Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑯𝑬𝑫𝟎𝑪𝑻𝑨𝑻𝑶𝑲

Channel

𝑯𝑬𝑫𝟎𝑪𝑻𝑨𝑻𝑶𝑲

@DDX99N

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

481subscribers

+451 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002404503078
TypeChannel
Username@DDX99N
Created30 January 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/DDX99N

Growth

30481255.57 August 2026 — 30 subscribers11 August 2026 — 30 subscribers15 August 2026 — 41 subscribers22 August 2026 — 481 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net +451. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 23:35481+440
15 Aug 2026, 19:4641+11
11 Aug 2026, 04:0230no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:5430first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 30 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.624%
avg views ÷ 481 subscribers
Avg views / post
3.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held9 (30 January 202510 August 2026)
Views total3
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 04:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

141 reactions across 5 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1510.6%
🥰149.93%
🔥128.51%
💔107.09%
custom 542283334438147060396.38%
❤‍🔥85.67%
🕊85.67%
custom 540449468443107939274.96%
custom 543588679367106773953.55%
💋53.55%
🤡53.55%
🍓42.84%
custom 533480166745809800532.13%
custom 587080163310489185832.13%
custom 587314686563713375732.13%
💯32.13%
😈32.13%
custom 521296275675967347321.42%
custom 521298004400303875721.42%
custom 521573074721782847221.42%
9 further kinds1812.8%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2025 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
154
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 8 we hold a reading for · 88%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DDX99N. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 January 2025 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 23:44 UTC50 views0 reactions101 Starsread 11 August 2026

She looked неhappy, so I looked happy

Signed özlem

31 Dec 2025, 23:03 UTC766 views9 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026

С Новым годом хуесосы

custom 53255353871861210832custom 53529293886796785912custom 58709036729379111202custom 52129800440030387571custom 58708016331048918581custom 58731468656371337571

Signed тихий дв

3 Jun 2025, 23:25 UTC≈1,300 views17 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026

кто любит тихого + в комм

custom 54358867936710677395custom 54044946844310793924custom 52129627567596734732custom 52852912429748955922custom 53368572602808009322custom 52129800440030387571custom 53348016674580980051

Signed Demir.

23 Apr 2025, 23:41 UTC≈1,380 views33 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026

Вы любите тихого?

7💔6🤡3custom 54044946844310793923🍓2💊2🔥2🕊2

3 Apr 2025, 04:41 UTC≈1,310 views33 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026

Hb to me

❤‍🔥85💯3🕊3🍓2💋2💔2🔥2

30 Jan 2025, 21:44 UTC≈1,520 views49 reactions33 Starsread 11 August 2026

🗡️ iNFO sobre el propietario 🗡️ 🤩🤩🤩🤩 chaque problème qui visite l'esprit humain ne dépassera jamais ses limites, car notre cerveau crée de telles illusions pour synchroniser les fondements de la vie. il est banal de ne pas être submergé par le flux d'informations inutiles, notre cerveau crée des obstacles à son propre développement, ce qui stimule le progrès dans notre corps. un tel exemple peut être comparé à l'i

🥰14custom 54228333443814706039🔥83💋3🕊3😈3👍2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @DDX99N. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 901,026 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑯𝑬𝑫𝟎𝑪𝑻𝑨𝑻𝑶𝑲” (@DDX99N), 481 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DDX99N.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.