Channel
@D_osamu_LB
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003634104706 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @D_osamu_LB |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/D_osamu_LB |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 11:46 | 52 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 50 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 50 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 448 |
| Reactions total | 79 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
180 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 94 | 52.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 13.3% | |
| 🍾 | 16 | 8.89% | |
| 🍓 | 11 | 6.11% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 5.56% | |
| 👀 | 5 | 2.78% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 2.78% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 2.22% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 2.22% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 1.67% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 1.11% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.556% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.556% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
══════════⊹° ࿔𑁯ᰍ࿔°⊹═══════════ Насколько странно устроена человеческая память. Мозг так легко может вычеркнуть полезную информацию, например, где лежат отчёты, которые меня умоляли дописать (прости, Куникида, но они в зоне абсолютного небытия~). Но при этом в память намертво въедается абсолютно бесполезные мелочи. Можно подумать, человек волен управлять своими мыслями... Но стоит подуть холодному ветру, и сразу всп…
❤🔥6❤2
══════════⊹° ࿔𑁯ᰍ࿔°⊹═══════════ Кстати, сегодня же идеальный момент, чтобы наконец-то перестать откладывать прекрасное на потом! Вечером под светом луны вода невероятно живописна...~ Хотя, если подумать, медленное кружение среди холодных волн и бесконечной серости дней подошла бы для какого-нибудь мрачного поэта, воспевающего бренность человеческого существования. Или писателя...?... Какая же чушь. Этот вид кажется…
❤6🕊2
══════════⊹° ࿔𑁯ᰍ࿔°⊹═══════════ Дазай почему не совершил суицид на раз два а тянешь?. Красивый уход - это искусство, а настоящее искусство не терпит суеты. Так ещё для моего идеального суицида есть капризные условия... Например, умереть в компании прекрасной дамы.)) #анон ══════════ (( _ _ ))..zZ ═══════════
❤6🍾1💘1
══════════⊹° ࿔𑁯ᰍ࿔°⊹═══════════ Сегодня у вас настроение на крайне детальный допрос! Но у меня как раз освободилась минутка для ваших вопросов.~ Какие яды вы пробовали для самоубийства? Можно списком? И почему, как вы думаете, не сработало? Аа, на эту тему можно написать целую диссертацию!!^^ Я пробовал мыльные средства и обычные рецепты яды из подручных средств, но моим любимым является отвар из ядовитых грибов! К…
❤6🍾1💘1
══════════⊹° ࿔𑁯ᰍ࿔°⊹═══════════ Ах, люблю, когда кто-то проявляет интерес к моей скромной персоне.~ Стоит прервать свои размышления о прекрасном и ответить вам. В какую историческую эпоху ты хотел бы жить? В далёком будущем! Представьте только: технологии шагнут так далеко вперёд, что учёные наконец-то изобретут абсолютный, гарантированный и совершенно безболезненный способ уйти из жизни одним нажатием кнопки. Ника…
❤7🍓3🕊2
Это ужасная ирония и трагедия... Упасть в куст крапивы... Я ищу безболезненный и красивый способ уйти из этого мира, а вселенная решила наказать меня самой жгучей и мерзкой травой на планете! Я категорически не переношу боль. И теперь искренне не смогу переносить растительность. Лицо жжет просто невыносимо. Может, снова полностью забинтовать его, как в старые и добрые времена в Мафии?.. Даже не знаю, что хуже: милы…
❤8😭4😈1
══════════⊹° ࿔𑁯ᰍ࿔°⊹═══════════ Правда, экрану и камере немного плохо, но кого из нас можно назвать полностью целостным?) Стоило возвращаться из прохладных вод ради двухчасовой лекции от Куникиды о том, как я сломал весь его идеальный график? Хотя я считаю это своим достижением. А ещё я нашел симпатичную корягу! Ее можно нужно повесить в офисе...! (~￣³￣)~ ══════════ (( _ _ ))..zZ ═══════════
❤9🍾2
Ох, смотрите-ка, телефон все ещё работает...
👀5😱3❤1
Channel name was changed to «𝚍𝚊𝚣𝚊𝚒 𝚘𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚞 ☕»
⬜:: ❄️ :: 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓉 𝒾𝓈 𝑜𝓋𝑒𝓇, 𝓌𝑒𝓁𝒸𝑜𝓂𝑒 𝒷𝒶𝒸𝓀 𝓉𝑜 𝒹𝓊𝓉𝓎. 『 🌟 』Наш дорогой Дазай Осаму хорошо отдохнул и вновь доступен для взаимодействия! Он очень скучает и с нетерпением ожидает ваших вопросов. ⇉🤩 ⇇ #рест #Дазай_Осаму
❤1❤🔥1
Channel name was changed to «Рест | 𝚍𝚊𝚣𝚊𝚒 𝚘𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚞 ☕ 404:...ᴱ ᴿ ᴿ ᴼ ᴿ»
⬜:: ❄️ :: 𝒽𝒶𝓋𝑒 𝒶 𝑔𝑜𝑜𝒹 𝓇𝑒𝓈𝓉! 『 🦦 』Наш дорогой Дазай Осаму немного устал, в связи с чем берёт краткосрочный перерыв от работы! Мы предоставляем его одиночеству и просим не тревожить саппорта до 22 июля. ⇉🌺⇇ #рест #Дазай_Осаму
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @D_osamu_LB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 327,432 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝚍𝚊𝚣𝚊𝚒 𝚘𝚜𝚊𝚖𝚞 ☕” (@D_osamu_LB), 52 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/D_osamu_LB.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.