2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 361–363 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Aug 2026, 21:03
362
no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:29
362
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 9 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,390
Videos
≈197
Links
≈371
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
220 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
147
66.8%
❤
45
20.5%
👍
12
5.45%
👏
6
2.73%
👎
4
1.82%
🤩
2
0.909%
🤯
2
0.909%
🤔
1
0.455%
🥰
1
0.455%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 220reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2023 to 28 July 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📣 ثبتنام زودهنگام آغاز شد 📣
رقابت، هیجان، خلاقیت، کارِتیمی، خلاقیت و نوآوری😍
اینبار با استفاده از بازیهای فکری❗❕
در
🧩🎲 رویداد کارآفرینی دانشآموزی «کارِتون» 🎲🧩
🗓 در ۵ روز، از ۲۰ تا ۲۴ مرداد ماه ۱۴۰۳
👤 ویژۀ دانشآموزان پایهی هفتم تا یازدهم تمامی مدارس استان یزد
🔥۴۰٪ تخفیف ثبتنام زودهنگام تنها به مدت ۵ روز از ۴ تا ۸ مرداد ماه🔥
💳 هزینهٔ ثبتنام زودهنگام :
۴۰۰,۰۰۰ تومان❌️
۲۴۰,۰۰۰ تومان✅️
🌐 ثبتنام از طریق :
www…
سلام و درود خدمت تمامی شما داناکیهای عزیز 😁👋
امیدواریم فصل دوم داناکست براتون مفید بوده باشه و ازش لذت برده باشین 🌷
لطفاً در نظرسنجی زیر شرکت کنین و بهمون بگید که به کدوم اپیزود بیشتر علاقد داشتید؟🤔
و اگر انتقاد، پیشنهاد و یا ایدهای برای بهبود کیفیت داناکست دارین، حتماً به پشتیبانی داناک سر بزنین 🤝
همچنین، منتظر فصل سوم باشین... 😎
➖➖➖➖➖➖
@Danak_Org | 🎙
🎙اپیزود هشت #داناکست
🔸️تاداشی یانای
🔰 «شاید به نظر بسیاری من آدم موفقی باشم اما اشتباهات بسیاری داشته ام! مردم اشتباهاتشان را خیلی جدی میگیرند! مسأله این است که شما باید مثبت فکر کرده و باور داشته باشید که دفعه بعد موفقیت ازآن شما خواهد بود.»
این ها بخشی از سخنان یکی از موفق ترین کارآفرینان ژاپنی است که در میان غوغای شرکت های بزرگ درهٔ سیلیکون به موفقیت و شهرت زیادی دست پیدا کنه؛
در ادامه با ما همراه باشید تا با ای…
🎙اپیزود هفت #داناکست
🔸️استیو جابز
🔰 شما هم هر سال موقع رونمایی از سری جدید از موبایل های آیفون پیگیر اخبار و مشتاق خرید اون هستید؟
اگه میخواید بدونید فلسفهٔ تولید این گوشی های موبایل و دیگر محصولات مختلف شرکت اپل از کجا شکل گرفته
با ما همراه باشید تا با کارآفرین بنیان گذار این شرکت آشنا بشید😎
نویسنده: شادی فلاح
گوینده: احمدرضا غلامی
تدوینگر: ابوالفضل شریفی
🔸 راستی! میتونین داناکست رو در اینستاگرام danak_biology و…
🎙اپیزود شش #داناکست
🔸️مارک زاکربرگ
🔰 تو این اپیزود قصد داریم شما رو با کارآفرینی آشنا کنیم که دنیای شبکه های اجتماعی رو داخل خوابگاه دانشگاه هاروارد متحول کرد😁
با ما همراه باشید 😎
نویسنده: ابوالفضل شریفی
گوینده: ابوالفضل شریفی
تدوینگر: ابوالفضل شریفی
🔸 راستی! میتونین داناکست رو در اینستاگرام danak_biology و کستباکس هم دنبال کنین:
https://castbox.fm/va/5375632
➖➖➖➖➖➖
@Danak_Org | 🎙
🎙اپیزود پنج #داناکست
🔸️لارنس پیج
