5 measurements spanning 20 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 308–314 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 04:24
310
+1
21 Aug 2026, 05:12
309
-1
14 Aug 2026, 00:56
310
-3
8 Aug 2026, 07:35
313
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:02
313
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 15 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
246 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
82
33.3%
🔥
55
22.4%
👍
52
21.1%
❤🔥
20
8.13%
💘
11
4.47%
😍
6
2.44%
💯
5
2.03%
👏
4
1.63%
⚡
2
0.813%
✍
2
0.813%
👀
2
0.813%
🤓
2
0.813%
🥰
2
0.813%
🤩
1
0.407%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
214
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 13 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DOSAEVADESIGN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 September 2025 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Делюсь одним из моих любимых кейсов 🤍
Нужно было создать с нуля продающую презентацию для элитной загородной резиденции, разработать визуальную концепцию и стилистику, название.
Я влюбилась в этот дом как говорится с первого взгяда. В процессе работала с копирайтером, фотографом, выезжала на объект и видела всю эту эстетику вживую. Буквально пищала от радости, с какой красотой мне довелось работать.
Смотреть кейс …
На прошлой неделе попробовала Framer, это конструктор сайтов, как будто Тильда и Фигма в одном флаконе ❤️. Без кодинга собираешь сайт прямо на платформе, добавляешь анимации.
Собрала за пару дней мини-сайт про одно направление своей деятельности, арт-дирекшн в сфере элитной недвижимости. Смотреть сайт
➕Из плюсов Framer:
1) на бесплатном тарифе можно собрать полноценный сайт + куча бесплатных шаблонов под любую нишу…
Как я использую Claude 🤍
Я сейчас погружена в процесс изучения Claude Code, смотрю, как его можно применять для работы и для обычной жизни.
Из того, что уже попробовала:
🔢 Попросила его систематизировать все мои шрифты на компьютере, он их собрал и разложил по видам: антиква, гротеск, декоративные, моноширинные... Теперь у меня красивые и удобные папочки с типами шрифтов 🗂
🔢 Использую его в связке Figma + Claude C…
Вчера за несколько часов собрала сайт на Claude Code и я в шоке!! 😳
Ну как в шоке, я в принципе люблю позаморачиваться и поперфекционировать, поэтому у меня это заняло чуть больше времени, чем могло бы.. и я еще его буду дорабатывать) Но всё равно, ещё вчера это был просто список задач в голове, а сегодня уже рабочий сайт с адаптивами.
Зацените: https://brand-buro.netlify.app/
Клауд помог сразу выгрузить, правки мо…
Друзья, у меня новый личный проект 🎬
Моя душа давно просила делать мульты. И вот я сделала пилот.
Первый сериал про финансовую грамотность, мне близка эта тема. Это реальная история. Все совпадения неслучайны 😅
Серия 1 из 5. Создано на реальных событиях ✍️
Узнаёшь себя? Пиши свою историю, сделаю мульт про тебя 👉 @EEDOSAEVA
Кто такой Claude?
Пропала на полгода из канала 🤪, была занята интересным проектом, но вот снова потянуло к нейронкам.
Первое что попробовала после паузы - Claude. Все вокруг только о нём и говорят, решила разобраться сама.
Буду тестировать и делиться. А вы уже пробовали?
claude.ai - бесплатно
Привет! Как и обещала, собрала для вас подборку бесплатных нейросетей.
Полностью бесплатных почти нет, но у многих есть тарифы, где можно закрыть задачу без оплаты. Это часть 1, будет ещё продолжение, так что сохраняйте пост, чтобы не потерять ✨
Nano Banana 🍌
Платный сервис, но сейчас можно попробовать бесплатно через Gemini (нужен VPN). Делает стильные генерации для продуктов и креативов, легко подстраивается под з…
Nano Banana. Часть 2 🍌✨
Возможности у этой нейросети почти безграничны, всё зависит только от вашей фантазии.
Я показала лишь малую часть примеров 💡
И самое классное - сейчас можно попробовать Nano Banana бесплатно в Gemini 🙌
А вы что первым делом попробовали бы сгенерировать? 👀
#нейросети #nanobanana #aiart #aidesign #kreaai #midjourney #нейродизайн #aiillustration #digitalart #aicreator #генерацияизображений #a…
Ребята, спасибо большое всем, кто проголосовал, для меня это очень важно 🙌
В ближайшее время подготовлю для вас полезную инфу по бесплатным нейросетям, а потом разберём продвинутые фишки. 🙏🏻
✍️ Работа с текстовыми моделями, что там можно делать19%
🎨 Продвинутые фишки нейросетей для дизайнеров40%
💬 Другое, напишу в комментариях2%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Signed Elena Dosaeva
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @DOSAEVADESIGN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
✍️ Работа с текстовыми моделями, что там можно делать19%
🎨 Продвинутые фишки нейросетей для дизайнеров40%
💬 Другое, напишу в комментариях2%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 730,205 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DOSAEVA DESIGN — Лена, покажи как в ИИ” (@DOSAEVADESIGN), 310 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DOSAEVADESIGN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
