Channel name was changed to «рест ×༝ 𝕯𝙴𝟺𝚃𝙷𝙷𝙷𝙻𝙸𝙺𝙴 ;!»

Channel
×༝ 𝕯𝙴𝟺𝚃𝙷𝙷𝙷𝙻𝙸𝙺𝙴 ;!
@DEATHLIKE_unt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
41subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003343413728 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DEATHLIKE_unt |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DEATHLIKE_unt |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 41 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 39 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 40 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 39 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:10 | 39 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 38 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
200 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 71 | 35.5% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 33.5% | |
| 🍓 | 56 | 28.0% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.50% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 0.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 200 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
➡️н0 чему меня Рокси 3а 8се наши 70ды 6рака и научила - -- - - ЖД4ТЬ. и не 6р0саться в л06, Х0О0ТЯяЯяЯяЯя мне 8се же ре3кий стиль 60льше п0 нра8у❤️❤️❤️❤️ хе -- хе. я лю6ЛЮ Т0 К4к мы м0жем мн070му дру7 у дру7а научиться❤️❤️ например замечать даже тончайшую лесКУ в пр0еме
❤🔥5❤4🍓3
➡️8аще 6е3 пр0дыху ра60таю, ск0о0О0О0О0О0Р0 СК0Р0 8Ы П070ДИТЕ. 6удет. жара. или не скоро. я сам 3ае6ался ЖД4ТЬ 0КНА
❤4❤🔥4🍓4
Возникали ли когда-нибудь мысли о кардинальной смене стиле? ➡️та не т0 чт06ы. стиль пАНК Р0КЕРА 8п0лне п0дх0дит м0ей душе❤️❤️❤️❤️ 0н0 уд06н0е, не жмет места ш0 жать не д0лжн0, И 8Ы7ЛЯдит пи3дат0😎 к т0му же о6ра3 и у3на8аем0сть част0 ра60тают уже на мя сам070, я лиц0 0чень даже пу6личн0е:::::) а еще мне лень
❤4❤🔥4🍓3
➡️кт0 придумал хуйню ш0 детей сажают спаСАТЬ МИр???¿¿ 0ни еще десять ра3 дру7 в дру7а пере8лю6ляются, 8ыяснят 0тн0шения, а ты сиди жди с80е70 экшена в чужих с0ПЛЯХ🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄 тр0п и36итый д0нель3я, я лучше п0см0трю на черную транс женщину феминистку и лесбиянку с местоимениями оно/хрюк/ням/глоть размером с половину видимой галактики. эт0 х0тя 6ы худ0 6едн0 др0чи6ельн0
❤6❤🔥6🍓6
➡️я кнш не н08енький 6лять мерс купил, н0 эт0т 8аш ду6айский ш0к0лад рял тема😎😋
❤3❤🔥3🍓2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥5🍓5❤4💋1
Не думал ли ты с женой о других детях, или для вас и один ребёнок — это та ещё морока, хоть и любимая? ➡️не, х0чется с0сред0т0читься на 0дн0м. Люси ------ п0ка С4МЫЙ 8АЖный пр0ект в м0ей жи3ни, и мне 6ует 8падлу рассеи8аться на д8ух спин07ры3ах. я х0чу дать ей 8се 803М0ЖН0Е И НЕ803м0жное, 8едь 0на м0я лю6имая принцесса❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ м0е т80РЕНИЕ. типа нихуя се6е, с03да8ать т0ж 6ы8ает 8есел0 и Д4ЛЕК0 НЕ СКУчн0😱😵💫 …
❤🔥8❤7🍓6
➡️пр0д0лжай у мя щас 8станет
❤🔥3❤2🍓1
➡️0 кста 80яшка прик0льный н0 мир 708н0, 3ат0 части т3ла 0ОО00О0ОЧ 3А6А8Н0 РА3летаются п0 8СЕ1 картееЕеЕеЕеЕеЕеЕе АХАХАХАХАХАХАХХАХАХАХАХАХААХХАХААХАХ. эт1х малыш3й и3 мини и7р т4к ле7к0 уди8ить, НЯШН0СТЬ❤️
❤4❤🔥3💯2🍓1
➡️те6е я8н0 6рак08анную инструкцию дали, ИДИ УЖЕ 803ьми с80ю еду и т0ПАй на с8иданку а не пиши 708н0 фил0с08ские п0сты и схуяли ты меня 6л0кать решился мелю37а??????????
❤4❤🔥4💯3🍓1
➡️Ненавижу своих хейтеров. Это сброд из художников-аутистов в татуировках. Самый низший слой не только материально, но и морально, находящийся в пропасти. Вы — олицетворение мерзости человеческой и точка. Готов к дебатам
🍓3❤🔥2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @DEATHLIKE_unt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“×༝ 𝕯𝙴𝟺𝚃𝙷𝙷𝙷𝙻𝙸𝙺𝙴 ;!” (@DEATHLIKE_unt), 41 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DEATHLIKE_unt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.