Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

>DEDSEC:/

@DEDSEClulz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

689,967subscribers

-485 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001375904388
TypeChannel
Username@DEDSEClulz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DEDSEClulz

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

689,967692,218691,092.57 August 2026 — 690,452 subscribers7 August 2026 — 690,452 subscribers7 August 2026 — 690,568 subscribers8 August 2026 — 691,060 subscribers9 August 2026 — 691,615 subscribers10 August 2026 — 692,218 subscribers11 August 2026 — 690,017 subscribers12 August 2026 — 689,967 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -485. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 689,629–692,556 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:04689,967-50
11 Aug 2026, 06:42690,017-2,201
10 Aug 2026, 10:01692,218+603
9 Aug 2026, 12:32691,615+555
8 Aug 2026, 15:42691,060+492
7 Aug 2026, 15:24690,568+116
7 Aug 2026, 11:15690,452no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:09690,452first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 3 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.12%
avg views ÷ 689,967 subscribers
Avg views / post
62,900
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held21 (3 October 202410 August 2026)
Views total62,900
Reactions total672
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
13
Videos
1
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

59,535 reactions across 21 posts, in 55 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
26,71244.9%
👍7,57812.7%
💩5,0128.42%
😭4,8188.09%
😢2,1373.59%
🖕2,0763.49%
🔥1,5942.68%
❤‍🔥1,5172.55%
👏8711.46%
🤡8001.34%
🙏6641.12%
🫡6221.04%
🤣6011.01%
🗿5310.892%
🥰3700.621%
😱2530.425%
💔2490.418%
🆒2290.385%
🌭2280.383%
😁2180.366%
35 further kinds2,4554.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59,535reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,407
across the posts below
Posts paid on
21
of 21 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
424
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DEDSEClulz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 October 2024 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈62,900 views672 reactions3 Starsread 12 August 2026

Quick update on DeezLoad: We fixed the bug where notifications for new releases weren't coming through. Also, you'll now get notified when older releases get updated too — like when an artist adds old live albums or extra tracks to their page. A quick reminder: you can always check your follow list using the /follow command and jump straight to your favorite artists from there.

464👍93😴24🔥21🗿21💘16🙏9🥰8

12 May 2026, 19:03 UTC≈426,000 views2,311 reactions13 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

If Spotify links aren’t working right now, it’s because Spotify itself is down and has been unavailable for the past couple of hours. As a result, only tracks that were previously cached in the bot are still working, while new Spotify links can’t be processed. In my opinion, this is probably another case of “vibe coders” deploying AI-generated code without proper testing—and now they’ll need some time to fix it. So

1,200👍339🤡273🤣173💔77😱70🔥50🌭42

30 Apr 2026, 18:46 UTC≈444,000 views2,352 reactions63 Starsread 12 August 2026

The situation at Deezload is stabilizing. If no issues arise in the coming days, we will start gradually restoring the playlist track limits next week and remove the daily song limit, as it was before.

1,580👍237❤‍🔥164🔥97😢67👏62💋42😱39

23 Apr 2026, 23:05 UTC≈491,000 views3,435 reactions77 Starsread 12 August 2026

Our primary music provider in Deezload is no longer available and may not return. As a result, download speeds have significantly decreased. To mitigate this, we are introducing temporary limitations: the free playlist download cap is now set to 100 tracks, along with a daily limit on the number of songs. Once the situation improves, we will restore the previous higher limits. For now, we can only hope that conditi

😢1,660😭663388🫡377👍102💔95🗿38😐35

17 Mar 2026, 19:21 UTC≈608,000 views2,735 reactions51 Starsread 12 August 2026

Unfortunately, we’ve been having some big problems with the connection speed to Telegram for the second day in a row. Because of that, uploading ZIP files in Deezload takes a really long time… or sometimes just stops completely. 😭 We’re really sorry about this and for the inconvenience it’s causing. We know it’s frustrating, and we truly wish we could fix it right away. The worst part is that there’s nothing we can

1,450😭541👍219🫡195🙏97💩65🤮38🥰37

12 Feb 2026, 08:34 UTC≈589,000 views2,645 reactions37 Starsread 12 August 2026

The bot is back online! Thanks for your patience ❤️

1,880👍255🔥174🖕65❤‍🔥56💩49👌40🥰35

12 Feb 2026, 08:16 UTC≈555,000 views1,149 reactions11 Starsread 12 August 2026

The bot is expected to be restored within approximately two hours. We appreciate your patience. Due to internet speed limitations, the process cannot be completed any faster. The migration is time-consuming because of the large size of the bot’s database.

776👍104👏58🫡50👌37🌭27🙏26❤‍🔥22

12 Feb 2026, 07:48 UTC≈519,000 views1,365 reactions10 Starsread 12 August 2026

The server that hosted Deezload is currently down. I’m already working on fixing the issue. Please don’t spam me with messages — it slows down the recovery process. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

857👍175🙏117🖕47🍌35🥰28🤬26😁26

7 Jan 2026, 13:52 UTC≈630,000 views3,400 reactions424 Starsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ Update on Spotify Playlists in Deezload The Spotify API is still down, and support hasn’t responded yet. But don’t worry — we’ve implemented workarounds! ✅ Playlist functionality is almost fully restored Song links now work in most cases Album links are back, thanks to the new workaround

🖕1,810❤‍🔥658446👍193👏86🔥42🍌38😍38

7 Jan 2026, 00:00 UTC≈571,000 views5,977 reactions24 Starsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ Update on Spotify Playlists in Deezload I’ve implemented workarounds to retrieve track lists without using the official Spotify API. Spotify playlist downloads are working again, but there may be temporary issues in the near future. Because we are not using the API, it’s currently impossible to retrieve the ISRC tag for tracks. Due to this, there may be errors in playlists when an artist has, for example, the s

💩4,780841👏94👍90🙏47❤‍🔥31🔥2621

6 Jan 2026, 20:18 UTC≈443,000 views1,319 reactions5 Starsread 12 August 2026

⚠️ Update on Spotify playlists in Deezload Unfortunately, due to technical issues, Spotify playlists are currently not working in Deezload. Spotify’s API now has very strict limits, which the bot exhausts within just 5 minutes of operation. I’m actively working on alternative solutions. Song and album links are partially functional, but playlist processing is still very challenging, as Spotify doesn’t provide song

709😭292👍128🙏55🖕30🎄28🗿19💋16

8 Nov 2025, 07:57 UTC≈670,000 views2,955 reactions141 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

I’m getting a whole bunch of messages like, “Hey, the song loading is super slow!” or “It’s not downloading at all!” But, uh… that’s totally on telegram’s side. The bot can’t fix it. So if downloads aren’t working right now… we just gotta sit back, grab a donut, and wait. 🍩😴

👍1,330750🤣287🗿154😭153❤‍🔥61🐳54😘44

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @DEDSEClulz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,055,912 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“>DEDSEC:/” (@DEDSEClulz), 689,967 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DEDSEClulz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.