Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π—§π—›π—˜ 𝗖π—₯π—œπ—•

Channel

π—§π—›π—˜ 𝗖π—₯π—œπ—•

@D_CRIB

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

9,716subscribers

-263 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002302917849
TypeChannel
Username@D_CRIB
DescriptionALPHA + Degen memecoin posts (SOL, Base, BSC, ETH & more). Risky. NFA. Fam (make sure to check @): - Contact/manage β€’ π—•π˜‚π˜€π—Άπ—»π—²π˜€π˜€ : @Crypto_litty @Chad_Messiah @eric_5507 🧡Other TGs: @MessiahsCrib PlayGround: t.me/+JylN_rayWIsyMjU0
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/D_CRIB

Growth

9,7169,9799,847.57 August 2026 β€” 9,979 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 9,979 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 9,959 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 9,772 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 9,716 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,677–10,018 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:489,716-56
10 Aug 2026, 17:539,772-187
8 Aug 2026, 02:519,959-20
7 Aug 2026, 15:159,979no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:039,979first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
32.7%
avg views Γ· 9,716 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,180
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.01%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (12 June 2026 – 29 July 2026)
Views total22,270
Reactions total894
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
414
Videos
2
Links
313

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,088 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘28113.5%
πŸŽ‰27513.2%
❀26412.6%
πŸ¦„25412.2%
🀩25312.1%
πŸ”₯24811.9%
😁1969.39%
❀‍πŸ”₯874.17%
πŸ₯°833.98%
πŸ’―773.69%
😍703.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 2,088reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTCβ‰ˆ3,050 views229 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺ™ $OnlyMarms This looks kinda funny narra tbh, so aped some. https://x.com/Rainmaker1973/status/2082101341137056215 https://dexscreener.com/solana/6bv1jm1debpeeeovhorajftbmvdkqidc9mxyrqwfgoxz

πŸ¦„76❀30πŸ”₯29πŸ‘27πŸŽ‰25🀩22😁20

20 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTCβ‰ˆ4,080 views124 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺΆ $BOWYER Aped this one, i tested the bot it works pretty gucci. Lately, Virtual launches are horrendous but it's kinda low so took my chances. https://github.com/BowyerApp/bowyer 0xaF4C10fEf50059d1e3E8aB1C80E46DB6A76098B4

🀩25😁24πŸŽ‰20❀19πŸ‘19πŸ”₯17

18 Jul 2026, 05:55 UTCβ‰ˆ3,090 views134 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺΆ $APPLCAT Just woke up and aped this. Meme + RWA is a narrative I like, and seeing Vlad mention it gave me another reason to take a look. Not an early entry like the usual CRIB gems, it's already had a decent move. Don't chase green candles. DYOR. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x4bed05783e5a478cdcf84517f0a19645b26b32d3

πŸ¦„30πŸŽ‰27πŸ‘20❀18🀩16πŸ”₯12😁11

18 Jul 2026, 05:45 UTCβ‰ˆ2,940 views52 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

πŸ‘11🀩10πŸŽ‰9❀8😁8πŸ”₯6

17 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTCβ‰ˆ3,770 views123 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸ”΅ $TSG APed some, Cobie tweet so hence its pumping. https://dexscreener.com/base/0x5e4c78bf666d78fa1e751abc84cf9933d17b1736d4605f400173ac63ac52b1f8

❀24πŸŽ‰24πŸ‘21😁20🀩19πŸ”₯15

17 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTCβ‰ˆ2,790 views102 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺ™ $p0 Grabbed a bag. Solid tech. The only thing holding it back, in my opinion, is the Bags App launch. On a stronger launchpad, this could've had a much bigger send. Either way, I'm bullish on the vision and will be watching this closely. The OS for creators πŸ‘‡ https://x.com/Crypto_Litty/status/2078053547174703418 https://dexscreener.com/solana/i1qcvutpv37h6wnqzq3etac3oye9ksjjs7rxa4j7prp

