А ещё, ребятки, у меня появился наконец аккаунт в твиттере, ну или Х Короче кому не сложно подпишитесь: https://x.com/dk_solar0?s=11
custom 53437861334509552156⚡1❤1

Channel
@DK_solar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
138subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001781152681 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DK_solar |
| Description | Добро пожаловать в темное царство. Приготовьтесь погрузиться в таинственный мир авторской руманги Стънь: Между мирами. ‼️ • Коммишки открыты • Лс: @Solar_creator0 • Инста: https://www.instagram.com/dk_solar0?igsh=Y3h5Z2h5dHo1eGFi&utm_source=qr |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DK_solar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 138 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:34 | 138 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 989 |
| Reactions total | 220 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
236 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 48 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5343786133450955215 | 36 | 15.3% | |
| custom 5467702902082523444 | 24 | 10.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5330561233361848817 | 22 | 9.32% | |
| custom 5960935408756855775 | 8 | 3.39% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 2.54% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 2.12% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 🍌 | 2 | 0.847% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 0.847% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.847% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 236reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А ещё, ребятки, у меня появился наконец аккаунт в твиттере, ну или Х Короче кому не сложно подпишитесь: https://x.com/dk_solar0?s=11
custom 53437861334509552156⚡1❤1
Мне сложно определиться кого я буду рисовать дальше из бравлеров, поэтому в коммах назовите своего любимого, кто шарит) Выберу кого порисую ✍️
❤2❤🔥2
Моя любимая Виллоу 🌹 Вспомнила про Бравл, порисую своих любимок
custom 533056123336184881712🔥6custom 53437861334509552155❤1💋1🦄1
Купила вчера программу для анимаций, вот немножечко практикуюсь, сама изучаю все, надеюсь, что со временем смогу делать крутые меме ☺️
custom 53437861334509552158❤3🔥2custom 53305612333618488171
Простите, музыка ток такая
custom 53437861334509552156⚡4💋3custom 53305612333618488172
— Ой, смотрите, солнышко вышло. Нет, Рогнар, это кара небесная. 🙅♂️ Лор: Равимир ( с крылышками) князь солнца и света, обиделся, что брата кто-то искренне полюбил, как и он человеческую девушку, ну и пернатый спалил своего братца бате. Батя лишил своего второго сына имени, отныне Рогнар-это князь тьмы, который не мог выбраться из своего леса и проклятий. Из-за предательства брата они вступили в битву, которая длил…
🔥7custom 53437861334509552156custom 53305612333618488173❤2⚡1💋1
Вот вам небольшой кусочек видио, пока я занимаюсь разработка рефов для персов комикса и переписываю часть сюжета 🙏 #Стънь
❤10custom 53437861334509552154❤🔥2custom 53305612333618488172🦄1
Все, теперь я свободна и будет больше контента 🙏 можно только помолиться на нормальные баллы, хоть бы приходной на платку
❤16❤🔥5custom 53305612333618488172custom 53437861334509552151
Все мои хорошие, погнала на второй этап экзаменов 🙏 отсутствовать в сети буду 2 денька, пожелайте наисложнейших заданий!
custom 546770290208252344415🔥5❤4
🌺🛟🏄♀️🥭🐚 Вот вам для летнего Вайба, а у меня завтра экзамен по рисунку и живописи…
🔥13custom 54677029020825234446custom 59609354087568557756🍌2💘2❤1
Всем спасибо за поддержку, простите за количество сообщений здесь, я скоро восстановлюсь в рисовании 🙏
❤14
УРАААА, БОЖЕ, НА ВТОРОЙ ГОД МУЧЕНИЙ Я ХОТЯБЫ ДАЛЬШЕ ПРОХОЖУ 🙏🙏🙏
❤🔥15🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @DK_solar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 205,481 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝓓𝓪𝓻𝓴 𝓚𝓲𝓷𝓰𝓭𝓸𝓶 {16+}” (@DK_solar), 138 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DK_solar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.