Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Daffy Duck Review's

@DaffyDuckReviews

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

696subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001961947782
TypeChannel
Username@DaffyDuckReviews
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DaffyDuckReviews

Growth

6966986977 August 2026 — 698 subscribers8 August 2026 — 698 subscribers14 August 2026 — 696 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 696–698 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 13:15696-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:19698no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:26698first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

11 May 2026, 07:32 UTCviews —

Daffy Duck Review's pinned «Hi! Everyone been a months now and I'm ready to share another banger project soon keep an eye 👀 in this channel Good Morning ☕»

11 May 2026, 07:32 UTC431 viewsread 8 August 2026

Hi! Everyone been a months now and I'm ready to share another banger project soon keep an eye 👀 in this channel Good Morning ☕

11 Mar 2026, 10:20 UTC494 viewsread 8 August 2026

Gamble on $JEW 850k MCAP or wait for the dip this one looks good always dyor https://dexscreener.com/solana/G6drkuEpqo44h7we4dAR4m5B48n17F1pMaxSejU7pUTz

7 Mar 2026, 16:43 UTC411 viewsread 8 August 2026

CryptoBitlord is biong about $AUTISM seems this one is gonna be a mooner 😁

3 Mar 2026, 15:18 UTC377 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @KOLscopeVideo

🟪 MULTIPLIER DETECTED: 3x+ @DaffyDuckReviews made 3x+ on AUTISM. $1.11M ⮕ $3.35M 🔎 Call❕💍 KOL 🆖 Advertise across the KOLscope Ecosystem🔥

28 Feb 2026, 19:01 UTCviews —

Daffy Duck Review's pinned «I ape some small bag here in $AUTISM seems to be contagious, spreading EVERYWHERE. Even the whales are autistic :) at 1.1mcap right now or wait for more dip always watch your entry Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/8jiVXftnn2ZG6bugK7HAH5j2G3D6TpsG521gqsWwpump»

28 Feb 2026, 19:01 UTC344 viewsread 8 August 2026

I ape some small bag here in $AUTISM seems to be contagious, spreading EVERYWHERE. Even the whales are autistic :) at 1.1mcap right now or wait for more dip always watch your entry Chart: https://dexscreener.com/solana/8jiVXftnn2ZG6bugK7HAH5j2G3D6TpsG521gqsWwpump

25 Feb 2026, 09:04 UTC299 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @KOLscopeVideo

🟪 MULTIPLIER DETECTED: 10x+ @DaffyDuckReviews made 10x+ on GROKIUS. $338K ⮕ $3.52M 🔎 Call❕💍 KOL 🆖 Advertise across the KOLscope Ecosystem🔥

24 Feb 2026, 02:40 UTC339 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @KOLscopeVideo

🟪 MULTIPLIER DETECTED: 6x+ @DaffyDuckReviews made 6x+ on GROKIUS. $338K ⮕ $2.04M 🔎 Call❕💍 KOL 🆖 Advertise across the KOLscope Ecosystem🔥

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DaffyDuckReviews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 837,662 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Daffy Duck Review's” (@DaffyDuckReviews), 696 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DaffyDuckReviews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.