Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [ПОЛУРЕСТ]~♪♫🪩𝔻𝕀𝕊ℂ𝕆—ҕᴀᴘ ᴘыськи^^_·[𝐇𝐓𝐅]_18+

Channel

[ПОЛУРЕСТ]~♪♫🪩𝔻𝕀𝕊ℂ𝕆—ҕᴀᴘ ᴘыськи^^_·[𝐇𝐓𝐅]_18+

@DISCOXFLAKY0CANON

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

139subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003611736499
TypeChannel
Username@DISCOXFLAKY0CANON
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DISCOXFLAKY0CANON

Growth

137142139.57 August 2026 — 142 subscribers8 August 2026 — 137 subscribers8 August 2026 — 137 subscribers15 August 2026 — 139 subscribers1397 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 136–143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:43139+2
8 Aug 2026, 23:16137no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:53137-5
7 Aug 2026, 19:19142first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
88.9%
avg views ÷ 139 subscribers
Avg views / post
124
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held16 (19 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total1,853
Reactions total361
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

361 reactions across 15 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥6016.6%
custom 5242335436801603336369.97%
custom 5199701224894522010328.86%
custom 5344045897367986451308.31%
custom 5247096167531034175298.03%
226.09%
custom 5267494320134455084184.99%
custom 5413376337496809654184.99%
custom 5201753806945146124113.05%
custom 5335008276859887540113.05%
custom 524708263838405426782.22%
😨82.22%
custom 524927355274134732071.94%
custom 528968627871393222871.94%
custom 534370780613237757971.94%
🏆71.94%
😢71.94%
custom 519990459159598952361.66%
🍓61.66%
😭61.66%
9 further kinds256.93%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 361reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DISCOXFLAKY0CANON. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 14:59 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «[ПОЛУРЕСТ]~♪♫🪩𝔻𝕀𝕊ℂ𝕆—ҕᴀᴘ ᴘыськи^^_·[𝐇𝐓𝐅]_18+»

8 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC39 views25 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Подписчики моего щп уже в курсе, но кто не знает у меня был очень изматывающий конфликт в семье, после которого я чувствую себя...мягко говоря очень не очень 😵😵😵 Я знаю что совсем не профессионально брать ресты когда есть столько планов, но сейчас мне действительно лучше сбавить колличество часов работы (рисования)🤍 Возможно скетчик сверху получит полноценку позже, у меня сейчас тяжёлое эмоциональное самочувствие 🤩 Л

😨8😢7😭6🙏4

7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC56 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Все, ждите вкусность🐱

🏆7❤‍🔥5🍌2

6 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC65 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кстати о гуро Хотите такую полноценку🙂?? 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 20 лайков 🌟🌟

❤‍🔥18💋5🍓4🔥2custom 52470826383840542672custom 52470961675310341752custom 52471878479029344212💊1

6 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC72 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Напоминаю: Тыкайте на зайца

custom 52470961675310341759

6 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC94 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Итак сегодня я закончила ещё двух зверят и это Флэки(Mitski) и Натти (Dee Snider) Кроме Петуньи которую я нарисую позже осталось ещё место и я решила дать вам выбор (мне самой сложновато выбрать 🤩) Кого ещё? 🌟🥹🌟🌟🌟🌟

custom 524709616753103417518custom 52470826383840542676❤‍🔥3🍓1💘1custom 52470758995803650941custom 52471878479029344211

31 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC134 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас я рисую кое что с пятью персами а готовы только два🥹🥹🥹🥹 Кстати ребятушки добейте 40 на гуро, люблю вас 🩲🩲

custom 541337633749680965418custom 52492735527413473206custom 53350082768598875405❤‍🔥1🍓1custom 52153792771591087391

27 Jul 2026, 13:30 UTC142 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Напоминалочка дэдэ кстати вот Нирвана гляньте

custom 526749432013445508485custom 51997012248945220104💊1custom 52896862787139322281

27 Jul 2026, 03:01 UTC164 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😇😇 ⭐⭐❤️🥰 😇💝💝💝💝💝💝 Сегодня решила сделать что то типо вайба эпохи возрождения, кстати это трейд с этим вот человечком https://t.me/evervessprincessOwX Как думаете стоит ли больше рисовать такого? 🤩 — Ну конечно красиво же 🥰 — КАКАЯ МИЛАЯ 🌟 — определенно да

custom 519970122489452201018custom 526749432013445508410custom 528968627871393222864💊1custom 52153792771591087391

25 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC142 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кстати скоро артик надеюсь вам понравится

custom 519970122489452201010custom 52017538069451461246custom 519990459159598952332custom 53350082768598875401

25 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC156 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

💜🤍💜💜🤍🤍🤍 🤍🤍🌟 💜🤍💜💜🤍💜💜🤍🤍💜 🤩🤩@BoBuzz_lover🤩🤩 🔤сем привет сегодня самый лучший день в моей жизни ведь мой подписчик мерчедел прислал мне значки и постеры!!! Качество отменное, значки прям прекрасно сделаны!!! Я просто не знаю как мне выразить свою благодарность моей любимой аудитории спасибо за то что вы есть ребята 🥺🥺🥺

❤‍🔥155custom 53350082768598875405custom 52017538069451461244💊1

23 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC138 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

5custom 51999045915959895233custom 52017538069451461241

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @DISCOXFLAKY0CANON. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Jul 2026, 17:39 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Нет я серьезно

  1. 175%
  2. 238%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 195,312 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[ПОЛУРЕСТ]~♪♫🪩𝔻𝕀𝕊ℂ𝕆—ҕᴀᴘ ᴘыськи^^_·[𝐇𝐓𝐅]_18+” (@DISCOXFLAKY0CANON), 139 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DISCOXFLAKY0CANON.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.