来吧 巴萨今晚继续红卡

Channel
【东方汇】足球推单 体育新闻 体育资讯
@DFHtiyu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
215subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001857742053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DFHtiyu |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DFHtiyu |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 215 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 217 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 217 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 218 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 17 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
掸邦联 vs 拉科尼联 缅甸全国联赛 02/17 17:00 滚球大/小-上半场(0-0)[欧洲盘] 大 0.5/1 泰国 U20 vs 韩国 U20 亚洲杯U20 (在中国) 02/17 17:15 滚球韩国 U20 进球 : 大/小-上半场(0-0)[欧洲盘] 大 1
❤1
也门 U20 vs 伊朗 U20 亚洲杯U20 (在中国) 02/16 17:15 滚球也门 U20 进球: 大/小(0-4)[欧洲盘] 大 0.5 @3.27
足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (2 - 2) 印尼甲组联赛 佩西加雅加达 v 万隆 大 4.5
亚足联U20亚洲杯2025(在中国) 也门U20 v伊朗U20 足球 (滚球) 球队进球数: 伊朗U20 - 大 / 小 (0 - 2) 大 4
澳大利亚新南威尔斯联赛2 普罗斯佩联 v霍克斯伯里城 足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (2 - 1) 大 3.5/4
丹德农市 vs 普雷斯顿狮子队 澳大利亚维多利亚州全国超级联赛 02/14 16:45 滚球大/小-上半场(0-1)[欧洲盘] 大 1.5
澳大利亚维多利亚国家超级联赛 丹德农城 v普雷斯顿莱恩 足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (0 - 1) 大 2.5 / 3 @ 0.80 -------------------- 澳大利亚甲组联赛 墨尔本胜利 v威灵顿凤凰 足球 (滚球) 让球 (0 - 0) 墨尔本胜利 -0.5 / 1 @ 1.04
日本 U20 vs 泰国 U20 亚洲杯U20 (在中国) 02/14 17:15 滚球大/小-上半场(0-0)[欧洲盘] 大 1/1.5
Photo, posted without a caption
乌兹别克斯坦 U20 vs 也门 U20 亚洲杯U20 (在乌兹别克斯坦) 02/13 17:15 滚球大/小(1-0)[欧洲盘] 大 1.5/2
足球 (滚球) 大 / 小 (3 - 2) 澳大利亚新南威尔斯北部国家超级联赛 贝尔蒙特史云斯联 v 亚登斯顿 大 5.5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DFHtiyu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dianjingtuidan1 · 105,794
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 15 August 2026
@tiyuquan · 99,618
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“【东方汇】足球推单 体育新闻 体育资讯” (@DFHtiyu), 215 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DFHtiyu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.