Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Danger closed

@DangerFmly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

268subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003747035206
TypeChannel
Username@DangerFmly
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held1
On Telegramt.me/DangerFmly

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 12:16268first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
34
Videos
8
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
12s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 2 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5361917299236284515428.6%
custom 5424713114127988197428.6%
custom 5361775410696693961214.3%
custom 521109137508428536017.14%
custom 530528687983324338417.14%
custom 542464812268286468617.14%
custom 542508962384605693217.14%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 5 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 09:04 UTC495 viewsread 14 August 2026

Наши любимые девочки 🥺 Тоже будем скучать, мы пиздец благодарны вам за такой опыт, что проходили этот путь с нами 🙏 Это наша первая семья и вы не представляете какой вклад вы внесли, какие эмоции вы нам доставили, пиздец заобнимали бы каждого

6 May 2026, 08:37 UTC478 viewsread 14 August 2026

Danger уходит в рест на неопределенный срок Спасибо всем, кто был с нами это время, всех любим и ценим, надеюсь, вернемся к вам с новыми силами ❤️ Союзы можете разорвать, можете дождаться, все поймем

1 May 2026, 22:50 UTC464 viewsread 14 August 2026

🌟Danger уходят на выходные, все важное в бот Всем желаем хорошенько отдохнуть

1 May 2026, 16:00 UTC968 views12 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤎 Перенабор в Danger объявляется открытым Перед заявкой в основной чат обязательно ознакомьтесь с правилами От вас требуется: 🌟подписка на канал семьи 🌟подача заявки Заявки будут приняты предположительно 10 мая Прем эмоджи с инициалами: 🤩

custom 54247131141279881974custom 53617754106966939612custom 53619172992362845152custom 52110913750842853601custom 53052868798332433841custom 54246481226828646861custom 54250896238460569321

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @DangerFmly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,465,554 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Danger closed” (@DangerFmly), 268 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DangerFmly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.