Channel
@DailyIlm1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
932subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002071188183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DailyIlm1 |
| Description | Our Ahadith channel: @DailyAhadith1 Our Tafsir channel: @DailyTafseer1 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DailyIlm1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 932 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 932 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
44 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 68.2% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 13.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 6.82% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 2.27% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 2.27% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Reviving Shem, the son of Noah – one of the great miracles of Jesus (peace be upon him) In historical narrations and books of tafsīr such as those of Ibn Kathīr and al-Thaʿlabī, it is mentioned that when Jesus (peace be upon him) spread the message of monotheism among the Children of Israel, his enemies continued to raise doubts. They said: “You only revive those who have recently died; perhaps they were merely unc…
❤6👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Imām al-Bukhārī narrates: Abu Jaʿfar narrated: I heard al-Ḥasan ibn Mūsā al-Ashyab mention the Jahmiyyah, and he spoke harshly against them. Then he said: “A head figure among the zanādiqah (heretics), called Shamghalah, was brought before al-Mahdī. Al-Mahdī said to him: ‘Point me to your companions.’ He replied: ‘My companions are more than that.’ He said: ‘Then point them out to me.’ So he said: *‘They are t…
❤1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Imām al-Ājurrī says: It is said to the Qadarī: O one that satan has played with, O one who denies that Allāh has created the evil, Isn’t Iblīs the foundation of every evil? Hasn’t Allāh created him? Hasn’t Allāh created the demons and Sent them upon those whom He wants so they misguide him from the path of guidance? So what evidence you have O Qadarī? Then Imām mentions these verses: وَمَن يَعْشُ عَن ذِكْرِ …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Imām al-Ājurrī says: And whoever says “Īmān is speech without actions”, It is said to him: You have rejected the Qur’ān, and the Sunnah, and what that the scholars have consensus upon, And you have exited from the statement of the Muslims, And you have committed Kufr to The Great Allāh. 📚 ash-Sharī’ah of al-Ājurrī 1/372 📝 this is a clear cut Takfīr of the Murji’ah, including people like Abū Hanīfah. Even tho …
👎5❤3
Sticker, posted without a caption
There is no difference between the Jahmiyyah and the Ashʿarīs; except that the Jahmiyyah are explicit males who openly state their doctrine, while the Ashʿarīs are effeminate, disguising and obscuring matters for the common people and the ignorant. — ʿAbdullāh ibn Imām Aḥmad said: “I asked my father about one who says that when Allah spoke to Mūsā, He did not speak with a voice — (the statement of the Ashʿarīs). …
❤2💯2👍1
Sticker, posted without a caption
Texts that the compromisers do not show you: Ibn Taymiyyah said: “Al-Ashʿarī, in that matter, followed the Jahmiyyah and the Muʿtazilah who denied that actions subsist in Him, exalted is He; except that those (Muʿtazilah and Jahmiyyah) also deny the attributes, unlike the Ashʿarīs.” 📚 Minhāj al-Sunnah (2/390) He also said: “It has thus become clear that these people — meaning the later Ashʿarīs — in reality and …
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DailyIlm1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily ‘Ilm” (@DailyIlm1), 932 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DailyIlm1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.