4 Jun 2025, 18:31 UTC293 viewsread 13 August 2026
INITIAL
Channel
ᴅᴇɴᴢᴇʟᴡ - 04
@DNZ31M
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
22subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002150930304 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DNZ31M |
| Created | 19 July 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DNZ31M |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 22 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 22 | first reading |
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 19 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
98 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5310291650604446156 | 51 | 52.0% | |
| custom 5463415133151713746 | 17 | 17.3% | |
| custom 5384503600238051800 | 12 | 12.2% | |
| custom 5190814568191899733 | 7 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5296295636382010303 | 5 | 5.10% | |
| custom 5417906961058392528 | 4 | 4.08% | |
| custom 5262558805710876774 | 2 | 2.04% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 98reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2024 to 4 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
4 Jun 2025, 17:22 UTC292 viewsread 13 August 2026
CHAT RULES
4 Jun 2025, 17:07 UTC291 viewsread 13 August 2026
Мы открыли новый канал,так как потеряли права.Мы ждем вас здесь – @DNZ04D
28 Mar 2025, 20:53 UTC856 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
ОБЪЯВЛЕНИЕ!!!🌟 наш владелец сменился.👟
custom 54634151331517137465custom 54179069610583925284custom 51908145681918997333custom 52962956363820103033
22 Jul 2024, 05:53 UTC≈4,450 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026
boost ✅
custom 531029165060444615618custom 54634151331517137465custom 53845036002380518004custom 52962956363820103032
20 Jul 2024, 19:48 UTC≈5,950 views35 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video
Baby, dale, ponte pa' mí, follow me 🥊 🌟🔡🔡- CLUB 🪙owner
custom 531029165060444615622custom 53845036002380518005custom 51908145681918997334custom 54634151331517137464
19 Jul 2024, 21:19 UTC≈3,680 views19 reactionsread 13 August 2026
July 20, 2024 - We officially have the name "DenzelW - 04". If we see something similar or related, we will ask you to change it. Otherwise, other measures will be taken.
custom 531029165060444615611custom 53845036002380518003custom 54634151331517137463custom 52625588057108767742
19 Jul 2024, 19:30 UTCviews —
Channel created
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @DNZ31M. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 270,373 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ᴅᴇɴᴢᴇʟᴡ - 04” (@DNZ31M), 22 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DNZ31M.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.