组织已存在多年。 有网友反映,2018年西安扫黑严打时候,这些电诈、传销组织依旧正常营业。有人认为,政府只是定期运动式宣传而已。

14 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026

✦ | 次元互推b车12号车 | ------------------------ ------------------------

14 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

比尔·盖茨女儿参与创办的电商工具 Phia,最近卷入一场“佣金劫持”争议。 有质疑称,Phia 可能会在用户结账时自动植入推广渠道码,即便消费者并非通过它完成购物,也可能被计入其推广来源,从而获得商家佣金。 由于类似做法过去曾引发严重法律后果,不少网友开始讨论 Phia 是否会面临监管甚至诉讼风险。 不过目前相关指控仍需进一步证实,把事件直接定性为“诈骗”或“要坐牢”,还为时过早。

14 Aug 2026, 12:30 UTC4 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

美女博主吐槽英国地铁座椅太脏,没想到视频发到IG后,竟被黄秋生留言嘲讽,还让她“先学好英文”。 结果博主直接用一口流利英语反击,现场上演大型“反向教学”。 事件发酵后,相关评论被删除,评论区也随即关闭。

12 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026

✦ | 次元互推b车12号车 | ------------------------ ------------------------

Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @Dap110888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,313,070 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“吃瓜群众【 猎奇ღ内涵】” (@Dap110888), 2,223 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dap110888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.