21 Mar 2025, 18:23 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «东南亚-骗子曝光-悬赏-吃瓜-通缉»
Channel
东南亚-骗子曝光-悬赏-吃瓜-通缉
@DMBG001
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002451925086 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DMBG001 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DMBG001 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 19 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:50 | 19 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 31 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 15
- Videos
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 46s
- Average length
- 1m 23s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 31 October 2024 to 21 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
17 Dec 2024, 04:37 UTC≈3,040 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
kk红楼啊，这么大的公司，真的不会不给钱吧？🤣🤣事实真相就是确实没有给钱，有聊天记录可查。（飞机群炒群聊天，干活了不认账了咧。聊天记录能查到吧？报账凭证核对信息什么的，都看烂了？还是看懵逼了呀？）扯撒子皮吗？真的是，群里聊天的那些人用眼睛就可以看见了，结账交接了，给我扯死规定。我不要赚钱的吗？白给你做嫁衣呢？（还真是人善被狗咬，狗善被吃肉）
1 Nov 2024, 10:16 UTCviews —
Channel name was changed to «东盟曝光情报站-悬赏-吃瓜-投稿»
1 Nov 2024, 10:09 UTC≈3,110 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo
#南昌工学院 10月30日晚，南昌工学院一男生持刀捅刺女生。女生发出撕心裂肺的哀嚎“救命啊，我错了”， 但男生仍不停捅刺对方，这是什么深仇大恨啊！
👍1
1 Nov 2024, 10:06 UTCviews —
东南亚-骗子曝光-悬赏-吃瓜-通缉 pinned Deleted message
31 Oct 2024, 17:32 UTC≈5,140 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo
#全网曝光 付费悬赏 各位群友避雷一下这几个狗逼贱狗做通道的，欠我几十万 拖一个月了一直没回款，钱不多，但是这些傻逼实在嚣张 专跑盘口钱，好几个兄弟的公司也被这些跑了不少钱，他们专门走三方得到信任，然后跑盘口的钱。各位同行一定要注意他们。 顺便悬赏一下，提供有效线索位置10000U 抓到人30000U（真实有效，可上压）财富热线 xzgg1234
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @DMBG001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,002,787 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚-骗子曝光-悬赏-吃瓜-通缉” (@DMBG001), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DMBG001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.