❀25πŸ‘20😁19πŸŽ‰16🀩12πŸ”₯10

17 Jul 2026, 07:20 UTCβ‰ˆ2,550 views130 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺΆ $VANTIS Aped this, launched on Virtual and its like first AI software factory on RH chain. Virtuals launch, so normally they go slowly. So hopefully this will run. https://x.com/vantis_ai/status/2077809652709093794 And the dev is $jtvo dev btw https://x.com/lucaxyzz 0xB6d695d5fbcEbD837f6b9f214c9BeeE8bA90762B https://app.virtuals.io/virtuals/111724

🀩22πŸŽ‰19πŸ”₯19πŸ‘16❀14😁12❀‍πŸ”₯8πŸ’―8

16 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTCβ‰ˆ2,840 views135 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺ™ $SOLdiers Aped some in this dip, would love to see a good runner on sol CHAIN. https://dexscreener.com/solana/b4jm2z5daqncjtsfm4f8v5pc88ka8fk3oycswefsq9br

πŸŽ‰26πŸ‘22πŸ”₯19πŸ₯°15❀13πŸ’―9😁9❀‍πŸ”₯8

16 Jul 2026, 03:55 UTCβ‰ˆ2,110 views159 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺΆ $Shrek Aped this some here, looks like the main runner for Bow fun launchpad, and since the Noxa situation is really really bad so i am expecting to see runners on other launchpads. Chart: https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x493110ced08094d7ba7edb7fa4acbd49d11f8bb5 CA: 0x4cAAfd62303421b8d93c87F1c465F657FF893b03

❀‍πŸ”₯26🀩22πŸ”₯20πŸ₯°19πŸŽ‰17πŸ‘16❀14πŸ’―14

14 Jul 2026, 16:51 UTCβ‰ˆ4,830 views236 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🚨 THE CRIB | EARLY GEM πŸͺ™ $ROBBINGHOOD πŸ“Š Market Cap: $33.2K πŸ’§ Liquidity: $13.6K πŸ“ˆ Volume: $30.1K ⏱️ Age: 13 Minutes ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🧠 Initial Thoughts β€’ Fresh launch β€’ Decent early volume β€’ Worth watching for a trend reversal β€’ micro-cap ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ πŸ“„ Contract Address 6fkhFEPL1KjipJkAuJg6gCQmHsnvwfhJXUyjV2Tspump ⚠️ NFA/DYOR https://dexscreener.com/solana/8y7wwhTi3Y29cgHYKnruBrm231rhq1Z2QdmHbUQEio1V

πŸ¦„88❀26πŸŽ‰20πŸ‘20🀩18πŸ”₯16😁14πŸ₯°13

10 Jul 2026, 22:23 UTCβ‰ˆ3,520 views96 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

πŸͺ™ $DEXBULL Aped this some, been watching since launch thought it might be just some farm but its holding and going pretty well despite of all volume at RH chain rn. So bought some here, as i see Dextools following them and openly supporting too. https://x.com/DEXToolsApp/status/2075152451540295861 6xCtR2Eq1VumsoRdNutcfSQfLMk7xUa2BrMx18tqpump

πŸ¦„20❀15πŸ”₯11❀‍πŸ”₯9πŸ’―8πŸ₯°8😍8πŸ‘7

9 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTCβ‰ˆ2,220 views86 reactionsread 15 August 2026

πŸ”΅ $B420 JUST wokeup and aped this new base token 0xB200000000000000000000231d6C1F1CE455ba32 https://dexscreener.com/base/0x36543216f3e01e4f69c92c043440306196db83f030acedb182bf87f40f3b33df

🀩15πŸ”₯14πŸ‘11❀10πŸŽ‰8❀‍πŸ”₯7πŸ’―7😁6

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @D_CRIB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank β€” 896,685 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions β€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ—§π—›π—˜ 𝗖π—₯π—œπ—•β€ (@D_CRIB), 9,716 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/D_CRIB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.