Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⌗🩹𝙄𝙉𝙎𝙋𝙀𝘾𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉.

@DIPLOOD

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

781subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002339715938
TypeChannel
Username@DIPLOOD
Description║▌▌│█ ║▌▌║▌║▌║▌▌│█ ︎︎ ︎︎𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙍𝙏:: 06.01.25 𝙏𝘼𝙆𝙀 𝘽𝙊𝙏 :: @inspectionsliv_bot ︎︎ ︎︎𝙄𝙉𝙄𝙏𝙄𝘼𝙇𝙎:: ⌗🩹︎︎. // ⌞𝙋𝙏⌝ ︎︎ ︎︎𝙈𝘼𝙍𝙍𝙄𝘼𝙂𝙀:: @HATEschool_andSCHOOLCHILD ║▌║▌▌│█ ║▌▌║▌║▌│█║
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/DIPLOOD

Growth

7817 Aug 2026, 17:40 — 781 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 01:47 — 781 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 17:408 Aug 2026, 01:47
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 780–782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 01:47781no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:40781first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
817
Videos
7
Links
787

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊1840.0%
custom 53593901791340298191022.2%
👻920.0%
👀817.8%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2025 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2026, 04:12 UTC169 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пр я в розыске le le le

🕊10👻3👀1

Signed ꜱᴜʙᴀ.ʀᴜ

8 Jun 2026, 15:17 UTC299 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кому то до сей пор не похуй?

👻3

8 Jun 2026, 15:13 UTC285 viewsread 8 August 2026

*мне пришлось зайти сюда ибо у меня бы делетнулся нах0й аккаунт

8 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC254 viewsread 8 August 2026

Майо иблищэ когда я захожу на этот акк а у меня пол лички делетнуло акки

7 Dec 2025, 19:10 UTC≈1,250 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#️⃣::🔤ew target🤩.. 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ https://t.me/+0Pyd3nmYr_owNDQy Я находился в этой сетке ещё с самого его основания, поднял его с колен, привёл туда кучу народа, друзей — и меня решили вышвырнуть после того, как я добился рекламы на канале у ютубера и предложил ему тоже вступить туда. Это их благодарность, я так понимаю ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎➖( spam material )➖ @inspectionsliv_bot || @inspectionsl

👀5🕊1

7 Dec 2025, 19:06 UTC≈1,100 viewsread 8 August 2026

#️⃣::🔤ew target🤩.. 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ @ocfeo_zam @haidgwn 2 акка уëбка, который внаглую спëр мои дорогие нфт, одно из них продал, а за второе шантажирует на голые фото и видео + деньги. ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎➖( spam material )➖ @inspectionsliv_bot || @inspectionsliv_bot

3 Dec 2025, 11:10 UTC≈1,130 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

#️⃣::🔤ew target🤩.. 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ https://t.me/+dSqpX49hl5Q0MWEy короч они пидары ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎➖( spam material )➖ @inspectionsliv_bot || @inspectionsliv_bot

custom 53593901791340298191

2 Dec 2025, 16:22 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 8 August 2026

#️⃣::🔤ew target🤩.. 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ https://t.me/+3T8ehWYaUl9mY2Zi ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎➖( spam material )➖ @inspectionsliv_bot || @inspectionsliv_bot

30 Nov 2025, 15:50 UTC≈1,120 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

#️⃣::🔤ew target🤩.. 🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️🌨️ @Lopiana Человек очень странный, пишет мне насчёт подруги, отправила ещё её фото. ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎ ︎︎➖( spam material )➖ @inspectionsliv_bot || @inspectionsliv_bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DIPLOOD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 916,210 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⌗🩹𝙄𝙉𝙎𝙋𝙀𝘾𝙏𝙄𝙊𝙉.” (@DIPLOOD), 781 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DIPLOOD.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.