Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

DPRK ISG Information Bureau

@DPRK_ISG

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

528subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002000377777
TypeChannel
Username@DPRK_ISG
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DPRK_ISG

Growth

5165285226 August 2026 — 517 subscribers6 August 2026 — 516 subscribers6 August 2026 — 516 subscribers12 August 2026 — 528 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 514–530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 13:59528+12
6 Aug 2026, 18:33516no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:30516-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:18517first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.2%
avg views ÷ 528 subscribers
Avg views / post
85.7
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held18 (3 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,542
Reactions total68
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

68 reactions across 18 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍68100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC56 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

당결정을 높이 받들고 기관차수리에서 혁신을 일으키고있다. -김종태전기기관차련합기업소에서- https://www.redstartv.org/photo/world_and_korea/dprk/8-0-9415

👍5

5 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC82 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Premier Pak Thae Song Inspects Kim Jong Tae Electric Locomotive Complex and Posan Iron Works On-Site August 5, Pyongyang (Voice of Korea - RSTV) Comrade Pak Thae Song, Member of the Presidium of the Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea and Premier of the Cabinet of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, made a field survey of the Kim Jong Tae Electric Locomotive Complex and th

👍4

5 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

박태성 내각총리 김종태전기기관차련합기업소와 보산제철소를 현지료해 (평양 8월 5일발 조선의 소리 - 붉은별TV) [조선어] [English] [Русский] [中国语] 조선로동당 중앙위원회 정치국 상무위원회 위원이며 조선민주주의인민공화국 내각총리인 박태성동지가 김종태전기기관차련합기업소와 보산제철소를 현지에서 료해하였다. 김종태전기기관차련합기업소를 찾은 총리는 당 제9차대회 결정을 높이 받들고 기업소가 맡은 중요정책과제수행에서 혁신적성과를 이룩하고있는 이곳 로동계급을 고무해주었다. 총리는 각종 차량들의 생산실태와 도금공정의 현대화추진정형, 새로 제작한 궤도전차의 운행안정성과 의장품의 질 등을 구체적으로 료해하면서 일군들과 로동계급이 새시대가 요구하는 창조의 높이를 잘 알고 차량제작의 질적수준을 더욱 제고하며 도금직장을 종합적이며 현대적

👍4

5 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC59 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Statement Issued by Kim Yo Jong, Deputy Department Director of the Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea August 5, Pyongyang (KCNA - RSTV) The full text of the statement “The Possession of Preemptive Strike Capability by Japan, a War Criminal State, Is a Grave Threat Destroying International Peace and Stability” issued by Kim Yo Jong, Deputy Department Director of the Central Committee of the Workers' Par

👍5

5 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC60 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

김여정 조선로동당 중앙위원회 부장 담화 발표 (평양 8월 5일발 조선중앙통신 - 붉은별TV) [조선어] [English] [Русский] [中国语] 김여정 조선로동당 중앙위원회 부장이 5일에 발표한 담화 《전범국 일본의 선제공격능력보유는 국제평화와 안정을 파괴하는 중대위협이다》의 전문은 다음과 같다.

👍5

5 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

International News in DPRK Media (August 4, 2026) The international news published on page 6 of Rodong Sinmun dated August 4, 2026 carries an article exposing the shameless plunder of resources and peace-disrupting acts by Western countries, remarks by President Xi Jinping on the tasks arising in national defence and army modernization, the exposure by the Russian Foreign Minister of Western anti-Russian hostile act

👍2

5 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC59 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

국제소식 (2026년 8월 4일) [조선어] [English] [Русский] [中国语] 로동신문 2026년 8월 4일자 제6면에 게재된 국제소식은 서방나라들의 파렴치한 자원략탈과 평화파괴행위를 폭로한 글, 습근평주석의 국방 및 군대현대화 과업에 대한 언급, 로씨야외무상의 서방 반로씨야적대행위 폭로, 아프리카나라들의 엘니뇨 대처 준비 호소, 일본의 《국가정보국》 조작에 대한 중국의 비난, 파키스탄의 간염예방치료사업 강화 립장, 중국과 인디아, 슬로벤스꼬, 그리스 등 여러 나라에서의 자연피해, 프랑스에서의 들불피해, 체육선수들에게 유익한 식품에 대한 상식 등을 전하고있다.

