Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DXB ICT SIGNALS FREE TRIAL

@DXBSIGNALSICT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

66subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001580424216
TypeChannel
Username@DXBSIGNALSICT
DescriptionWhatsapp : https://wa.me/971557031454 Octafx & Exness ib rebate programme Dm me
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DXBSIGNALSICT

Growth

667 August 2026 — 66 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66 subscribers7 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 65–67 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:0266no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:1166first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 January 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 February 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
37
Videos
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍150.0%
🔥150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 January 2024 to 5 February 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Feb 2024, 13:42 UTC244 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Market analysis for Gold XAUUSD (1D). Not too sure on gold but these sellside liquidity pools look good to be used as the draw on liquidity.

5 Feb 2024, 13:39 UTC236 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Market analysis for NAS100 (1D, 4h). This is not a signal, it's just speculation and analysis requested by a channel member.

3 Feb 2024, 11:54 UTC156 viewsread 10 August 2026

P.S. if you purchased a monthly membership and you do not DM me @AskTTNow your membership will not be extended. On the way to training now, have a good weekend all!

3 Feb 2024, 11:29 UTC139 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

They called their shit DXB ICT PREMIUM. Bitch I'm not ICT, I'm Trader Theory 😂

3 Feb 2024, 10:55 UTC127 viewsread 10 August 2026

So we're clear, the originator of this message is Trader Theory @AskTTNow You are being scammed by the person forwarding my messages to their own channel

3 Feb 2024, 10:54 UTC115 viewsread 10 August 2026

Turns out someone is leaking this chat to another channel. If anyone has any info on who is doing this I will give you some cash DM me now @AskTTNow

2 Feb 2024, 21:42 UTC110 viewsread 10 August 2026

Lack of trades due to low probability market conditions. February the market will clean up. If you purchased a monthly membership DM me and I will extend it for you @AskTTNow

31 Jan 2024, 13:09 UTC111 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

FOMC today at 2pm EST, not ideal for day trading. Markets will consolidate then once news comes out it will rip both sides. I do anticipate that they will keep US interest rates the same or lower them though.

👍1

30 Jan 2024, 13:52 UTC110 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

FOMC and NFP this week. Trading Wednesday NY session to Friday is not ideal. Will monitor and post any trades if I see something high probability.

25 Jan 2024, 15:03 UTC114 viewsread 10 August 2026

No trades this week so far, the market has been really bad, mostly consolidation in Forex. Hopefully market conditions are better next week. January is not good for trading generally, that's why ICT normally starts his trading in February.

20 Jan 2024, 13:59 UTC135 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

For iPhone you still have to use their Mobile Trading app, but for Windows Desktop you can download MT4/5 also from their files to download section.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @DXBSIGNALSICT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,207,630 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DXB ICT SIGNALS FREE TRIAL” (@DXBSIGNALSICT), 66 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DXBSIGNALSICT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.