🔰 تا حالا شده بخواید جواب یه سؤال مهم رو جستجو کنید و بین منابع مختلف سرگردون بشید؟
در این قسمت قصد داریم به معرفی یکی از کارآفرینان مطرحی بپردازیم که با معرفی موتور جستجوگر گوگل این امر رو برای جهانیان بسیار ساده کرده
با ما همراه باشید 😎
نویسنده: مهدیه طیب زاده
گوینده: شادی فلاح
تدوینگر: ابوالفضل شریفی
🔸 راستی! میتونین داناکست رو در اینستاگرام danak_biology و کستباکس هم دنبال کن…
🎙اپیزود چهار #داناکست
🔸️دیجیکالا
🔰 میریم سراغ چهارمین قسمت از فصل دوم داناکست که میخواییم در این پادکست درباره ی یکی از موفق ترین کارآفرینان ایران در دو دهه اخیر بوده صحبت کنیم
با ما همراه باشید 😎
نویسنده: پارسا کرمینیا
گوینده: سامان قانع
تدوینگر: ابوالفضل شریفی
🔸 راستی! میتونین داناکست رو در اینستاگرام danak_biology و کستباکس هم دنبال کنین:
https://castbox.fm/va/5375632
➖➖➖➖➖➖
@Danak_Org | 🎙
🎙اپیزود سه #داناکست
🔸️جف بزوس
🔰 تا حالا شده برای خرید از فروشگاه های آنلاین استفاده کنین؟ بدون شک بزرگترین این فروشگاه ها آمازونه. اگه میخواید با این فروشگاه و پدید آورندهاش بیشتر آشنا بشید تا آخر این اپیزود همراهمون باشید 😎
نویسنده: محمدمصطفی شکیبا
گوینده: احمدرضا غلامی
تدوینگر: امید دستجردی
🔸 راستی! میتونین داناکست رو در اینستاگرام danak_biology و کستباکس هم دنبال کنین:
https://castbox.fm/va/5375632
➖➖➖➖➖➖
@…
🎙اپیزود دو #داناکست
🔸️ایلان ماسک
🔰 میریم سراغ دومین قسمت از فصل دوم داناکست که میخواییم درباره ی زندگی ایلان ماسک، یکی از کارآفرینان موفق صحبت کنیم
با ما همراه باشید 😎
نویسنده: امیرمحمد میمنت آبادی
گوینده: محمد مصطفی شکیبا
تدوینگر: ابوالفضل شریفی
🔸 راستی! میتونین داناکست رو در اینستاگرام danak_biology و کستباکس هم دنبال کنین:
https://castbox.fm/va/5375632
➖➖➖➖➖➖
@Danak_Org | 🎙
🎙اپیزود یک فصل دوم #داناکست
🔸️بیلگیتس
🔰توی اولین قسمت از فصل دوم داناکست قراره درباره ی زندگی بیل گیتس، یکی از ثأثیرگذار ترین کارآفرینان جهان صحبت کنیم
شخصی که با اقداماتش جهان فناوری رو تحت تأثیر زیادی قرار داد…
با ما همراه باشید 😎
نویسنده: امید دستجردی
گوینده: شادی فلاح
تدوینگر: امید دستجردی
🔸 راستی! میتونین داناکست رو در اینستاگرام danak_biology و کستباکس هم دنبال کنین:
https://castbox.fm/va/5375632
➖➖➖➖➖➖
…
🔥13👍3❤2👎2
Signed Shahrzad jeihoon
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Danak_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کدوم اپیزود از سری دوم داناکست رو بیشتر دوست داشتین؟
بیل گیتس25%
ایلان ماسک25%
جف بزوس4%
حمید و سعید محمدی15%
لارنس پیج1%
زاکربرگ6%
استیو جابز7%
تاداشی یانای15%
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2023 to 28 July 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 594,996 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Danak_org named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bioup_event named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“داناک” (@Danak_org), 362 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Danak_org.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.