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC59 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The West, Facing Reality, Discusses Korea's Economic Achievements August 4 (RSTV) The Wall Street Journal, a globally authoritative American economic newspaper, recently published an unusual report describing the Democratic People's Republic of Korea as “the world's most surprising economic success story”, drawing the attention of the international community. This is assessed as an event showing that the “collapse t

👍3

5 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC59 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

현실을 마주한 서방, 조선의 경제적성취를 론하다 (8월 4일발 붉은별TV) [조선어] [English] [Русский] [中国语] 세계적인 권위를 가진 미국의 경제신문 《월 스트리트 저널》이 최근 조선민주주의인민공화국을 《세계에서 가장 놀라운 경제성공 이야기》로 표현하는 이례적인 보도를 내놓아 국제사회의 주목을 받고있다. 이는 오랫동안 서방 언론과 전문가들이 고수해온 《붕괴 론》과 《경제파탄 론》이 현실 앞에서 여지없이 무너지고있음을 보여주는 사건으로 평가된다. 해당 보도는 수년간 조선을 방문한 외국인들의 증언과 최신 통계자료를 바탕으로 평양과 지방에서 진행중인 변화의 실체를 비교적 객관적으로 전하고있다. 평양 시내에서는 이미 호출택시봉사가 활성화되고 중국산 전기차를 비롯한 각종 외제 승용차들이 늘어나고있으며, QR코드를 리용한 이동지

👍2

4 Aug 2026, 18:09 UTC76 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

The Path of a War Merchant Disguised as “Democracy” and “Peace” The Danger-Fraught Moves of the Republic of Korea Strengthening Military Collusion with NATO and the European Union August 4 (RSTV) Recently, the Ri Jae Myong regime of the Republic of Korea (ROK) has rapidly strengthened military ties with NATO and the European Union, and even the possibility of direct military support to Kiev is being raised. These mo

👍7

4 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC71 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

《민주》와 《평화》의 탈을 쓴 전쟁상인의 길 나토 및 유럽동맹과의 군사적결탁을 강화하는 대한민국의 위험천만한 행보 (8월 4일발 붉은별TV) [조선어] [English] [Русский] [中国语] 최근 대한민국의 리재명 정권이 나토 및 유럽동맹과의 군사적 유대를 급격히 강화하면서 끼예브에 대한 직접적인 군사 지원 가능성마저 제기되고 있다. 《평화》와 《민주》라는 미명 아래 진행되는 이 행보는, 실상 대한민국의 경제적 파탄을 군수산업으로 타개하고 나토의 아시아 진출에 편승하려는 위험한 도박임을 보여준다. 지난 6월 10일 브류쎌에서 열린 리재명과 유럽동맹 수뇌들의 회담에서 채택된 공동성명은 조선민주주의인민공화국과 로씨야를 겨냥한 적대적 내용을 담고 있다. 성명은 《조선민주주의인민공화국은 결코 핵무기보유국으로 인정될 수 없다》는 주장을 반

👍3

4 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC69 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

International News in DPRK Media (August 3, 2026) The international news carried on Page 6 of Rodong Sinmun dated August 3, 2026, reports on an article exposing Israel's shameless territorial seizure manoeuvres and their actual state, Russia's emphasis on the importance of patriotic education, China's clarification of its nuclear force policy, Pakistan's stand on the struggle against human trafficking crimes, the su

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DPRK_ISG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 588,849 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DPRK ISG Information Bureau” (@DPRK_ISG), 528 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DPRK_ISG.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.