Channel
@DOGS6888
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
143subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002090166789 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DOGS6888 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DOGS6888 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 143 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:58 | 145 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 148 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:53 | 148 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 3 August 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
18 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 27.8% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 22.2% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 22.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2024 to 22 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
有没有大佬认识卖monetization类型账号的渠道，请DM我 I need this account Digital Turbine Link: https://webflow-prod.digitalturbine.com/ AppLovin Link: https://www.applovin.com/ MTG Link: https://www.mintegral.com/ 介绍有茶费
Signed PeterPan
play：https://t.me/EarnPlayCenterBot?startapp=Peter
Signed PeterPan
🥂
Signed Francis
🤔最近在做 Ton生态的项目，等上线后会发群里，最近这个账号登录的少 有事情，直接私信我微信
🌚3👍3
Signed PeterPan
https://followin.io/zh-Hans/feed/12616827/ZnJvbT1pb3NzaGFyZSZ0cz0xNzI0Mzk2MDYzMzM3JnRpbWV6b25lPTg
Signed 3DOGS丨潘潘
🔵BASE 跟单的看看还有没有捏着这个币，多注意社区有没有动静，今晚大概率拉盘 $TAD 0x55027a5b06f4340cC4C82DCC74C90cA93dcb173E
👍2
Signed 3DOGS丨潘潘
周四下午就提前喊兄弟们准备，有的兄弟已经吃4x跑了 （狗庄跑路了，不贪的兄弟应该也翻倍走了）
Signed 3DOGS丨潘潘
🔹 杜嘉班纳的演员狗 ✉️ 预计明天公射 丨 $FEFE ❌ https://t.me/fefedogcoin
Signed 3DOGS丨潘潘
📣3DOGS的ETH 近期跟单基础参数推荐 仅供参考，跟单有风险，盈亏自负
Signed 3DOGS丨潘潘
主网 #ETH 监控的聪明钱推送，23x的利润 $TRUMPX 0xD223a9E25C34bdf0339Caa62b28b1E005081E1E7
Signed 3DOGS丨潘潘
主网的 $FUKU 35x的利润
Signed 3DOGS丨潘潘
📣 年费会员们私信我一下，之前的微信群被干封了，进新的🦦
Signed 3DOGS丨潘潘
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @DOGS6888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@DOGS6888 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“3DOGS丨潘潘聪明钱分享💸💸💸” (@DOGS6888), 143 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DOGS6888.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.